In the op it says “Has a Camera (DS5 is going to have that too)”
They can take their time to release a new hw. They are the market leader, no need to rush a new hw.
And by a gamer perspective i don'treally need a more powerful console to play the very same gameplay mechanics only with bettere res/framerate. We already have powerful machines.
$500? Too much? If you put $1 in a jar every day, starting now, you'll be able to buy it with cash at launch.
Not having a go at anyone, but why can't people just learn to save up for things? You need to put aside $30 a month. Surely that's doable!
The reality could be that $499 is necessary to hit the target specs that would make for a proper jump in visuals and performance, which the devs themselves could be demanding.
More power is always needed.
Pretty sure those numbers are a lot higher.Think about it this way. How many people actually own a PS4 Pro or Xbox One X? Maybe 5 million people own a PS4 Pro. And maybe 1 million people own an X. For 90% of people a PS5 is a crazy high jump in performance.
I would be shocked if they were. These are enthusiast machines launched late in a generation, I think those numbers are optimistic.Pretty sure those numbers are a lot higher.
Wasn't pricing one of the main reasons why Sony beat Microsoft at E3 2013 and early on into 2014, in terms of sales?
$499 sounds okay but bad for Sony if Microsoft releases the Xbox scarlett at a lower price point around the same release window.
Raw power has never been the sole factor in who wins. Both PlayStation and PS2 were easily outclassed in the hardware department. Didn’t make a bit of difference, they flayed the competition. Tons of power is nice, of course, but it certainly isn’t a determining factor.MS is going to have the diskless cheap box ($299-$349) and the plus box which will be ps5 power + $100 worth of extra grunt in order to win all tech showdowns. I think it is a winning strategy as one size fits all kind of sucks.
500 * CAD + tax is going to be 755.55 for me, faack, but at the same time so long as they don't skimp on anything (8 ryzen cores is good so far...) I may be in.
I just hope they carry forward the PS4s momentum with full BC, physical and digital, which should be possible as the architectures are set to be more similar than any generational jump before (well, barring GCN-Wii). If not they're shooting themselves in the foot by losing that lead.
And then if they also allow developers to treat PS4 games like they're running on a PS4 Pro-Pro and allow patching them to run even better, they'll be rocketing out of the gate on the next gen. Advertise it as all your PS4 games, even better than ever, plus all new exclusives that can't be done on the last gen.
It's hard to believe this is what was meant by that part of the post. Why would the DS5 controller need a camera?
I've tried VR and its awesome, but yeah, make it optional.Built in camera and VR couldn't be further from what I want. They need to give up on VR
Raw power has never been the sole factor in who wins. Both PlayStation and PS2 were easily outclassed in the hardware department. Didn’t make a bit of difference, they flayed the competition. Tons of power is nice, of course, but it certainly isn’t a determining factor.
Pretty sure those numbers are a lot higher.
IR Camera for 3D motion tracking/ Inverse Kinematics maybe or for game streaming
Resogunwhat games are native 4k 60 fps....please help me.
Wasn't Xbox One X around 750k end of December 2017 just in the US?I would be shocked if they were. These are enthusiast machines launched late in a generation, I think those numbers are optimistic.
Wasn't Xbox One X around 750k end of December 2017 just in the US?
In what way?
That seems like such a waste of money though. And how much battery will it eat? Shouldn't Sony be doing inside out tracking anyway with the PSVR 2?
Where are you getting these numbers from?
Some comment in an NPD topic about how much Xbox One X outsold Ps4 Pro at launch.
Ps4 Pro was ~480k first two months in the US (Windows Central leaked the numbers)
Not win in sales, but win in digital foundry style showdowns in order to give the brand ‘best place to play’ credibility. A two prong price strategy gives you the ability to always have the strongest console without hurting sales.
I would pay five hundred and ninety nine US dollars for a MONSTERI bet it will be $399 at the end of the day. This kind of has the feeling of -gaging what the core would pay out of the gate- to it.
NPD is revenue based. There have never been any official numbers as far as I know.
It's hard to believe this is what was meant by that part of the post. Why would the DS5 controller need a camera?
More power is always needed.
Quite the change from 2013 with at par currency + rebates which got me a ps4 for $319.
I cannot speak for everyone, but my feelings on a $500 entry level console (being stupid) have nothing to do with what I would pay. I am the sort who bought a launch Pro despite having a 1080p TV just because I wanted the extra power and performance. So $500 for a beast system would not be something I cried about because of my wallet. I still think it would be utterly stupid though. The 86-90 million PS4's in the wild were not primarily sold to people like myself or yourself. They were primarily sold to the mass market / more casual gamers. For them and their parents, $500 would give sticker shock. And telling a huge chunk of people who probably net around $500 or less each week in their pay, to just start saving $30 a month (or way more depending on time between announcement and release), would not be the best form of advertising.
Waste of money? IR cameras cost pennies nowadays
That all depends on the competition. If both Sony and MS launch next gen at 499$ then we'll have no choice.They better not be crazy to think a 499 price tag is gonna be well received.
Ah! I didn't know if was that cheap. Do they drain alot of battery?
Just built a new Gaming Rig with a Ryzen chip and its been superb. A Ryzen 8 PS5 would be very tasty. Pricing might be the issue though....
That all depends on the competition. If both Sony and MS launch next gen at 499$ then we'll have no choice.
But Sony's gamble paid off and they won that one out. IIRC there was even a rumor that when MS announced the 499 price tag, Sony employees on their side of E3 were congratulating themselves saying "we won".
I'm not liking the launch price. I hope Sony look at some cheaper options. Just how powerful is this Ryzen architecture? For those of us with limited technical knowledge, is that really a big jump?
People aren't that broke
If they can spend $900 every two years for smartphone then $500 for a console that last for 7-8 year is a piece of cake
Wasn't Xbox One X around 750k end of December 2017 just in the US?
Not win in sales, but win in digital foundry style showdowns in order to give the brand ‘best place to play’ credibility. A two prong price strategy gives you the ability to always have the strongest console without hurting sales.