CrazedArabMan said:Been playing Brink and it feels like their is very little auto-aim in it.
AtomHeart said:There's definitely a ton of auto-aim in Brink, it just depends on the range. I had an enemy walk by me and it actually turned me around to face him as he walked by without me even touching the analogue stick.
Metroid Prime isn't online.Leon S. Kennedy said:Metroid Prime Trilogy
Golden Eye
COD on wii (I assume, I haven't played it)
Conduit 1&2
KZ3 with ps move
Turn that shit it off or...I've been playing Socom 4 and enjoying it for many reasons including the lack of auto aim. I simply can't enjoy the COD games because its embarrassing how much auto aim there is.
Bad Company 2 has minimal auto aim as does Uncharted 2. What else am I missing?
that's not auto-aim, that's what Halo uses; Bungie calls it aim assist. Auto-Aim doesn't move your vision/reticule, but instead guides the bullets toward the opponent when your reticule is within a certain range of them on screen. Aim assist actually makes enemies kind of "stick" to your reticule, and will take control so to speak to be sure the reticule is on them.AtomHeart said:There's definitely a ton of auto-aim in Brink, it just depends on the range. I had an enemy walk by me and it actually turned me around to face him as he walked by without me even touching the analogue stick.
LevityNYC said:I've been playing Socom 4 and enjoying it for many reasons including the lack of auto aim. I simply can't enjoy the COD games because its embarrassing how much auto aim there is.
Bad Company 2 has minimal auto aim as does Uncharted 2. What else am I missing?
There's still a small amount in there.birdcity said:Battlefield Bad Co. 2
Halo has all forms of aim assist on console, magnetism, adhesion, auto-aim. They all serve a purpose. Some are to slow your reticule on a target, some are to help keep the reticule on the target, and the auto aim can help the bullet trajectory when you are shooting within said target.Psy-Phi said:that's not auto-aim, that's what Halo uses; Bungie calls it aim assist. Auto-Aim doesn't move your vision/reticule, but instead guides the bullets toward the opponent when your reticule is within a certain range of them on screen. Aim assist actually makes enemies kind of "stick" to your reticule, and will take control so to speak to be sure the reticule is on them.
chixdiggit said:What is the difference between auto aim and aim assist?
deeeerrrrrrrrrrpkokujin said:One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
I think it's a valid question.Unless it's common knowledge, then I am simply out of the loop.Nice avatar btw, it reeks of awesomeness.bangai-o said:deeeerrrrrrrrrrp
kokujin said:One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate. I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games. they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
kokujin said:There's still a small amount in there.
One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
LevityNYC said:With Socom 4 out, is the MAG community still active?
BloodySinner said:Turn that shit it off or...
.
Most people aren't looking at this as a serious activity...kokujin said:There's still a small amount in there.
One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
Have you tried playing PC FPS games?LevityNYC said:i hate getting smoked by people who play with it on.
So don't spend $500 upgrading your pc every year?LevityNYC said:I dont have $500 to spend upgrading my pc every year.
Then you can't be that serious about the game.Grinchy said:Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.
That's ridiculous, for 500 dollars you can build a PC that will yield better performance than any console available today.LevityNYC said:I dont have $500 to spend upgrading my pc every year.
I guess console players can't join your club then? Damn.kokujin said:Then you can't be that serious about the game.
If you have to do all that, there's something wrong with the game.Grinchy said:Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.
LOLkokujin said:Then you can't be that serious about the game.
Gaming on a PC still has a learning curve (compared to consoles). This deters a ton of people.Htown said:If you have to do all that, there's something wrong with the game.
Grinchy said:Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.