• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

|OT| French Presidential Elect 2017 - La France est toujours insoumise; Le Pen loses

GAF Decides


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Alx

Member
That's incredible because if Hamon can (and probably will) steal some from Mélanchon, he can actually reach back the top.

Sick.

The attacks and scandals will probably hit Macron at last second. He's the man to kill for everybody.


He already "stole" around 5% according to the latest trends, the remaining 10 might be harder to convince.

About Macron, there was a tentative start of something with the way he used his budget before leaving his role as a minister, but apparently it's not likely to become a big story (yeah I know, that's what I said about the Pénélope story too :p)

If Macron goes down too can LePen win?

Unlikely. Macron going down would benefit one of the other moderate candidates, but probably not Le Pen. As a matter of fact all candidates have been moving up and down during the last weeks, and Le Pen hasn't moved from 25-27%.
 

Slaythe

Member
He already "stole" around 5% according to the latest trends, the remaining 10 might be harder to convince.

About Macron, there was a tentative start of something with the way he used his budget before leaving his role as a minister, but apparently it's not likely to become a big story (yeah I know, that's what I said about the Pénélope story too :p)

Yeah but now Mélanchon has literally 0 chance to win, while before he was supposed to be above Hamon.

The more time passes, the bigger Hamon gets as the left candidate. Those polls just follow his investiture.

Not all Mélanchon supporters will go Hamon but he only needs 4% from him to be "big". And the bigger he gets the more left voters he will get.


Lepen can only win against Fillon. (if everything goes right for her)

She'll lose to Hamon and Macron easily.
 

Mael

Member
I didn't know we had an OT for this!
Great to see GAF discussing this.
Will be complicated to do my civic duty this year but by God I'll try!

Fillon's meltdown is the best thing to happen this year so far.

Can someone explain Macron's whatever the hell is happening?
I can't wrap my head around that at all.
 

mo60

Member
I didn't know we had an OT for this!
Great to see GAF discussing this.
Will be complicated to do my civic duty this year but by God I'll try!

Fillon's meltdown is the best thing to happen this year so far.

Can someone explain Macron's whatever the hell is happening?
I can't wrap my head around that at all.

Macron's has been rising in polls lately because center-left wing Socialist voters scared of Hamon are probably moving slightly towards him while center right wing voters that used to support Fillon are ditching him for Macron most likely. Le Pen has stayed pretty static in polls in the last month or so and she's pretty much doomed no matter what happens to Macron at this point.
 

Mael

Member
Macron's has been rising in polls lately because center-left wing Socialist voters scared of Hamon are probably moving slightly towards him while center right wing voters that used to support Fillon are ditching him for Macron most likely. Le Pen has stayed pretty static in polls in the last month or so and she's pretty much doomed no matter what happens to Macron at this point.

That part of the mechanic I understand.
What I don't get is how Macron didn't cratter like Valls already.
Or maybe people aren't so down on Hollande as the vocal social media seems to claim?
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
mDJMbt2.png

.
 

mo60

Member
That part of the mechanic I understand.
What I don't get is how Macron didn't cratter like Valls already.
Or maybe people aren't so down on Hollande as the vocal social media seems to claim?

He hasn't cratered like Valls yet because he is not as tied to the current government as Valls was.He resigned from the unpopular Hollande government and created his own movement not tied to the current establishment which seems to be helping his campaign a lot.
 

Alx

Member
I still wonder why the Hollande presidency/government has such a bad outlook. Was it that bad ? As much as I can't find anything to praise him for, I can't find anything to blame him for either. Well unemployment and growth aren't great, but it's not as if previous governments were better.
 

G.O.O.

Member
That part of the mechanic I understand.
What I don't get is how Macron didn't cratter like Valls already.
Or maybe people aren't so down on Hollande as the vocal social media seems to claim?
New political structure, generally positive, can-do attitude, and to be honest the finance minister job allows one to give a good impression without telling too much about what you've been doing. Probably the kind of thing that made DSK popular before the sofitel case.
 
I still wonder why the Hollande presidency/government has such a bad outlook. Was it that bad ? As much as I can't find anything to praise him for, I can't find anything to blame him for either. Well unemployment and growth aren't great, but it's not as if previous governments were better.

The Cahuzac affair, les frondeurs showed some form of imcompetence. Then there's the 49.3, the airport of Notre-Dame des Landes with the death of the protester, The El Khomri law, Trierweiler, the book "Un président ne devrait pas dire ça" and I fell like it's a lot for one government.

Granted it's the first presidency where I'm old enough to follow.
 

Mael

Member
He hasn't cratered like Valls yet because he is not as tied to the current government as Valls was.He resigned from the unpopular Hollande government and created his own movement not tied to the current establishment which seems to be helping his campaign a lot.
Unless he went with his own deputés and senators, he's kind of alone in his movement.
Then again when you see the jokers people elect that's certainly a good thing...
He's seemed like a personnal friend of Hollande to boot, unlike the "have to suffer" Valls that clearly was there because he pretty much had no choice there.
New political structure, generally positive, can-do attitude, and to be honest the finance minister job allows one to give a good impression without telling too much about what you've been doing. Probably the kind of thing that made DSK popular before the sofitel case.
That's a good point and he doesn't have anything bad tied to him yet.
For all the good talk people gave DSK, he still was a fucking crook of the level of Chirac in the 2000's (cassette Mery for example).
This one seems like Villepin although Macron seems to actually be popular beyond that one speech he did unlike that big guy.
The Cahuzac affair, les frondeurs showed some form of imcompetence. Then there's the 49.3, the airport of Notre-Dame des Landes with the death of the protester, The El Khomri law, Trierweiler, the book "Un président ne devrait pas dire ça" and I fell like it's a lot for one government.

Granted it's the first presidency where I'm old enough to follow.

You should have seen Mitterand, it started off well.
By the time he was reelected, it was disaster after disasters.
even the choices for Prime ministers were horrible.
Who still remember Edith Cresson after all.
The whole thing with Beregovoy was beyond stupid.
Rainbow Warrior, the loss in 95 and so on.
Seriously 2nd round was a disaster.
Chirac was hilariously incompetent but he did manage to get reelected because he actually did nothing and he's a nice guy.
Who gives a shit about governing after all?
I don't think I need to say anything about Sarkozy, the guy who was elected to bring the American social model in France just before the whole model fell apart in 2007.
Yeah Hollande wasn't so bad all in all.

Best part was probably the combo Jospin/Chirac that really worked well surprisingly.
 

Alx

Member
I caught some parts of his meeting on TV, he's a very good speaker. But the cheering crowd was annoying.

Also apparently Fillon is expected to make an apprarance on TV in the coming days, where he would do a mea culpa and disclose all his financial stuff (assistants, consulting, patrimony,...) (source c l'hebdo on France 5)
 

Makareu

Member
I think Jospin knew his stuff. Seemed like one of the few genuine, honest ones too. It's unfortunate he had the charisma of a toilet bowl.

I still cant get over 2002. It was the first and only time, for me, where the election was about choosing someone (Jospin) and not about eliminating everyone else.

Regarding Macron, I kind of like him but I dont really know why. That's usually not a good sign in politics. I'll have some homeworks to do.
 
SO generally speaking it looks like

Le Pen first and Macron second in the primaries and then Macron win in the finals correct?

I cant imagine UMP voters will vote for le pen
 

mo60

Member

G.O.O.

Member
Well aren't most le pen voter, former communist voter?
Not *most*. The Jean-Marie era was fiercely anticommunist, his daughter turned the party into something more left-wing inspired economically and that allowed her to bring in former communists (#2 Philippot himself used to be from the sovereignist left).

But most of the components of the racist/antidemocratic right are still there - and can't wait to take back the party btw.
 

KooopaKid

Banned
SO generally speaking it looks like

Le Pen first and Macron second in the primaries and then Macron win in the finals correct?

I cant imagine UMP voters will vote for le pen

A banker VS Le Pen. What a great choice! Fuck this. I will not vote if that's the case.
 
A banker VS Le Pen. What a great choice! Fuck this. I will not vote if that's the case.

SOunds awefully close to those bernie or busters that indirectly helped trump to get elected.

Also it shouldnt be an automatic disqualification just because you worked for banks in the past. Its important what the current stance is on regulations, EU, economic policy, NATO and things like that.
 

EmiPrime

Member
A banker VS Le Pen. What a great choice! Fuck this. I will not vote if that's the case.

A Le Pen victory would destroy the country to such an extent it will take generations to recover from but yeah a centre-left former investment banker who can be gotten rid of a few years later if he's a flop is totally equivalent. /s

Look at how much damage Trump has managed to inflict on the US in just 2 weeks and wake up.
 
The future of the EU is the most important issue right now. I'd vote for Fillon in a heartbeat in a run off between him and Le Pen, and I really dislike Fillon. She's made abundantly clear she's steering towards a Brexit scenario.

So yeah, "but a banker" is really below the stakes and is awfully reminiscent of recent elections. The US election has made it crystal clear that all you need is apathy to fuck yourself out of the developed world.
 

G.O.O.

Member
A banker VS Le Pen. What a great choice! Fuck this. I will not vote if that's the case.
Mario Draghi is a former Goldman Sachs banker and has probably been the most important force in the EU to counter the effects of austerity. Having been a banker doesn't make one a heartless bastard :eek:
 

Alx

Member
A banker VS Le Pen. What a great choice! Fuck this. I will not vote if that's the case.

Oh come on, first you were saying "Fillon Vs Le Pen, I'm not voting !", now it's "Macron Vs Le Pen, I'm not voting !".
Then, about the far right :
If you want to slow down the free transit of persons, to have the power to print your own money again, detach your country's decisions from Brussels, favorize your national enterprises, stop the TTIP, take a backseat in NATO, what are your options as a voter?

Could you at least embrace your opinions without pretending ?
 

Fistwell

Member
bro

I don't go and google links between every candidates and every country of note, thought we all were having a conversation here. My bad I guess. Anyways, thanks for going out of your way to get me that insulting cute little animation.

Have you been living in a cave? Nearly every far right party in Europe has financial and idealogical ties to Russia.
I've been living in a country where I don't speak the language, and not watching any TV. Guess that qualifies as a cave. I'll stop asking questions guys, my bad.
 

Holden

Member
tbf Assange claimed he had dirt on clinton the last few months of the election and he had literately nothing.

Seems like this will help Hamon more than anybody if this is true.
 

Zautruche

Banned
Oh come on, first you were saying "Fillon Vs Le Pen, I'm not voting !", now it's "Macron Vs Le Pen, I'm not voting !".
Then, about the far right :


Could you at least embrace your opinions without pretending ?

Why would he ? FN's minions are told to be devious and manipulative when engaging opponents.
 

oti

Banned
bro

I don't go and google links between every candidates and every country of note, thought we all were having a conversation here. My bad I guess. Anyways, thanks for going out of your way to get me that insulting cute little animation.


I've been living in a country where I don't speak the language, and not watching any TV. Guess that qualifies as a cave. I'll stop asking questions guys, my bad.

Le Pen is the biggest threat to the Europen Union. People should really read up on her and watch some of her interviews. The way she sneaks in her awful ideology behind reasonable sounding ideas is fascinating. That's why she's so dangerous.
 

EmiPrime

Member
I've been living in a country where I don't speak the language, and not watching any TV. Guess that qualifies as a cave. I'll stop asking questions guys, my bad.

Just surprising that you had heard of Fillion's pro-Russian sympathies but not Le Pen's financial ties to the Putin regime and her constant fawning over him. One is a lot more overt than the other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom