Grinchy said:LOL
You really are a part of the master race. Let me bow down to you because when I think of gaming, I think of playing the game.
The "PC Master Race" derail is the most logical and expected derail for this thread.abstract alien said:Of course, avid pc gamers would come into a console specific thread about console specific titles and start spewing bullshit, making the sane pc players look bad in the process lol
styl3s said:auto-aim? you mean aim assist? HUGE difference between the 2.
kokujin said:There's still a small amount in there.
One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
I predominantly play console games, I paused my Genesis to type this, but I try to play games on platforms where they work best.abstract alien said:Of course, avid pc gamers would come into a console specific thread about console specific titles and start spewing bullshit, making the sane pc players look bad in the process lol
Really? Some people just never made the migration to PC gaming and some don't care to. Not that big a deal.kokujin said:I think it is just ignorance why people stay playing console shooters.
Good luck with playing the OP in a few games of Socom 4 on your pc then. I'm out, since I don't actually have anything useful to contribute to the thread title and topic at hand lolkokujin said:I predominantly play console games, I paused my Genesis to type this, but I try to play games on platforms where they work best.
it had a temporary Lock on function though, that was entirely necessaryDrkirby said:I don't think the PS2 version of Tribes had Auto Aim.
Grinchy said:Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.
kokujin said:There's still a small amount in there.
One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
TheExecutive said:There is a "couch edition" .gif around here someplace...
You're kidding..? FYI not all console games are available on PC honeybunskokujin said:I think it is just ignorance why people stay playing console shooters.
Not when the games do not work because of some directx settings or because of a 64bit machine or driver issues. Your average gaming Joe will have no clue what to do in such situations and that's one of the few MAJOR advantages of console gaming.Kalnos said:Assuming we're talking about a non-technical PC user:
Install Game.
Launch Game.
Settings: Set Resolution, Choose pre-set graphics option
Play
Really, it's not that hard, and it isn't that different from consoles with their updates and installation nowadays.
With that said, it's all preference which to use control-wise and it doesn't really matter as long as KB/M is segregated from controller users.
I am not talking about all console games, just shooters.FTH said:You're kidding..? FYI not all console games are available on PC honeybuns
If they could mix an analog stick for movement with a mouse for aiming it would be perfect.I hate moving with asdw, but I hate aiming with a stick even more.ArachosiA 78 said:I can't play without some aim assist. Dual analog controls just aren't accurate enough (or maybe I just suck). Obviously a mouse is a lot more accurate, but I can't stand moving with a keyboard. So, overall I'd rather play with dual analog + aim assist.
kokujin said:One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
But it is very limiting.Joe White said:I disagree, because I think that competitive play requires players having about same advantages and disadvantages in their gaming environment. And inaccurate controls with aim assist for all is a part of that.
Yeah , no thats not how it works.Grinchy said:Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.
kokujin said:If they could mix an analog stick for movement with a mouse for aiming it would be perfect.I hate moving with asdw, but I hate aiming with a stick even more.
kokujin said:If they could mix an analog stick for movement with a mouse for aiming it would be perfect.I hate moving with asdw, but I hate aiming with a stick even more.
Noisepurge said:i sometimes use a Frag FX:
![]()
edit: updated the pic for a more modern version![]()
I thought it only worked for the PS3, if it works with the PC I am picking one up.ArachosiA 78 said:Nice...I would totally get that Frag FX controller if I had a modern PC or if the PS3 had any shooters I cared for.
Ydahs said:Not when the games do not work because of some directx settings or because of a 64bit machine or driver issues. Your average gaming Joe will have no clue what to do in such situations and that's one of the few MAJOR advantages of console gaming.
SneakyStephan said:Yeah , no thats not how it works.
I don't even have to put a disc in my syste, I get from pressing my shortcut to playing about 4-5 times faster than going from putting in the disc to playing on a console too.
Loading times between maps are almost non existant and I don't have to stare at lobby countdowns for minutes on end between every match.
The latter especially does my head in when playing anything on a console, you barely get to frigging play.
Configs are options, optional, you CAN configure things to be more to your liking.
On consoles you are always stuck at the default settings wether you like it or not.
@FTH: You aren't goig to tell me the exlusives are a reason to play shooters on consoles right?
I get the couch argument (sort of), but pc has a way way wider array of exlusives to choose from when it comes to fps games.
Most of them are of much higher quality too.
Halo might have been the only fps type that you couldnt really find on pc , but that changed when section 8 was released 2 years ago, and now prejudice is out too.
kokujin said:I thought it only worked for the PS3, if it works with the PC I am picking one up.
Shambles said:
I'm with you man. Can't understand this thing at all. If I want to play FPS or RTS - I play'em on PC. If I want play arcade games or fightings - consoles is my choice.kokujin said:One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
Kind of steep I'll read up on it some.ArachosiA 78 said:I checked it out on Amazon. Apparently it works with PS3, PC and Mac. It's 90 bucks though.
Same with me, awesome avatar, Contra HC is my 2nd favorite game of all time(1st is Alien Soldier)The_Player said:I'm with you man. Can't understand this thing at all. If I want to play FPS or RTS - I play'em on PC. If I want play arcade games or fightings - consoles is my choice.
Ok, not all console shooters are available on PC then.kokujin said:I am not talking about all console games, just shooters.
yeah no, this is not what the discussion is about. It was supposed to be about auto aiming, until the pc gamers had to muck it up into gamebox warz.SneakyStephan said:Yeah , no thats not how it works.
stuff
Because aiming with a controller doesn't work well, halo CE on xbox was lauded for being the first console shooter to come up with an auto aim system that allowed you to hit stuff while still being a bit subtle (it was strong aim assist though) and without feeling like it took control away from you.SabinFigaro said:I... really had no idea many console shooters had auto-aim online. Why?
cant_tell_if_trolling.jpgFTH said:Ok, not all console shooters are available on PC then.
Of course, but it's not a problem because most of them aren't that good.FTH said:Ok, not all console shooters are available on PC then.
kokujin said:But it is very limiting.
Point taken. I've never taken a console shooter online, so I didn't realize this.SneakyStephan said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDVcNj9HrgE
This is what happens when a pc game gets ported to consoles without mouse support and without auto aim.
It's not pretty.
I'll admit btw that uncharted 2 is pretty unique n well made online.kokujin said:Of course, but it's not a problem because most of them aren't that good.
WatThe_Player said:cant_tell_if_trolling.jpg
Ookay well, you live in your world I live in mine. I've played PC shooters and console shooters, and both platforms offer exclusively great experiences. When I can play Uncharted III on a PC then this will make any sense.kokujin said:Of course, but it's not a problem because most of them aren't that good.
I do agree with you about keeping everything even, but cutting off everyone at the knees is a bit too much.Joe White said:Thats how I like it. I prefer competitive LAN-gaming in monitored environment where players have identical hardware and are allowed to configure controls, but not graphics. I've always hated how competitive players configure games look on their own PCs.
Console gaming at least provides similar hardware and graphics for every one.
People like playing where their friends are. Many people who play on consoles started playing fps shooters with Goldeneye so a dual analog stick is just fine with them. I know plenty of PC gamers who plug in a 360 remote on PC fps even. it's a matter of preference. Some people are just fine playing on a console. Some people like control pads. Millions in fact. It's not ignorance or lowered standards as has been stated already it's a simple preference.The_Player said:I'm with you man. Can't understand this thing at all. If I want to play FPS or RTS - I play'em on PC. If I want play arcade games or fightings - consoles is my choice.
I'm not arguing which platform is better or has more exclusives, that's childish/pointless to me. kokujin stated that ignorance is the reason people play console shooters. I'm saying that having fun with a gaming experience that's only available on console is the reason people play console shooters.SneakyStephan said:@FTH: You aren't goig to tell me the exlusives are a reason to play shooters on consoles right?
I get the couch argument (sort of), but pc has a way way wider array of exlusives to choose from when it comes to fps games.
Most of them are of much higher quality too.
The graphics settings are about getting to the absolute peak of possible play in that game and in most of them where it is done it suits them perfectly.Joe White said:Thats how I like it. I prefer competitive LAN-gaming in monitored environment where players have identical hardware and are allowed to configure controls, but not graphics. I've always hated how competitive players configure games look on their own PCs.
Console gaming at least provides similar hardware and graphics for every one.