0.1.1.2.3.5.8.13.21.34.55
Banned
yo dude, modern warfare isn't about speed and mobility, its about being top heavy and support by toothpick thin legs... WISE UP!So guys... AT-ATs, worst tank design of all time or what?
yo dude, modern warfare isn't about speed and mobility, its about being top heavy and support by toothpick thin legs... WISE UP!So guys... AT-ATs, worst tank design of all time or what?
So it supports Playstation Move too? No, PSN store info (besides the officially provided game description of course) is just some guy ticking off some template values.
Higher quality version.
1080p 30fps 18Mbps 280MB
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_star_wars_battlefront_trailer-34479_en.html
I would say the micro detail is basically par. But back on the topic at hand.The most impressive improvements over BF4 to me here are the high quality material shaders, high quality motion blur and high quality animation. Lighting is probably combination of precomputed and realtime, like in BF4. BF4 already had some of the most impressive character animation I've seen, so I doubt they'd regress there. However, it won't have this kind of hand-scripted animation, of course. It looks like a natural improvement over BF4 to me, with added PBR, better assets/art and more complex lighting much of which is precomputed probably. Micro detail and characters don't look as good as TO1886, which is natural for a non-linear game. As for 60FPS, the game will likely be 30-60FPS much like BF4 multi, and running in 900p.
So now the backpedaling begins.
Not really, just placeholder text.
I don't think they would have the final resolution down just yet. If it is 720p on PS4;
A. The game must look incredible
B. Xbox One though....
Its possible it's just a placeholder though, 900p on PS4 is a safe bet.
People need to lower expectations at 60fps
You know how you could quiet skeptics?
Show us some fucking gameplay instead of cutscene crap.
Have it playable at E3 on the show floor.
Because the damage is already done. That tweet image is now all over the place. It got some people hyped. Then they released their "just like gameplay" trailer and now they have the GameStop preorder insanity going on.Why do people even bother lying if they're going to be wrong the very next day? For fucks sake, I'm sure the game will look awesome. Just say it will look awesome and move on.
Footage
vs
Game
A .gif by NeoGAF
Feels like we're witnessing another Watch Dogs scenario in the making.I like the last paragraph.
The downgrade thread is going to be so sweet.
I would say the micro detail is basically par. But back on the topic at hand.
Lets not forget how BF4 looked and ran on the PS4 whilst having horriblelod, bad IQ, and decidedly less geometric detail, shader complexity, and no SSR
vs.
then the above at a 900p upscale (still having the IQ)
Who said BF4 didn't look good?
Are people saying Battlefront won't look good? No. They are simply saying that what was shown was a bunch of fluff. Rightful so...you can't blame them. It's simply a company trying to sell their product, of course they want it to look good.
They did the same thing with the Mirror's Edge 2 reveal. "EVERYTHING IS IN ENGINE" Wow...Neat. Now we will wait and see how the actual game turns out.
then the above at a 900p upscale (still having the IQ)
Jesus christ BF4 was a cross-gen game.
Battlefront is a current/next-gen ONLY game.
Jesus christ BF4 was a cross-gen game.
Battlefront is a current/next-gen ONLY game.
I'm still trying to figure out where it was stated this was going to be 60fps on consoles.but Will it be 60 fps or dice 60 fps?
Feels like we're witnessing another Watch Dogs scenario in the making.
I'm still trying to figure out where it was stated this was going to be 60fps on consoles.
Feels like we're witnessing another Watch Dogs scenario in the making.
It ran at very solid 60FPS during SP campaign, from which that scene is from. Game looked outstanding on PS4 during many of its scenes, almost unbelievably good for a 60FPS game to me, and it was their first game on the platform, rushed for launch and probably not even remotely as tightly optimized as this game can be. Implementing GPU particles and PBR probably wouldn't cost them much performance anyway.Lets not forget how BF4 looked and ran on the PS4 whilst having horriblelod, bad IQ, and decidedly less geometric
Ok, thank you.stevivor.com/2015/04/dice-star-wars-battlefront-will-run-at-60fps-across-all-three-platforms-aiming-for-photo-realism/
There is a thread on the front page.
trailer has to be single player
DICE cant make a game were vehicles are not OP
Yes, but that shot is from 30fps single player. Add multiplayer and you lose visual quality already, then add 60fps, and it drops even more.
It ain't gonna be that much better than BF4 singleplayer, if not very close.
Jesus christ BF4 was a cross-gen game.
Battlefront is a current/next-gen ONLY game.
There is no single player buds. So I don't know where you're getting your info from.
There is no single player buds. So I don't know where you're getting your info from.
BF4's campaign was 60fps and held up quite well.Yes, but that shot is from 30fps single player. Add multiplayer and you lose visual quality already, then add 60fps, and it drops even more.
It ain't gonna be that much better than BF4 singleplayer, if not very close.
stevivor.com/2015/04/dice-star-wars-battlefront-will-run-at-60fps-across-all-three-platforms-aiming-for-photo-realism/
There is a thread on the front page.
I'm not the only one thinking "don't believe their lies" right...?
Nope.
Pretty trailer leads to hype. Hype leads to disappointment. Disappointment leads to the dark side.
There is no single player buds. So I don't know where you're getting your info from.
I wonder if we'll be able to pick race and gender or if those are just tied to the classes(if there are classes).