Well, at least they have intelligent company to back up these claims.However, much like Sega boss Mike Hayes, Sony thinks the comparison is wide of the mark.
Well, at least they have intelligent company to back up these claims.However, much like Sega boss Mike Hayes, Sony thinks the comparison is wide of the mark.
Well, we already know it will sell like ass, so I doubt there will be much fracturing going on.mj1108 said:Yes, some games will come of it but how long that lasts depends on how well it ends up selling.
[Nintex] said:Well, at least they have intelligent company to back up these claims.
Baki said:Thats not my point. My point is that Sony focus should be BETTER and more ACCESSIBLE SOFTWARE which may come from better PRECISION or a combination of OTHER factors. But their bottom line should not be the technology but the software that is offered with the technology.
Nirolak said:Sony really needs Phil Harrison back because he's the one person who really seemed to understand casual gaming at this company.
That's an advanced upgrade for the Wii.cacildo said:Michael Patcher *is* WiiHD
hey_it's_that_dog said:I understand your point, but nothing in the quotes indicates that they aren't being mindful of fun game design. Just because they didn't say it doesn't mean it's not a motivating factor.
Logically, you could be entirely right that they've built a technology and they're going to let that drive game design, but I don't think the quote you posted really warrants the argument we're having.
MrPliskin said:I wonder if a lot of you realize you contribute to the problem with gamers getting a bad rap among developers...
I mean, when move was announced and they show off things that require little precision, you scream Wii HD. If Sony says they want to go after a skill based community, you say they're missing the point.
Thing is, so many gamers have their heads up their asses. It honestly seems to me that tons of people just don't really know what they want (or they just want to play into the hive mind and enjoy the :lol with everyone else, completely devoid of their own thoughts).
Seriously, if you ignore shit like this and don't act like Gamefaqs, you won't get a bad rep. Lately though, a lot of that "gamefaqs" mentality has been spilling into my GAF...no mas, por favor.
MrPliskin said:I wonder if a lot of you realize you contribute to the problem with gamers getting a bad rap among developers...
AceBandage said:As long as PR people continue to say idiotic things, GAF will continue to ride them for it.
MrPliskin said:I wonder if a lot of you realize you contribute to the problem with gamers getting a bad rap among developers...
MrPliskin said:Well, that's unfortunate. Though I don't see what's "idiotic" about it, other than the fact you may be disappointed they didn't say it how you would have said it *shock and awe*.
There is a reason these people are paid to do this job, and you aren't.
silenthill1979 said:fixed
Originally Posted by Yenrot:
Natal will revolutionise gaming.
fixed
Baki said:However when someone says "Focusing on precision won't neccessarily allow them to expand the market". They're commenting from a business perspective (in other words, sales-gaf has arrived).
I chose him because he was heavily involved in Buzz and SingStar.MrPliskin said:You mean the same Phil Harrison that pushed Home, something that most of GAF thinks is a waste of time? It's funny how you pick and chose your knight in shining armor. Phil Harrison may have been just as misguided as the rest. It's just popular on GAF to love the guy.
*shrugs*
MrPliskin said:Well, that's unfortunate. Though I don't see what's "idiotic" about it, other than the fact you may be disappointed they didn't say it how you would have said it *shock and awe*.
There is a reason these people are paid to do this job, and you aren't.
Vinci said:I'm not trying to be arrogant here, but I'd like to ask: Why would we care what game developers think of us? I wasn't aware we were the ones out to win their favor.
I'm not saying that gamers are a wonderful community of geniuses, or anything, but your comment doesn't make the least bit of sense to me.
UltimateIke said:How much longer does anyone expect this generation of consoles to go on? Move and Natal are so unappealing at this point. Why won't they just wait a couple of years and launch their new controllers with their new systems? :'(
You took my post!MrPliskin said:I wonder if a lot of you realize you contribute to the problem with gamers getting a bad rap among developers...
I mean, when move was announced and they show off things that require little precision, you scream Wii HD. If Sony says they want to go after a skill based community, you say they're missing the point.
Thing is, so many gamers have their heads up their asses. It honestly seems to me that tons of people just don't really know what they want (or they just want to play into the hive mind and enjoy the :lol with everyone else, completely devoid of their own thoughts).
Seriously, if you ignore shit like this and don't act like Gamefaqs, you won't get a bad rep. Lately though, a lot of that "gamefaqs" mentality has been spilling into my GAF...no mas, por favor.
You mean the same Phil Harrison that pushed Home, something that most of GAF thinks is a waste of time? It's funny how you pick and chose your knight in shining armor. Phil Harrison may have been just as misguided as the rest. It's just popular on GAF to love the guy.
*shrugs*
companies offer products, you choose to buy or not.I completely agree with you here. Companies serve us, not the other way round.
left_senseless said:in the end it will be up to the developers to make sure that the controls are suitable for the everyman (woman) and the hardcore at the same time.
Baki said:I was agreeing with the sarcasm. :lol :lol
It's the principle. The only reason Sony gives a shit about motion control is because they want a piece of Nintendo's market. If those guys are so smart, why don't they think of something else that's disruptive and universally* appealing?Mako_Drug said:Why does everyone assume Sony believes Move will somehow magically transport them to number 1 in the console warz and be a huge success in with the Wii crowd? I don't think they've said either of these things and yet people berate them for it regardless...
mr_nothin said:Well hell, idk about the rest of you guys but I'd rather have a controller that's hardcore and appeals to the hardcore rather than having a controller just built around basic "fun" and "pick up and play". Thats why I dont like the Wii and why I have some hope for the MOVE. I like this direction. Whether it'll sells or flops, I dont care.
Well, that's what you think...I think most of you are missing the point.
Byakuya769 said:I guess they're trying to create a peripheral that inspires people to continue to play past the box opening and get-togethers....
tzare said:companies offer products, you choose to buy or not.
Well DUH, we know that they're going to offer those type of games. I knew this was going to be posted, predictable.[Nintex] said:![]()
Well, that's what you think...
facepalm...ShockingAlberto said:Then they should probably not have clones of Wii games
Because that, like, confuses people about it not being an HD Wii
mr_nothin said:Well hell, idk about the rest of you guys but I'd rather have a controller that's hardcore and appeals to the hardcore rather than having a controller just built around basic "fun" and "pick up and play". Thats why I dont like the Wii and why I have some hope for the MOVE. I like this direction. Whether it'll sells or flops, I dont care.
I dont get some ppl on here. When MOVE was announced, everyone was all "ITS THE WII!!" and now that they're trying to separate themselves from the "pickup & play" style of the wii....they're missing the point? I think most of you are missing the point.
I'd rather have a controller that caters to me (someone that has a PS3 and enjoys it alot) than to have hope for for the MOVE and be disappointed because they're trying to appeal to people that dont even have a PS3. What's wrong with sticking to the "easy to use, difficult to master" theory? That's what makes games accessible AND appealing to the hardcore. The whole reason I'm even remotely excited about the MOVE is because it's being positioned not to alienate the hardcore and hopefully they actually pull it off.
.
Do you want to know the actual answer?Mako_Drug said:Why does everyone assume Sony believes Move will somehow magically transport them to number 1 in the console warz and be a huge success in with the Wii crowd? I don't think they've said either of these things and yet people berate them for it regardless...
the thing is, 'WE' , does not really exist. Yo, and me and every gamer is different. And those PR quotes are usually headed to a specific audience,sometimes the media, sometimes casuals, sometimes hardcore.... but we all read it and judge from our personal situation XDVinci said:Absolutely true.
Still doesn't remove the bizarre notion that we should actively care how we're viewed by these companies. Is any MW2 fan unaware of the fact that Kotick likely views him as a pathetic, mindless sheep? Doesn't matter.
They're taking it a step further.dsister44 said:mainly this thing is stupid
I think with Move its all about appealing to skill. Its about the learning curve thats built into the experience. It provides that satisfaction youre talking about. The more you play the better you get. Thats part and parcel of the traditional gaming experience.
he is trying to differentiate it from the wii by saying that people will enjoy the challenge of the learning curve, that for traditional gamer using motion controls is a whole new skill. as you play your skills will get better and you will be able to achieve more. How is that different?
wii sports offered pick up and play party gaming, whilst you had the traditional experience of working your way through all the challenges and going after the gold medals. Same with WSR and the stamp system. offering content for gamers who want a challenge is not something new that MOVE will bring since wii did that from day one
Oh man, case in point.mr_nothin said:Well DUH, we know that they're going to offer those type of games. I knew this was going to be posted, predictable.
I said that they arent going to ALIENATE the hardcore. It's much better than just sticking to a bunch of party games. I also said that I hope that they can deliver on that "promise". I'm still not super stoked for MOVE because all of the games that they've shown thus far are just Wii knock off party games. I'm excited but cautious.
facepalm...
To me, they're saying that it's going to be accessible but they're going to offer that precision. So if the hardcore wants to try to learn how to use the MOVE really well...then there's enough depth there to separate themselves from the newbies. Easy to use, Difficult to Master. That's what I'm getting out of this and their philosophy is still consistent with the philosophy they had when they revealed it at E3 last year. Of course they're going to try to cash in on the casuals with easy to make/low cost games. They've always had these type of games.
Just because they are going a more "hardcore" route doesnt mean they cant offer more than 1 type of game. Duh...they're still going to offer and show off casual games. Stop being so closed minded.
I do not see the MOVE as any sort of revolution for Sony. I dont even think it'll sell well. I'm just giving my position on it. I dont care who's on top. I like a company for what type of quality it provides. If that quality starts to dwindle so will my interest. I'm not a blind fanboy. :lolShockingAlberto said:Oh man, case in point.
My position exactly. I see what he's saying and I'm hoping they go that route but I dont believe him and I dont think they will execute it well.Leondexter said:I see what he's saying...in a nutshell, he's making Move out to be what I wish the Wii could've been--a system with motion controlled games that aren't all "casual".
But I don't believe him. I don't believe that the majority of the games won't be casual (including their own Wii Sports knockoff). I don't believe that the majority of the games won't be crap (which is not the same thing). And I don't believe that this add-on will get decent support for "hardcore" games.
It's too bad, because I would like a "better" Wii with more support of traditional game genres. But the Move won't be it. Maybe the PS4 will be, someday.
spons said:The only thing that shocks me right now is the move games library. They shouldn't have announced this thing with a bunch of mini-games and non-motion games with 'move support' but rather with a crapload of games that resemble SMG 2 in terms of quality. Sony needs to gain trust from their userbase and right now they're failing in doing so.
Kandrick said:What ?
Does that sound like he's trying to back off from taking on the Wii? It's a complimentary product... to the Wii?Its inevitable that people would say this is Wii on PS3, UK PR boss David Wilson told MCV. But we see it as a complimentary product. Its a different proposition."
The main issue working against them in this regard is that it's an optional peripheral. Peripherals that don't come with a system from launch date on aren't as likely to get a lot of support from developers. Look how Motion+ is doing over on the Wii, or countless other examples over the past decades.Leondexter said:And I don't believe that this add-on will get decent support for "hardcore" games.