Illithid Dude
Member
Remember the leap between Uncharted and Uncharted 2? The PS4 graphics are going to get exponentially better.
When I think of the PS3 and Xbox360 I think of consoles that struggled to display games at an acceptable resolution. Image quality was extremely poor even with assets garbled and worlds often shrunken. It is hard to convey that visual jump through streams or internet videos.This is how I feel. Some people seem to understand "diminishing returns" to mean "it doesn't look better at all," but that's not it. The games clearly look better than anything from this gen, it's just not the wow factor it was going from low-res gouraud-shaded polys to hi-res normal-mapped models, and I don't think there will be another leap like that in terms of rendering.
Those people are the saddest of all.
Maybe some. I'm sure from now on it'll be. But plenty of people honestly jizzed over it.
PS3 games:
Shame people still insist on judging alpha footage of games in the pre-launch stage of a console's life.
The least people could do is hold off on these conclusive judgements to save from making themselves look impatient or uninformed when we just went through a generation of consoles that saw massive graphical leaps over its duration.
Edit: I mean 512MB split RAM to 8GB unified DDR5.. this is a massive jump. The GPU is also generations ahead of the PS3 hardware, this is going to be a funny discussion to look back on.
Not really somebody can throw up some killzone 3 gifs and GT5 and I can honestly say they did not blow anything out of the water.Really? Everything shown blew the PS3 out of the water IMO.
The jump in graphics was instantly recognizable last gen and before though. Even with pre-launch software
Not really somebody can throw up some killzone 3 gifs and GT5 and I can honestly say they did not blow anything out of the water.
That deep down dragon thing on the other hand that blew some shit out the water if its real.
The graphical leaps are pretty clear to me, and these are just early games. Games a couple years or more from now will be even more impressive.
As a side note, I just realized one positive side effect from today's footage is that I don't expect to see this overused X gif anymore.
Funny how people can be so far apart on graphical impressions. On one hand, you have people saying tonight's showings aren't impressive, and on the other hand you have people thinking the above gif shows how Wii U wipes the floor with current gen graphics.
I understand why many are excited over it. It's the next evolution of an RPG that many people loved. Yet, there were some people who used it in defense of Wii U when people would blast it's graphical prowess. Never said everyone jizzed over it for the same reasons.If you think people were jizzing over the graphics then you missed the point and should probably actually investigate to why people were excited over it.
Wait, are people saying that wasn't real time?
Look at Capcom's graphics engine this gen compared to Bethseda's for your answer.
I understand why many are excited over it. It's the next evolution of an RPG that many people loved. Yet, there were some people who used it in defense of Wii U when people would blast it's graphical prowess. Never said everyone jizzed over it for the same reasons.
launch titles..
I don't know how someone can look at this and think that it only looks a little better than current-gen visuals. I'm actually shocked by how good the games have looked so far, they've surpassed my expectations.
For once, I'd have to agree with the guy.
The visuals, while definitely pretty, did not feel like a substantial leap over PS3.
Am I the only one that feels like we're truly getting diminishing returns?
Killzone looked incredible. Then they started playing and it was another fps. Nothing got me excited gameplay wise. Poor show for me. Hype lowered
Why all of the sudden is this now foolish? Past gens it wasnt. Next gen dont get special care. Just because of statement like these you truly know the jump was not so big.It is deeply foolish to compare late generation titles with launch titles that are likely still in their alpha stages.
Killzone, yes. Not sure why people think that. The Capcom crap though. Not sure who they thought they were fooling.
For once, I'd have to agree with the guy.
The visuals, while definitely pretty, did not feel like a substantial leap over PS3.
Am I the only one that feels like we're truly getting diminishing returns?
Graphics were as expected, I was not surprised in the least. An improvement over current gen (it bloody well should be, after all this time) but nothing really groundbreaking. It was certainly a much smaller leap than previous generations.
Rose tinted goggles. Name one game shown at the 360 or PS3 actual launch partys that absolutely eclipsed what was available on the previous systems.
The jump in graphics was instantly recognizable last gen and before though. Even with pre-launch software
I saw this in another thread, to... I'd wager the most humiliating tag possible, that those architecture in the KZ demo were not being rendered in real time; there's definitely a catch in what's begin shown, maybe a very intelligent design technique + high fidelity graphics*, but definitely not regular rendering of a city at that distance with an HD resolution.Yeah....no.
When I think of the PS3 and Xbox360 I think of consoles that struggled to display games at an acceptable resolution. Image quality was extremely poor even with assets garbled and worlds often shrunken. It is hard to convey that visual jump through streams or internet videos.
I've always been impressed by Playstation graphics. Todays conference was no exception, always pushing consoles to the brim of graphical play.
I just want to see how the PS4 brings new gameplay features forward. I mean I saw none of that.
Did they use that touchpad? No. Whats it good for? We don't know.
Rose tinted goggles. Name one game shown at the 360 or PS3 actual launch partys that absolutely eclipsed what was available on the previous systems.
I don't know if anyone who fits my description is in this thread, because I don't mentally catalogue usernames of every post I read. Sometimes I'll remember a specific poster, but often times I don't. I can tell you a bunch of people vocally hated on MGS4 despite it being voted GAF's GOTY 2008, twice, but I couldn't cite a specific single name or post without going through the unnecessary effort to do so. Just take it as me referencing something from memory, and not calling any one out in particular.What people are you referring to? Are they in this thread?
When I first saw Oblivion running, my jaw dropped.
Kameo.
Rose tinted goggles. Name one game shown at the 360 or PS3 actual launch partys that absolutely eclipsed what was available on the previous systems.
Wow, I didn't think anyone would be undermining the graphics. Considering how amazing some of these launch/launch window titles will look, I can't wait to see what developers will be putting together in a few years.
People are upset that the jump in detail isn't very pronounced. Somewhere there is some developer who did texture work who is raging, somewhere there is some fan of Sony raging.. but the devil isn't in the details.. it needs to be center stage, it shouldn't ever need to be discussed why/how the graphics are better and in what ways. We shouldn't need comparison screen shots.
All of that indicates there is, a tangible concern that the games shown today really don't look mind boggling better than whats possible already. Sure they are better, I don't think anyone is denying that. Its just, ... its your chance to show off your new console and thats all you got?
To be honest, I'm starting to suspect MS is going to do the same and ultimately what this next gen is going to be remembered most for isn't the games, or graphic leaps therein but the advancement of features, social media, digital consumption and all sorts of other non gaming related "stuff". People making arguments against todays PS4 graphics have justifiable reasoning to do so.
PS3 games:
Honestly these still blow my mind. There's just not that much farther to go.
I was very impressed with some of the PS4 footage though. I would be fine if it were the last console, I just don't care if games look better after this.
Kameo, COD2, Condemned, Resistance and King Kong were all visually well beyond what the PS2 or Xbox could have done. The leap shown by the new Killzone is similar. I think people may be missing the fact that if the launch games look like Killzone, the stuff two or three years down the road will be insane.
People are upset that the jump in detail isn't very pronounced. Somewhere there is some developer who did texture work who is raging, somewhere there is some fan of Sony raging.. but the devil isn't in the details.. it needs to be center stage, it shouldn't ever need to be discussed why/how the graphics are better and in what ways. We shouldn't need comparison screen shots.
All of that indicates there is, a tangible concern that the games shown today really don't look mind boggling better than whats possible already. Sure they are better, I don't think anyone is denying that. Its just, ... its your chance to show off your new console and thats all you got?
To be honest, I'm starting to suspect MS is going to do the same and ultimately what this next gen is going to be remembered most for isn't the games, or graphic leaps therein but the advancement of features, social media, digital consumption and all sorts of other non gaming related "stuff". People making arguments against todays PS4 graphics have justifiable reasoning to do so.
Many people expect more. If that bothers developers, or if that bothers other people.. tough luck. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and they all stink.