Fox Mulder
Member
I wouldn't care how it looks if it was $199.
Or people with audio systems from five years ago lol. It's not that big of a deal, but you're exaggerating a lot. Honestly I usually only use my speakers for movies anyhow, and just use the TV speakers for games. That's like one of my favorite PS3 features, dual audio out.Oh boy, so the five people left with stereo systems from the 90s can be happy!
I remember the PS3 slim 1.0 received the same reactions here.Now GAF loves it.
YepIt's absolutely hideous. Hard to believe that design came out of Sony.
I don't know if it's the ugliest, but it's up there.
I wouldn't care how it looks if it was $199.
I don't know about ever but it really is absolutely hideous. Looks like a chic garbage bin from the 90s.
Foreman Grill >>>>>>
Nope, this is pretty ugly indeed.
But the PS3 was never a beauty queen to begin with
No. That honor goes to the SNES.
This is probably the ugliest console I've ever seen. Clear the nostalgia from your mind. Yes it was a great system. One of the greatest in fact, but the design is plain ugly.
After I saw some of the pics on Playstation Facebook, yeah it's gaf being gaf.
It really isn't all that bad looking.
HOWEVER
The bundle for it is completly whack. Not to mention confusing.
So we have a PS3 Slim with assassins creed 3 and a New Slimmer PS3 with Uncharted 3 and Dust...
Seems like the bundle should have started with Ass Creed 3 so that they can push more of those units off the shelve. but I guess they're just trying to clear house and phase out that slim model.
Not to mention Uncharted 3 and Dust is a weak pack in.
Uncharted was already part of a bundle and can be had for cheap now. No amount of "MP content" is going to change that. Also dust seems like it was thrown in just so that people will try the damn game.
Seems like if anything they should have maybe tried a Black Ops bundle with the new system. At least it would have been something.