Aaronrules380
Member
1. its face is more similar to pikachu's than either of those
2. pointy tail
3. colored like its element
4. fat
5. you take this way too seriously
By this logic, emolga and pacharisu aren't pikachu clones though.
1. its face is more similar to pikachu's than either of those
2. pointy tail
3. colored like its element
4. fat
5. you take this way too seriously
By this logic, emolga and pacharisu aren't pikachu clones though.
Marill isn't a pikaclone. The only reason anyone thinks of it as such is the pikablu rumors
The only trait it shares with pikachu clones is being rodentish. It lacks the cheek puches and the electric typingIt isn't? I mean, yeah, Pikablu is certainly contributing a bit, but it does look rather Pikachu-y. Only thing it lacks is the cheek pouches/circles.
Anyway, I like Emolga. I found it to be actually useful, and the only one of the Pika-clones that actually can be an absolute pain to fight (damn you Elesa!).
Pachirisu because of Se Jun Park.
The only trait it shares with pikachu clones is being rodentish. It lacks the cheek puches and the electric typing
I don't think it needs the electric typing to be a clone. I would also argue that since (if you consider it one) it was the first clone, the "rules" weren't set just yet.
And there are other rodent-pokemon (Rattata/Raticate, for example) that aren't the same relative body shape/style. Its fairly Pikachu-like.
the first pika clone was pichu, not Marill
Minun and Plusle and Emolga
Emolga, not even close.
GTFO Pachirisu fans
If we're sticking super close, then its Emolga.
Depending how strict we're being, Shinx!
Arguably, Riolu!
Emolga, It was my main in a wonderlock, one of my favs ever since
Best one
de ne ne