Agree with what he said - I'm even giving up on 3DS to focus on the Wii U
Why?...
Are you going to pretend that all those good 3ds games don't exist?
Agree with what he said - I'm even giving up on 3DS to focus on the Wii U
So, why aren't western devs supporting the 3DS then?
It's hard to be excited about them when WiiU is getting so many awesome games, I guess.Why?...
Are you going to pretend that all those good 3ds games don't exist?
So, why aren't western devs supporting the 3DS then?
It's hard to be excited about them when WiiU is getting so many awesome games, I guess.
Western devs have never been particularly bullish on dedicated handhelds in general.
Spinoffs of huge western 3rd party games, made by B/C teams and Gameloft.Did they with the DS, really? Struggling to think of huge western 3rd party games.
Most likely sure, but again, big Western DS titles...?Could it be because 3DS games have low sales outside of Japan?
Spinoffs of huge western 3rd party games, made by B/C teams and Gameloft.
Sarcasm indeed.Either this is sarcasm or Rm88 is from bizarro world where 3DS only has a port of 2011's Xbox 360/PS3 hit Resi Revelations to look forward to...
If DS AKA the best selling gaming device ever released didn't attract a ton of Western support, I'm not sure what's so surprising about 3DS not getting it either. And as has been mentioned plenty of times already, Western developers mostly don't care about handhelds, period.
Spinoffs of huge western 3rd party games, made by B/C teams and Gameloft.
In case it wasn't clear, he's talking about this from a business perspective, not a "What are cj_iwakura's favorite games?" perspective.
Does that make up for years of R&D and marketing?The one thing I don't get is
" not a prayer of making money on vita"
Aren't they in profit already? Not to say its selling well but with the memory cards and attatch rate I swear they said they are already making money
I don't think there's been ONE large-budget, non-spinoff Western handheld IP.
That really says a lot about Western developer sentiment. Handhelds are a uniquely Japanese phenomenon. Japanese gamers + developers are overwhelmingly entranced by them.
So the Vita not being a Japanese-focused console...is partially why it's struggling so much.
So, why aren't western devs supporting the 3DS then?
Where are the lies?
Who said anything about lies? Do people only make threads about lies?
It's hard to be excited about them when WiiU is getting so many awesome games, I guess.
And Western devs in general (not just 3DS) are trash at supporting handhelds.
I thought that statement was so outrageous that it was very clearly sarcasm, haha.So were lying now?
I like Nintendo too but , really?
If DS AKA the best selling gaming device ever released didn't attract a ton of Western support, I'm not sure what's so surprising about 3DS not getting it either. And as has been mentioned plenty of times already, Western developers mostly don't care about handhelds, period.
Sarcasm indeed.
Patcher being right about something actually is groundbreakingI like the 'hes right' comments. Like he says something groundbreaking.
Well, he's right. The best games of 2013 so far are iOS exclusive while Vita and 3DS cling to scraps as farmed out ports of indie games done better on PC and Mac and B-tier Nintendo franchises such as Luigi's Mansion. I enjoy my 3DS, and less so my Vita, but they're looking increasingly marginalized in the West.
The one thing I don't get is
" not a prayer of making money on vita"
Aren't they in profit already? Not to say its selling well but with the memory cards and attatch rate I swear they said they are already making money
If there's any post-launch quote stating that the Vita business is currently profitable, I'm not aware of it. All we know right now is that that was the plan prior to launch, but that was also when Sony was still expecting to sell 10 million Vitas this fiscal year.
An accessory is an accessory. Vita can't be both supplementary and something that PS4 is designed around.
While Sony only talked about Vita streaming at the 2/20 conference, their "Remote Play" slide also included images of smartphones and tablets, which raises questions about how essential Vita really is for that purpose.
While Sony only talked about Vita streaming at the 2/20 conference, their "Remote Play" slide also included images of smartphones and tablets, which raises questions about how essential Vita really is for that purpose.
By the way doesnt Mr Patcher have a user on NeoGAF in which case is there any reason whatsoever we have others post his opinions ?
This this this. Patcher manages to troll GAF, and the Internet in general, for hits without ever actually having to generate any effort, content or substance. He just says some shit, and angry nerds gobble it up and sow his seed all over message boards everywhere. Do not feed the troll.
I absolutely agree that the Vita does too much.
Cut functionality, cut price, make games for it.
And those fucking memory cards are criminal.
But isnt that what a lot of developers are looking for? A lot of functionality to pick and choose from?
I don't own a PSVita, but what functionality is too much? What would you cut out?
But isnt that what a lot of developers are looking for? A lot of functionality to pick and choose from?
I don't own a PSVita, but what functionality is too much? What would you cut out?
I want Year Walk more than any game coming out on 3ds or Vita this year.
*runs*
The Vita is a joke and if they would have said it was just going to be a niche system and a PS4 dreaming device I would have never bought one' I expected at least half of the support the PSP got but it can't even manage that. Uncharted, Gravity Rush, and Persona are great but it needs a lot more and the people that are "fine" with the output definitely have lower expectations than me.
I don't think the Vita is save-able. Sony quite literally possesses zero must-have titles in their arsenal. It would require them to get something exclusive on-par with Minecraft/Pokemon etc. I understand the 3DS is far from a success outside of Japan, but for me personally it's grown into a success. I'm at the point now where I'm ready to dump my Wii U on the first person willing to buy it and just use my 3DSXL as my sole mechanism to play Nintendo titles. I loved the Vita hardware, but I kept finding fewer and fewer reasons to use it, so I sold it. I'd love it if they turned it around, but I doubt it. Prove me wrong, Sony.
Microsoft is not in the games business to sell games, that isn't why they started this. Go back to 2001, Consumer Electronic Show, Bill Gates keynote... Billgates unveiled the Xbox and he said: "This box is going to be the entertainment hub in the living room". Now, Microsoft lost It's way early on because they had a bunch of guys working on the box who were former developers, you know all of them... those guys were gamers all the way and chased games, and they made the Xbox in to a hardcore game box.
Why are you talking about it like the system's life is over? There was another thread that said there are 100 games coming out for it this year.
Going by that argument, you could say that the PS3 is un-save-able, but they've proven you don't have to have a Mario or Halo to need saving.
The Vita is a joke and if they would have said it was just going to be a niche system and a PS4 dreaming device I would have never bought one' I expected at least half of the support the PSP got but it can't even manage that. Uncharted, Gravity Rush, and Persona are great but it needs a lot more and the people that are "fine" with the output definitely have lower expectations than me.
I thought that statement was so outrageous that it was very clearly sarcasm, haha.
Yeah, we don't really know for sure either way. However, they were using off-the-shelf parts, and things get cheaper as time goes on, so it's certainly feasible that they could be making a profit as of now.
Going by that argument, you could say that the PS3 is un-save-able, but they've proven you don't have to have a Mario or Halo to need saving.