C4lukin2
Banned
The Guardian is the worst. Because they have a subscription model, they have just random ads on their website, and then they ask for private contributions on top of that. So that they continue to spread there particular politics, while you will see a PS4 add, or any number of clickbait garbage, while asking for you to subscribe or donate, so that they can stay independent.
Now Wikipedia is a different matter. And I have been ok with it for the most part, because it was dependent on contributions...
But this Holiday season, they explained that 98% percent turn the the other way.
As if we are simply ignoring the truth. A lot of various Wiki articles, some disagree with.
But whatever the case, the message they sent was 98% of us just turn the other way.
No, you present an awesome service, that very often when it coMes to who knows a lot about a few things, you get it totally wrong.
Wikipedia is not definitive.
But I am fine with them, let’s say use advertising banners instead of begging for the other 98%. to contribute.
Just a single ad each month. Let’s say Frozen 2. for December. Considering the amount of views, that would be a 100 million dollar month. Or even bigger then that you get into MS , or Tesla, or whatever.
Point being. Each month Wikipedia could get a single advertisement from a mostly not controversial company, and still ask for private contributions. They can remain solid, just make sure the company with the banner is keeping up a certain level of goodness..
Now Wikipedia is a different matter. And I have been ok with it for the most part, because it was dependent on contributions...
But this Holiday season, they explained that 98% percent turn the the other way.
As if we are simply ignoring the truth. A lot of various Wiki articles, some disagree with.
But whatever the case, the message they sent was 98% of us just turn the other way.
No, you present an awesome service, that very often when it coMes to who knows a lot about a few things, you get it totally wrong.
Wikipedia is not definitive.
But I am fine with them, let’s say use advertising banners instead of begging for the other 98%. to contribute.
Just a single ad each month. Let’s say Frozen 2. for December. Considering the amount of views, that would be a 100 million dollar month. Or even bigger then that you get into MS , or Tesla, or whatever.
Point being. Each month Wikipedia could get a single advertisement from a mostly not controversial company, and still ask for private contributions. They can remain solid, just make sure the company with the banner is keeping up a certain level of goodness..
Last edited: