Psycho_Mantis
Banned
time to riot
Like I said the FAQ is probably outdated.
The Post provides scores to us.
https://twitter.com/metacritic/status/730813790472818689
I think its pretty crazy they even had that though.Maybe:
AP: "Wow, what a great game 4/4." link
AP: "We gave it a score of 4. It's on the WP site."
MC: "This one? Yeah, you guys did not like it."
Although none of the other reviews MC has collected was AP.
Like I said the FAQ is probably outdated.
The Post provides scores to us.
https://twitter.com/metacritic/status/730813790472818689
lol. Yeah lets score this review without a score even though there's a section dedicated to that. Oh, and after 88 reviews the lowest score is an 80, but here comes a 40! Makes sense
Series should have ended after 1? Why the hell you are giving such a troll to review this?
Here I hate the Mass Effect series, my review for the unreleased Mass Effect 4: "Should have ended after 1", like seriously this is dumb.
It's a joke
Then why hasn't the review been removed from Metacritic?
...It's in the Comic Riffs section. How is anyone taking this seriously?
Then why hasn't the review been removed from Metacritic?
.Why hasn't the reviewer been removed from The Washington Post that's more surprising.
You guys are fucking strange, man
Nah its not fake.Wait I'm confused. So did WP post a fake review and Metacritix took it seriously and posted it?
Wait I'm confused. So did WP post a fake review and Metacritix took it seriously and posted it?
Wait I'm confused. So did WP post a fake review and Metacritix took it seriously and posted it?
Wait I'm confused. So did WP post a fake review and Metacritix took it seriously and posted it?
Bloodborne and The Order: 1886 reviews are in WP's Comic Riff section. Same reviewer for both. And both without scores on their pages. Yet the WP critic score on Metacritic is 100 for Bloodborne and 40 for The Order. ¯\_(ツ _/¯
And the WP guy who reviewed UC4 also reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess HD. No score on page. But the WP critic score for TP is 100.
http://www.metacritic.com/publication/washington-post?filter=games
Bloodborne and The Order: 1886 reviews are in WP's Comic Riff section. Same reviewer for both. And both without scores on their pages. Yet the WP critic score on Metacritic is 100 for Bloodborne and 40 for The Order. ¯_(ツ _/¯
And the WP guy who reviewed UC4 also reviewed The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess HD. No score on page. But the WP critic score for TP is 100.
http://www.metacritic.com/publication/washington-post?filter=games
WP review posted in category Entertainment, 4/4 (10)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ente...6beb2a-1773-11e6-971a-dadf9ab18869_story.html
New WP review posted under Comic Riff, negative read as 4/10:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...part-series-should-have-ended-after-part-one/
Both reviews are from AP contributors
Seems like a wild troll.
I like the spirit of that review if not the substance. There's room for criticism (and lots to criticise in UC4) that I haven't seen in the reviews. I'm sure opinion will shift as we get further away from release and maybe people will write about it then.
I like the spirit of that review if not the substance. There's room for criticism (and lots to criticise in UC4) that I haven't seen in the reviews. I'm sure opinion will shift as we get further away from release and maybe people will write about it then.
People here have posted and discuss many criticisms.I like the spirit of that review if not the substance. There's room for criticism (and lots to criticise in UC4) that I haven't seen in the reviews. I'm sure opinion will shift as we get further away from release and maybe people will write about it then.
who cares people, just some ones opinion, just play the game
who cares people, just some ones opinion, just play the game
I like the spirit of that review if not the substance. There's room for criticism (and lots to criticise in UC4) that I haven't seen in the reviews. I'm sure opinion will shift as we get further away from release and maybe people will write about it then.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=203117482&postcount=56
How do you know if there's lots to criticise in UC4? Especially that you haven't seen in reviews?
Overall MC down to 93.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=203117482&postcount=56
How do you know if there's lots to criticise in UC4? Especially that you haven't seen in reviews?
Okay I didn't really mind it. But going back through this thread and seeing that ND dev actually really cared that the joke review was counted. Now I want them to remove it, that dudes game that he worked his ass off on is being unfairly judged, and whether we like it or not Metacritic is the ultimate way that games are judged.
If it offends ND, and even more so if salaries are dependent on something like that, I really think they should remove it.