I like him.
Yet in the case of Sandy Hook, Adam Lanza walked into his mother's home and walked out with the weapons he needed.
And yet you're ignoring the fact that his mother herself was deeply mentally disturbed. She amassed a huge number of weapons and ammunition preparing for "The end times" which she saw as coming soon. She was a survivalist who fed her paranoia into her children, which arguably lead to Adam Lanza becoming what he became.
So what your saying is that the problem is mental health...
And the fact that crazy people can obtain firearms.
So what your saying is that the problem is mental health...
Your Anders Breiviks will still exist, but your George Zimmermans, your Adam Lanzas, and your random neighborhood burglars won't be able to kill, if you don't make guns so easily accessible (legally or otherwise).
And yet you're ignoring the fact that his mother herself was deeply mentally disturbed. She amassed a huge number of weapons and ammunition preparing for "The end times" which she saw as coming soon. She was a survivalist who fed her paranoia into her children, which arguably lead to Adam Lanza becoming what he became.
Most of these measures seems to be placebo effects aimed at his constituency rather than any kind of meaningful long term solution. Take for example background checks: they ought to be imposed in every single legal arm sale, otherwise it would be pointless, but hey, that's pre-emptive compromise Obama for you I guess.
Bonus: No mental healthcare initiative or whatsoever either.
Most of these measures seems to be placebo effects aimed at his constituency rather than any kind of meaningful long term solution. Take for example background checks: they ought to be imposed in every single legal arm sale, otherwise it would be pointless, but hey, that's pre-emptive compromise Obama for you I guess.
Bonus: No mental healthcare initiative or whatsoever either.
Lol. See this is why we barely have any regs now. You seem to be under the impression that laws are designed to prevent *all* crime. They aren't. Never have never will. You have no solutions except "derp shootings happen regardless so fuck trying to do something".You are deeply delusional if you believe that by banning semi-automatic weapons it will prevent shootings like Lanza and Zimmerman's shootings from happening. You can make things harder to obtain, but as long as a person can buy a gun (any gun) legally there are going to be shootings. I honestly can't believe some of the stuff I'm reading in this thread. This regulation is an empty gesture. People are acting like Obama has shoved an olive branch up the NRA's ass.
What we want to do, at least, is stop the people who don't *really* want a gun. We want to stop someone from buying guns for their (prohibited) friends because it is so easy and casual, with not even a background check. We want to stop the casual gun owners who don't protect their guns and have them easily stolen by criminals. Get rid of the loopholes and require effective background checks, stop making it so easy to get guns that you'd practically have to go out of your way to avoid them, and we'll cut down on the number that reach the wrong hands.
And keep in mind, guns in the hands of such casual owners, who would be stopped by background checks or possibly training checks (not sure on that), does no good. They are not prepared to use them properly. But it does harm. Because they give them to bad people and have them stolen by bad people.
Lol. See this is why we barely have any regs now. You seem to be under the impression that laws are designed to prevent *all* crime. They aren't. Never have never will. You have no solutions except "derp shootings happen regardless so fuck trying to do something".
I've never claimed to have any solutions. It's not my job. I think this is a widespread cultural and mental health issue. I never said that laws are designed to prevent all crime. I said that these measures will not prevent gun violence or shootings and they won't. As the other poster said (and I stated the same thing earlier in this thread), these are empty gestures. Nothing can be done so something has to be done no matter how inane that something ends up being.
"Nothing can be done", do you honestly believe that?
No, nothing can be done.
Well that's a depressing way to look at things. Do you expect your country to stay exactly like it is now for eternity?
Guns are not hard to obtain in Europe as well. But all the waiting time and paperwork make them undesirable for most people. Mental checks and psychological evaluation help prevent unstable persons to easily obtain a gun. That's all that's needed. And I am strongly for firearm registration.You are deeply delusional if you believe that by banning semi-automatic weapons it will prevent shootings like Lanza and Zimmerman's shootings from happening. You can make things harder to obtain, but as long as a person can buy a gun (any gun) legally there are going to be shootings. I honestly can't believe some of the stuff I'm reading in this thread. This regulation is an empty gesture. People are acting like Obama has shoved an olive branch up the NRA's ass.
If these measures prevent even one gun murder, aren't they worth it?
If these measures prevent even one gun murder, aren't they worth it?
I don't torture myself with hypotheticals. Do not be surprised if you see violent crime and gun murders rise after these measures are taken.
If that shotgun has a barrel length of less than 18 inches or an overall length of less than 26 with the stock folded, you are a felon.
I wouldn't be putting that in print very often. Ms. Napolitano's "See Something, Say Something" program might catch up with you.
If the barrel's less than 18", you got trouble there.
Lol. It's not. It's exactly 18 inches. I had it checked out at the gun shop. Also not less than 26 folded.*facepalms at daw840*
This makes no sense at all. And you just said no change can happen? Suddenly a change for the worse is imminent after these regulations?
Logical consistency isn't so important when you're blindly holding on to bias for dear life.
For you to be so anti gun you sure love sniping.
Well don't you think maybe you should start coming up with some solutions, guy?I've never claimed to have any solutions. It's not my job.
Third, Australia had 1/100th the amount of firearms America has. In 1996, one of their worst years for homicides. They totaled a whopping 516. Thats right. 16 more than Chicago alone. Since the BUY-BACK PROGRAM, which America already has in various states. They average 300. Not since gun control, not since gun bans.
I don't torture myself with hypotheticals. Do not be surprised if you see violent crime and gun murders rise after these measures are taken.
Guy who claims to have committed multiple felonies defends right to own gun. Gun enthusiasts applaud.
I'm actually quite pro gun. Just not 'any & all regulation = bad' like yourself and Bornstellar. That's the same group that believes Sandy Hook was an anti-gun conspiracy, btw. Good company to keep.
Wouldn't research on the impact of violent video games on children fall under the wheelhouse of the NIH instead of the CDC?
Huh?
The amount of money that has come into the gun industry since these talks started is insane. They should start a rumor about banning something new every month, economy would be booming.
Im perfectly ok with them fixing the gun show loophole, and stricter background checks, but are they going to look into peoples private files skipping doctor patient confidentiality?
I'm actually quite pro gun. Just not 'any & all regulation = bad' like yourself and Bornstellar. That's the same group that believes Sandy Hook was an anti-gun conspiracy, btw. Good company to keep.
Lol. See this is why we barely have any regs now. You seem to be under the impression that laws are designed to prevent *all* crime. They aren't. Never have never will. You have no solutions except "derp shootings happen regardless so fuck trying to do something".
Is a .50 Desert Eagle handgun allowed for private ownership?
I've used it in a few games and Dayum!
Yeah, those wooden hunting rifles were originally designed to kill humans in combat, too. Don't kid yourself about that. They just lightened them up and de-ruggedized them so that they wouldn't be unnecessarily heavy for Grandpa Jack to lug them around from blind to blind.They're more scary looking because their ergonomics are designed to more efficiently kill other humans in combat -- vs wooden hunting rifles that are designed to kill animals.
If this were true, the US Marine Corps would be issuing 10/22s.Wouldn't a more comfortable, lighter gun be more efficient at killing than an uncofortable, heavier gun?
Ultimately though that begs the question: why is gun violence any worse than any other kind of violence?
Ultimately though that begs the question: why is gun violence any worse than any other kind of violence?
Would you rather be the victim of fist violence or gun violence?
One type has a much larger chance to kill than the other