HD versions.
We'll get UHD versions of this gen's HD versions.
HD versions.
Sony.
They did nothing right this generation.
I wouldn't miss them.
HD repackages.
Voice Chat.
Achievements.
Motion Controls.
Online multiplayer.
Demos.
umm. . . Apps.
Well Sony has to look at things as a business. Putting money into something that continues to be profitable is a great way to spend money, helps give them more money to spend resoucres on other things that aren't Home. Besides, these days so many other companies create content for Home (that Sony get a cut of) that I don't think they put that many resources into it bar the client itself, the occasional space and managing the whole thing.It affects me when the resources would be better used elsewhere in my opinion. I'm sure it's profitable, but so is Angry Birds.
It's a matter of opinion.
Superior versions of great games at bargain prices for systems which have HDMI output: they've gotta go.
Unless it's freeAs others have said, day one DLC. An atrocious practice.
Charging for multiplayer access
Unlocking better weapons/abilities with progression.
Sony.
They did nothing right this generation.
I wouldn't miss them.
This is not true. The first PS3 was region free and it was patched into the system in 3.55 FW
Console manufacturers have to be very careful region locking systems in Australia. As soon as a system is locked here, modchips become legal to own and sell
No more set in stone pricing for every new game...a bit of this has already started, but we need more 39-49 dollar games...
Shootbang oversaturation.
"Mature audience" driven titles.
Trickle-out release schedules for things like PS1 classics, Virtual Console, Neo Geo Station, etc etc etc.
Please stop doing this.
Entitlement.
If they put out one thousand games at the same time, 90% of them would go unnoticed. I can't really blame Nintendo for releasing them at a trickle.
But maybe they could release them faster, I don't deny that.
Entitlement.