mcz117chief
Member
Those three you mentioned aren't really anything I would consider especially good. Halo 5 is easily among the worst FPS games I played, right next to such wonderful things like Battlefield 3 or Black Ops 3. Any Call of Duty (except BO3) I have played (and I played plenty) is far superior to all the mentioned games. There have been some pretty good FPS games this gen, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, Star Wars Battlefront 2 (multiplayer only), Rainbow Six Siege, Battlefield 1, Shadow Warrior 2, TitanFall 1 and a few more.if Halo 5 is a bad game then 90% of this generations FPS games are bad games... because it is better than 90% of them, easily... including every single Call of Duty released this generation... except maybe Modern Warfare reboot, which is alright.
and the reticle not being 2/3 down is by far the least of Halo 5's issues lol.
Halo 5 is a bad Halo game, just like Halo 4 was... but better compared to almost any shooter on the market, except for Titanfall 2, Doom 2016 and maybe Wolfenstein
Boring environments besides Sanghelios
People keep saying that and when I bought Halo 5 I was expecting something awesome. What the hell is so special about Sanghelios? Literally just brown rocks and then a small covenant fort in the middle of the ocean. It is literally nothing. I don't understand why that was hyped and not the cool Space Elevator climb, because that was genuinely the only good memorable part of the game.
This is another one. i still think the PS2 battlefront is better
Lol it isn't. Try to play it again today. The very first one is better than the original second but current second is by far the best Star Wars Battlefront. They really did a ton of work on it and right now it sits at a fantastic place. I haven't had so much fun with Star Wars Battlefront since the original.
Last edited: