• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rachael Dolezal claims she's jobless and on food stamps

Status
Not open for further replies.

Glix

Member
^ So white people outright lying about their ancestry regardless of what people actually of that ancestry have to say about it is okay so long as they're not "malicious"?

Christ on a cracker, y'all let white people get away with every-fucking-thing.

Yup. Just white people.

Amare-Stoudemire-Knicks.jpg
 
Yes because Amar'e embracing his Hebrew ancestry because his mother was, you know, Hebrew, is just like this.

Exactly the same.

Not one thing different.
 

Glix

Member
Yes because Amar'e embracing his Hebrew ancestry because his mother was, you know, Hebrew, is just like this.

Exactly the same.

Not one thing different.

I am not saying that Amare is at all comparable to Rachel. The picture was a direct response to the quoted post.

I like Amare. But read up. His grandmother told him there was Jewish in their ancestry. Despite a lot of trying both he and people who research this stuff were unable to find the link.

I was just a little put off by the "white white white" in that guys post.
 

Nepenthe

Member
Yup. Just white people.

*quotes image to find basketball player's name, because fuck if Nepenthe knows anything about basketball.*

*goes to his Wiki page*

In a 2010 interview, Stoudemire said, "I have been aware since my youth that I am a Hebrew through my mother, and that is something that has played a subtle but important role in my development."

Am I missing something here, or are you mad that I am broadly claiming white privilege on Rachel Dolezal's situation in your equation of a black man claiming Hebrew ancestry that he immediately has in his bloodline to a white woman claiming immediate black ancestry who ultimately has none?

EDIT:
I am not saying that Amare is at all comparable to Rachel. The picture was a direct response to the quoted post.

I like Amare. But read up. His grandmother told him there was Jewish in their ancestry. Despite a lot of trying both he and people who research this stuff were unable to find the link.

I was just a little put off by the "white white white" in that guys post.

So my second insinuation is correct. You're put off by me pointing the finger at largely white people trying to let a white women get away with claiming something she has no business claiming because even her own family denies her appeals to black ancestry, when the fact is we live in a long-winded historical context where it has never significantly worked in the reverse way for black people (and others like Asians) trying to claim the arbitrary, assimilating, forever-moving goalpost that is what we call the "white" identity. I'm not in the mood to try and be conciliatory to you or anyone else when it comes to this topic, because it does nothing but show the massive double standards that apply to the different racial classes of this country. If you're offended by me calling out white people, maybe some of y'all should stop doing, supporting, and caping for racist, transphobic, scientifically-illiterate shit like this when white people do it.
 
Okay, so what, they are literally not comparable in ANY capacity. This woman has 0 black ancestry, nobody in her family told her she had any, nobody around her had any.

They are not even remotely comparable. It should also be noted that Amar'e (spell his name the way it's spelled please) has never tried to co-opt the Hebrew/Israeli/Jewish identity for himself, either.
 

border

Member
Edit:
For those of you who don't know what Soul Man is:

SbV62Qs.jpg


It's the film that torpedoed C. Thomas Howell's career.

Why do people insist that Soul Man sank Howell's career, when the film seems to have been relatively successful and he continued getting work for decades? The movie played in heavy rotation on television for decades as well, so I don't think you can make the case that it was even that controversial in its time (at least not for a wide audience).
 

rjinaz

Member
"Sounds like?" It is outright bigotry.

It is extremely ignorant of transgender people's identities and experiences, meaning it is transphobic. It invades on black people's shared ancestry and culture in America of which white people are not entitled to by simply playing dress-up, meaning it is racist. It willfully ignores current science and tries to make an assertion on the basis of a hypothetical "well it -could- be true!" (because notice none of these niggas ever bring up a Google'd study or paper to try and add legitimacy to their claims, because it's not actually about proving anything), making it anti-science.

And all of this is happening under the guise of being a good little understanding "progressive" and trying to have an "open mind", which does nothing but position them as victims of an unreasonable opposition. This dumb shit is what alienates minorities from white allies and makes us look like fucking idiots to the anti-PC crowd.

Real talk, Rachel Dolezal stans get the fuck on my nerves. All of y'all need to just go away and watch some fucking anime or some shit.

You're right. It is.
 

Glix

Member
Okay, so what, they are literally not comparable in ANY capacity. This woman has 0 black ancestry, nobody in her family told her she had any, nobody around her had any.

They are not even remotely comparable. It should also be noted that Amar'e (spell his name the way it's spelled please) has never tried to co-opt the Hebrew/Israeli/Jewish identity for himself, either.

Here is the quote

^ So white people outright lying about their ancestry regardless of what people actually of that ancestry have to say about it is okay so long as they're not "malicious"?

Christ on a cracker, y'all let white people get away with every-fucking-thing.

It was a direct response to that. There is nothing malicious about amare, he thinks Judaism is awesome and I love him more for it.

It was just an example of someone else doing exactly what is described in the quoted post.
 
Why do people insist that Soul Man sank Howell's career, when the film seems to have been relatively successful and he continued getting work for decades? The movie played in heavy rotation on television for decades as well, so I don't think you can make the case that it was even that controversial in its time (at least not for a wide audience).

http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-29/entertainment/ca-7953_1_black-student

https://news.google.com/newspapers?...wUgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=_WQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1221,6139469
 
Here is the quote



It was a direct response to that. There is nothing malicious about amare, he thinks Judaism is awesome and I love him more for it.

It was just an example of someone else doing exactly what is described in the quoted post.

But he wasn't pretending to be Jewish or Hebrew, while knowing for an unequivocal fact that he wasn't. He was exploring what he thought and had been told told was a part of his ancestry.

He wasn't lying about it because he could.
 

Glix

Member
But he wasn't pretending to be Jewish or Hebrew, while knowing for an unequivocal fact that he wasn't. He was exploring what he thought and had been told told was a part of his ancestry.

He wasn't lying about it because he could.

Fair.

Do you say the same about Elizabeth Warren?
 

Slayven

Member
It wouldn't be so annoying if people weren't so ready to cape for her obvious bullshit. And so ready to accept blackness but only through a crazy white woman's lens
 
I hope she can find safe ground for her and her family one day

I don't think there was any type of malice in what she did.

Get outta here. She wasn't being malicious when she tried talking down black women for marrying white men? She wasn't being malicious when she said a Hispanic girl shouldn't speak for not looking Hispanic enough?
 

Slayven

Member
Get outta here. She wasn't being malicious when she tried talking down black women for marrying white men? She wasn't being malicious when she said a Hispanic girl shouldn't speak for not looking Hispanic enough?

not mention faking race attacks on her family. Or lying on her parents.
 

Nepenthe

Member
It wouldn't be so annoying if people weren't so ready to cape for her obvious bullshit. And so ready to accept blackness but only through a crazy white woman's lens

This. All of this.

It's a fucking 9-page argument to get people to understand the heaviness of the word "nigger," but a white woman putting on blackface and saying she's black being a potential case study of this shit called "transracialism?" Oh, well, suddenly everyone wants to be open-minded and listen to her!

This is the kind of hypocritical racism that makes me wanna tear my hair out.
 

Slayven

Member
This. All of this.

It's a fucking 9-page argument to get people to understand the heaviness of the word "nigger," but a white woman putting on blackface and saying she's black being a potential case study of this shit called "transracialism?" Oh, well, suddenly everyone wants to be open-minded and listen to her!

This is the kind of hypocritical racism that makes me wanna tear my hair out.

"Allies" stay showing their asses.

Nobody goes that hard for Tim Wise aka Marrec
 

Enzom21

Member
i dunno about her actions but she was deliberately changing her appearance. isn't that the definition of blackface

Okay? What does that have to do with that posters "acting black" nonsense?
Jesus....

Fucking....

Christ

Almighty.....TRANSRACIALISM ISN'T A THING!! Stop comparing it to LBGT holy fuck. :mad:
Let's be real here, it is pretty clear that these people don't give two fucks about whether "transracialism" exists or not. They're just using it to shit on people who are transgender.

I hope she can find safe ground for her and her family one day

I don't think there was any type of malice in what she did.

Let me quote myself here:
She also sued Howard University for discrimination. This whole thing feels like she watched Soul Man and thought; "This is a damn good idea!"
Rachel Dolezal, the former president of Spokane, Washington's NAACP who resigned Monday amid controversy over her racial heritage, unsuccessfully sued Howard University in 2002 for discriminating against her because of her race.

Dolezal's lawsuit against Howard, a historically black university, alleged that the university denied her a teaching assistant job, further employment and a scholarship because she was white. The lawsuit also claimed that Professor Alfred Smith, chair of the Art Department, specifically kept Dolezal from serving as a teaching assistant one semester and removed some of her artwork from a student exhibition because of racial prejudice.
She's a garbage human being.

Edit:
For those of you who don't know what Soul Man is:


It's the film that torpedoed C. Thomas Howell's career.
Yep, no malice at all...

she portrayed stereotypes in an attempt to be what she considered to be black

So she wasn't "acting black." There is no specific way for us to act.

I am not saying that Amare is at all comparable to Rachel. The picture was a direct response to the quoted post.

I like Amare. But read up. His grandmother told him there was Jewish in their ancestry. Despite a lot of trying both he and people who research this stuff were unable to find the link.

I was just a little put off by the "white white white" in that guys post.
I know right, why won't people let white people get away with whatever they want? How dare someone comment on white privilege.
Hold on, let me find some black person that has shit all to do with this story as some wacky counterpoint because "white white white!"
Whiteness was attacked!
 
I am not saying that Amare is at all comparable to Rachel. The picture was a direct response to the quoted post.

I like Amare. But read up. His grandmother told him there was Jewish in their ancestry. Despite a lot of trying both he and people who research this stuff were unable to find the link.

I was just a little put off by the "white white white" in that guys post.

So you get "triggered" and tried ya hardest to find something?
 
I read the interview in the Guardian at the weekend. It was incredibly fair (Decca Aitkenhead is always good) and I was still left without a shread of sympathy for her.
 
Sure, if thats how you want to describe it.

By trying my hardest do you mean a situation I'm very familiar with and jumped into my mind as soon as I read the post?

Call it what you want.
You didn't even think about how the situations were different and just posted it.
You cant be that familiar with it.
 

L Thammy

Member
Apparently she adopted her brothers with her parents' permission, and one of them went on to say that she was training him to hate white people. Yeesh. I didn't hear all this dirt on her when her story originally broke. I don't think anybody wins with this woman doing what she does.
 

Glix

Member
I know right, why won't people let white people get away with whatever they want? How dare someone comment on white privilege.
Hold on, let me find some black person that has shit all to do with this story as some wacky counterpoint because "white white white!"
Whiteness was attacked!

Yes. Because a minority of idiots on the internet were standing up for this fool woman, we "are letting white people get away with everything"

But yes, even though it took me some time to get there over the last couple of years, I acknowledge my privilege. Even as someone who has been discriminated against due to my religion I acknowledge that my whiteness lets take a lot of things for granted.

Regardless, I saw a comment that I thought was a bit hypocritical.

You have two high profile cases of white people doing this (Rachel, Warren) who get roundly criticized for it at every opportunity (with good reason) and a high profile case of a black man who did it, with seemingly good intentions, but it also can't be argued that in NY and then especially when he left the NBA to play in the Israeli league, would help his popularity and therefore bank account and has never been criticized for it, as far as I have seen.

That was the first thing that came into my mind.

I know Amares situation very well because I adored him as a Knick and I am a Jew.

If pointing that out makes me some kind of asshole and offends, because of white privilege then I am sorry, certainly not my intention.
 
Yes. Because a minority of idiots on the internet were standing up for this fool woman, we "are letting white people get away with everything"

But yes, even though it took me some time to get there over the last couple of years, I acknowledge my privilege. Even as someone who has been discriminated against due to my religion I acknowledge that my whiteness lets take a lot of things for granted.

Regardless, I saw a comment that I thought was a bit hypocritical.

You have two high profile cases of white people doing this (Rachel, Warren) who get roundly criticized for it at every opportunity (with good reason) and a high profile case of a black man who did it, with seemingly good intentions, but it also can't be argued that in NY and then especially when he left the NBA to play in the Israeli league, would help his popularity and therefore bank account and has never been criticized for it, as far as I have seen.

That was the first thing that came into my mind.

I know Amares situation very well because I adored him as a Knick and I am a Jew.

If pointing that out makes me some kind of asshole and offends, because of white privilege then I am sorry, certainly not my intention.

It has fuck all to do with this conversation about Dolezal. Wanting to be a part of a culture and trying to blacken your skin, curl your hair and actually physically pass as Black, claim you're Black is two completely different things.

Read this thread and previous threads about her. Plenty of people giving her the benefit of the doubt. Which she absolutely does not deserve.
 

Glix

Member
It has fuck all to do with this conversation about Dolezal. Wanting to be a part of a culture and trying to blacken your skin, curl your hair and actually physically pass as Black, claim you're Black is two completely different things.

Read this thread and previous threads about her. Plenty of people giving her the benefit of the doubt. Which she absolutely does not deserve.

Top point makes sense. Thank you.

Bottom point - Well, more than zero people giving her the benefit of the doubt is too many but they are still the minority (at least here on GAF)

@ Frozenprice - Well, I am lazy, you got me on that one.
 
Bottom point - Well, more than zero people giving her the benefit of the doubt is too many but they are still the minority (at least here on GAF)

The point I've continued to make is those same posters (regardless of if they're in the minority) would NOT give a Black person trying to be White the same type of understanding/compassion/benefit of the doubt/empathy.
 

Enzom21

Member
Yes. Because a minority of idiots on the internet were standing up for this fool woman, we "are letting white people get away with everything"

But yes, even though it took me some time to get there over the last couple of years, I acknowledge my privilege. Even as someone who has been discriminated against due to my religion I acknowledge that my whiteness lets take a lot of things for granted.

Regardless, I saw a comment that I thought was a bit hypocritical.

You have two high profile cases of white people doing this (Rachel, Warren) who get roundly criticized for it at every opportunity (with good reason) and a high profile case of a black man who did it, with seemingly good intentions, but it also can't be argued that in NY and then especially when he left the NBA to play in the Israeli league, would help his popularity and therefore bank account and has never been criticized for it, as far as I have seen.

That was the first thing that came into my mind.

I know Amares situation very well because I adored him as a Knick and I am a Jew.

If pointing that out makes me some kind of asshole and offends, because of white privilege then I am sorry, certainly not my intention.

It was more than a "minority of idiots" entertaining this nonsense. There were plenty of news stories discussing her minstrel show as if it were legitimate and it was only done because she is white.
Let's not forget how Micheal Jackson was treated for bleaching his skin and he didn't even claim he was white, he had vitiligo.
Amar'e Stoudemire's situation has dick all to do with this.
He didn't do anything similar to what Dolezal pulled.
Hell, even Elizabeth Warren's situation isn't comparable to Dolezal's clown show and most of the people criticizing her for it are right-wing wackjobs.

You bringing Stoudemire up was the saddest whataboutism to defend whiteness I have ever seen.

i don't know.

Okay... I am confused as to why you even responded then.
 

Glix

Member
The point I've continued to make is those same posters (regardless of if they're in the minority) would NOT give a Black person trying to be White the same type of understanding/compassion/benefit of the doubt/empathy.

I guess that is the part I am missed/am missing. It's pretty hypothetical tho, but I don't doubt that you are correct. edit - Ahh, not so hypothetical. MJ
 

Glix

Member
It was more than a "minority of idiots" entertaining this nonsense. There were plenty of news stories discussing her minstrel show as if it were legitimate and it was only done because she is white.
Let's not forget how Micheal Jackson was treated for bleaching his skin and he didn't even claim he was white, he had vitiligo.
Amar'e Stoudemire's situation has dick all to do with this.
He didn't do anything similar to what Dolezal pulled.
Hell, even Elizabeth Warren's situation isn't comparable to Dolezal's clown show and most of the people criticizing her for it are right-wing wackjobs.

You bringing Stoudemire up was the saddest whataboutism to defend whiteness I have ever seen.

.

I would say that saying you are something that you aren't for possible monetary gain is comparable in all three situations.

Rachel is above and beyond the other two, but the similarities are there. I do however understand the point that neither Warren or Amar'e are trying to adopt the physical features.

The Jackson point is well taken and very apt. That makes me see the error in what I posted more than anything else. That when a black man did something similar he was brutally attacked for it over and over again. Thats not something I considered.

I will say that Jacksons situation is as different from Rachel as Amar'e's is (double apostrophe, is that correct?), and that sometimes similar situations even if they have big differences can be brought up as part of the discussion especially in a super weird case like this.

I have to leave work now but I will read and reply to responses later if there are more, I don't like running from threads even if I am being criticized. As silly as it sounds, I learn from all of you, all the time, and would rather hear the reactions then bury my head.
 
not mention faking race attacks on her family. Or lying on her parents.

Yep. And, again, if people don't know about this story (because her shitty behavior was done over the course of many, many years) it's perfectly fine for them not to know these details. But to come into the thread and instantly proclaim they don't think she did anything "malicious" and just by default giving her the benefit of the doubt is pretty much emblematic of the problem here.

And that's not even getting into the "bu- bu- but what about transgender people!" false equivalences. The only thing those folks do is make it abundantly clear they know nothing about transgender issues on TOP of not knowing about cultural and racial appropriation.
 

Kyzer

Banned
So she wasn't "acting black." There is no specific way for us to act.

Umm yeah thats why i put it in quotes, i think the same thing of it that you do, its stupid because she thought she was being black but really just playing to stereotypes, which is racist. im saying the same thing you are. She was "acting black", which is a problem.
 
It blew up because every new piece of information about her life that came out painted a clearer picture of her as a crazy asshole.

She tried to sue a historically black college for racial discrimination because she was white. That's where I think her story actually began. This crazy broad tried to remake the plot to Soul Man.

It blew up because she was making life hell for the local police chief in her role as [can't remember, something in some local black rights group I think] and he hired an investigator to get dirt on her, the investigator got wind of her background and interviewed her parents who were happy to expose her. Then it went public.

The black college thing happened years before when she was still acting white but identifying with the black community due to her bond with her adopted younger siblings. She was teaching at the black college and, according to her, all was well until she got pregnant, then she got fired. Her lawyer, she says, told her to use the discrimination angle.

Source: The Guardian had an interview with her in their Saturday magazine last weekend which is where I assume this new debate has sprung from.

My take, from reading it, is that she had good intentions at least. Although this stuff about the Spanish student is news to me.
 

Nester99

Member
Did not read anything but the OP,


Can I get a "no shit?"

Mental illness and a liar? Get me a resume! said no employer ever.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
It blew up because she was making life hell for the local police chief in her role as [can't remember, something in some local black rights group I think] and he hired an investigator to get dirt on her, the investigator got wind of her background and interviewed her parents who were happy to expose her. Then it went public.

That version come from her? Because the way I remember it the press went to her family because of the hate crime threats she'd been posting to herself.

She brought herself down not some vindictive police chief.
 
That version come from her? Because the way I remember it the press went to her family because of the hate crime threats she'd been posting to herself.

She brought herself down not some vindictive police chief.

That's what the Guardian said happened without saying that was 'her version'. Maybe the press went to the family because the police dude tipped them off?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/25/rachel-dolezal-not-going-stoop-apologise-grovel

Actually, re-reading it, I guess it did come from her.
 
That version come from her? Because the way I remember it the press went to her family because of the hate crime threats she'd been posting to herself.

She brought herself down not some vindictive police chief.

The Guardian article makes it sound like the police chief tipped off a reporter simply because she had become a hassle but it was proooobably this:

This year, Dolezal told police she had received hate mail at the Spokane NAACP’s post office box. Nearly 200 people rallied outside the NAACP office to support her. But when police investigated the incident, they found that the envelope had no marks indicating that it gone through the mail. A postal inspector told police, “The only way this letter could have ended up in this P.O. box would be if it was placed there by someone with a key to that box or a USPS employee.” The three employees who managed the boxes said they didn’t remember seeing the envelope. The only other person with confirmed access to the box was Dolezal, who had a key.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...of_hate_crimes_the_former_naacp_official.html

^People who think she is deserving of sympathy should read that^

Edit: here's how they paint it in the Guardian:

Dolezal might still have been leading that life today. But in spring 2015, the Spokane police chief wearied of his troublesome ombudsman chair, and hired a private investigator to dig around for dirt. The PI knocked on Larry and Ruthanne’s door in Montana. All it took was a few words and old family photographs, and the chief was rid of his irritant at a stroke. The press were tipped off, the “Rachel Dolezal race faker” story broke, and within days Dolezal’s whole life lay in ruins.

No mention at all of the fact that she almost certainly faked at least one hate crime before she was exposed
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
The Guardian article makes it sound like the police chief tipped off a reporter simply because she had become a hassle but it was proooobably this:



http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...of_hate_crimes_the_former_naacp_official.html

^People who think she is deserving of sympathy should read that^

Edit: here's how they paint it in the Guardian:



No mention at all of the fact that she almost certainly faked at least one hate crime before she was exposed

Yeah the press were investigating the hate crime story, which she'd fabricated, and when they spoke to her parents the whole house of cards collapsed. If she hadn't wanted to jazz up her minority experience with some hate crime she'd probably still be doing what she was doing.

She'll never admit to doing it though so we get this new version without it all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom