This mentality bothers me more than it should.
I'd rather a movie be flamboyantly risk taking and fail horrendously on its face on every step of the way over a competently executed great film that is forgotten the second I leave the theater.
Batman v Superman vs Civil War, I guess.
I really liked The Force Awakens, but I really wish it wasn't so safe. I'm down for a crazy Episode 8.
A Kylo redemption arc would be a huge bummer.
I actually liked the Prequels more than The Force Awakens. That's because it took so many risks, and I found that more refreshing than The Force Awakens. Which was just a retrend of A New Hope and relied too much on nostalgia.
Aren't Disney the ones who took the EU out of canon and are cherry picking it? That's pretty hands on if you ask me?
So you'd rather eat a turd than reheat last night's supper?
But in the end you have a terrible film, a terrible film doesn't win points for taking risks, especially if it fails at the vast majority of things that make a great film. Let alone consistently failing three different times. ¬_¬ Our kids are gonna fondly remember episode 7 and not just because it has nice visuals.This mentality bothers me more than it should.
I'd rather a movie be flamboyantly risk taking and fail horrendously on its face on every step of the way over a competently executed great film that is forgotten the second I leave the theater.
Batman v Superman vs Civil War, I guess.
I really liked The Force Awakens, but I really wish it wasn't so safe. I'm down for a crazy Episode 8.
If the force awakens was a turd then what does that make three films that are objectively worse in terms of what makes a good film?Yes, I would rather. Really rolling my eyes at the passive aggressive comment. You know what was a turd, The Force Awakens.
So the fanboy wars have started in here too huh.
"insult, "personal shot", "attack"... I think you are dramatizing.
If it makes you feel better, I don't actually think you put feces in your mouth (ugh). It was a metaphor illustrating the importance of quality over originality. The latter is valuable but for naught without the former.
Disney is fairly risk-averse. A movie as big as Star Wars, mainline Star Wars, will take no risks except what is thoroughly market-tested in advance as not a risk at all. Were Finding Dory and most of the Marvel movies risky?
People say this but an ant man movie, Thor films, black panther... There's nothing safe about these characters.
People say this but an ant man movie, Thor films, black panther... There's nothing safe about these characters.
Being 8 when they came out isnt the best reason
JJ Abrams said:"I can understand that someone might say, 'Oh, it's a complete rip-off!' " he says, adding, "What was important for me was introducing brand new characters using relationships that were embracing the history that we know to tell a story that is new — to go backwards to go forwards."
LOL, I wasn't 8 when they came out. Insulting me based on my views on the Prequels is what makes you a 8 year old (mentally)
The fact that you are just still talking down to me is interesting. I'm not hurt at all.
LOL, I wasn't 8 when they came out. Insulting me based on my views on the Prequels is what makes you a 8 year old (mentally)
You fooled me.
it's a cheap shot but don't let that detract from the matter at hand. the prequels are fucking garbage movies from top to bottom. so while you're entitled to your opinion it is awful.
Whoops you are entitled to your opinion too, but I find the Prequels to be good films and I thought The Force Awakens to be a terrible movie. Your opinion is also awful.
I think I'm more forgiving with the prequels than some because they were my gateway to Star Wars when I was a kid, but I felt TFA captured the magic of Star Wars better than any of them. It wasn't as ambitious but it had better performances, characters that I felt more invested in and it made me excited for the future of the franchise again. It has its problems - I'm not a big fan of Starkiller base either - but it was a great start and a good foundation for Rian and Colin to build on.
I'm sure you've been asked this many times, but what is your take on the Plinkett-reviews?
I watched it somewhat and couldn't watch it all the way through. It was extremely insulting.
![]()
I'm sorry dude, but what about the Plinkett-reviews feels insulting to you?
The fact that he uses that dull voice during the whole thing to be insulting. I couldn't get through that video. Not sorry..
Sounds a whole lot like projecting. He used the voice in the Generations review because his normal voice was too boring to listen to for 40+ minutes.
Taking more risks like... the prequel trilogy? No thanks.
The film got critical raves and made 2 billion.
I am genuinely astounded that people actually think that they could've made a better film, or that the team who made the film should've done anything differently.
Like, I don't care for The Avengers at all. But the film I'd have made? Would not have been a film that'd make 1.5 billion. There's nothing wrong with thinking a film isn't the one you'd want, but to seriously believe they should have taken risks and experimented? It is actually delusional thinking.
Whoops my bad. But I find interesting how you recommend me those reviews. As if that's going to change my mind. The whole Protagonist of the The Phantom Menace he started going on about? It's actually Qui Gon Jinn
A not very good film(BvS) over a great film that does everything better(CW)???This mentality bothers me more than it should.
I'd rather a movie be flamboyantly risk taking and fail horrendously on its face on every step of the way over a competently executed great film that is forgotten the second I leave the theater.
Batman v Superman vs Civil War, I guess.
I really liked The Force Awakens, but I really wish it wasn't so safe. I'm down for a crazy Episode 8.
So you missed out the more in-depth stuff that happens after the first 20 minutes in the first review, as well the reviews for 2 and 3 (which in my opinion are a lot better at describing what makes good movies good)?
I'm not recommending them, I'm just saying that I've never met someone who likes the prequels after watching the Plinkett-reviews.
This mentality bothers me more than it should.
I'd rather a movie be flamboyantly risk taking and fail horrendously on its face on every step of the way over a competently executed great film that is forgotten the second I leave the theater.
Batman v Superman vs Civil War, I guess.
I really liked The Force Awakens, but I really wish it wasn't so safe. I'm down for a crazy Episode 8.
The Force Awakens is mediocre and dull.
The prequels are rancid examples on how not to do filmmaking.
Let's keep things in perspective here folks, this is a 7-film franchise where about 2.5 films are above-average.
What makes movies good is subjective in my opinion. Also it's funny how you immediately assume that I wont like the Prequels if I watch the Plinkett reviews. You know what the Prequels did better than The Force Awakens, world building. People act like what he says is fact when it's really just his opinion.
They made a fortune with JJ's smooth jazz, by the numbers style. They'll stick with that even if he's not directing again.
I believe it was Ford's condition for replaying the character.
Pretty much. They had a franchise to pull from the gutter against the utmost skepticism. Going "we get what good Star Wars feels like" is the best thing they could have done to catch people up and settle fears.I am tired of people acting like Ep 7 being what it was is a bad choice.
They did the right thing. The idea Ep 7 should've been experimental is an utterly delusional concept by people who should never be allowed anywhere near a writing pad, let alone a camera.
Uhh, I'm specifically saying that I've never met anyone before who liked the prequels after watching the reviews, which means that I'm not exactly denying you of your opinions.
And yes, movies are subjective. I love Neon Demon, everyone else I know hates it.
Difference is that Neon Demon accomplished what it was trying. The prequels didn't succeed at expanding the universe or bridging the stories. At the end of the day, I ignore the prequels because they don't align with the OT, because they aren't exciting movies, and because they feel obtuse and horribly unsupervised.
He wanted to be killed off in Empire. That's why is acting was so bad in RotJ. He didn't want to be there.