AngelSoldier
Banned
IQ won't look that good.
What is this "IQ" everybody keeps talking about ?
IQ won't look that good.
What is this "IQ" everybody keeps talking about ?
Running real time on today's hardware.
It's short for image quality.
What is this "IQ" everybody keeps talking about ?
Image Quality.
I don't know if the title is supposed to be a trick question. Would I be happy if next gen games looked like high quality FMV that no system can run in real time?
S.. Sure?
Running real time on today's hardware.
Low tier? Now you're just posting lies.[Clark Gable];34552397 said:Nah, SE fmvs? Low tier, now if it were Blizzards CG, than that would be something else.
Image Quality.
I don't know if the title is supposed to be a trick question. Would I be happy if next gen games looked like high quality FMV that no system can run in real time?
S.. Sure?
They really aren't. I've been disappointed in the Square FMV I've seen recently. Not up to what I expect after seeing the kind of stuff done by Blizzard.Good for it. Square's FMV's are still better.
They really aren't. I've been disappointed in the Square FMV I've seen recently. Not up to what I expect after seeing the kind of stuff done by Blizzard.
Er, what? The FFXIII CG kicks the best looking console games up and down the street.No. Not really. To me that doesn't look significantly better than what is available now IMO. I wouldn't be happy paying significantly more and covering development costs for software that only look slightly better. I would like a XBox to X360 generational jump preferably. If you can't visually surpass this generation, why even push the next generation consoles out then?
They really aren't. I've been disappointed in the Square FMV I've seen recently. Not up to what I expect after seeing the kind of stuff done by Blizzard.
Let the East vs West bias showdown begin !
no, I don't want anything looking like Enix.
*shivers*
This thread makes me ponder whether anyone has actually played FF XIII. Sure it's not the greatest game, but the production values of their CGI scenes is incredibly good, to suggest that next gen graphics can even approach that level of graphical fidelity AND animation that Square churns out on a god damn render farm is pretty laughable. I mean the game had CGI scenes like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWJxXtjOjIo We aren't getting visuals like that.... ever.
And they have to make the FMV's somehow right ? Just take the computer's they use to make these FMV's and compact them into a console ! Taaa-daa !
... you know the point of the thread? The thread asking if you wished future hardware could run games that look like the FMV in real time.
I answer that question with a No in my past post.
I guess I should correct myself.
The FMV of FFXIII-2 do sometimes looks better than the Witcher 2 but yet again, only sometimes.
Already FFXIII running real time on the PS3 does look very similar to that FMV, and for a next gen system I want much more besides 1080p/60fps.
Would you be happy if "Next-Gen" games looked like this ? In Real time ? As in, these FMV scenes would be in-game actually happening as you play graphics.
I would. Square Enix makes beautiful FMV's and I would absolutely be pumped if next-gen Final Fantasy's were rendered in real time this beautifully.
I answer that question with a No in my past post.
I guess I should correct myself.
The FMV of FFXIII-2 do sometimes looks better than the Witcher 2 but yet again, only sometimes.
Already FFXIII running real time on the PS3 does look very similar to that FMV, and for a next gen system I want much more besides 1080p/60fps.
hahaha <3Looks like shit. Too many colors. Not enough blood. When will Nintendo stop their trend of low powered systems?
Doin it right?
that's no fair, most of the hawken guys were doing project offset, far from average.
Fair enough. Although I don't see thousands of moving people with AI.you mean like natural selection 2 and dear esther?
I answer that question with a No in my past post.
I guess I should correct myself.
The FMV of FFXIII-2 do sometimes looks better than the Witcher 2 but yet again, only sometimes.
Already FFXIII running real time on the PS3 does look very similar to that FMV, and for a next gen system I want much more besides 1080p/60fps.
IF any game came out like this today, i would give it zero out of ten for graphics.How about if this is what GTA6 looks like?
IF any game came out like this today, i would give it zero out of ten for graphics.
Those are some of the worst textures ive ever seen.
This is 2012, Normal maps, Parallax Oc and Displacement maps should be standard...every game without them should be banned immediately.
More on topic, am I the only one who doesnt really like the look of Squares FMVs?
Poly count is only half the fight.
They dont really do anything for me
I was thinking the Diablo III intro actually. Just watched some XIII CG to refresh my memory, and it's definitely better than what any game does in real time at the moment, but a good portion of that is down to the fluid animation and camera cuts, which is much harder to do in real time. The characters don't look especially detailed to me, and the effects aren't that much better than what Hard Reset does in real time.Unless the last WoW expansion had some great cg intro, nothing in Starcract 2 looked as good as XIII's cg.
Edit-That's just wrong. They looked about equall. But I don't think Sqaure is low tier, what bullshit.
If you compare model to model, they will of course look really close, the last of us's footage already look really good, it's like comparing Silent Hill 2's models to dragon age 2, SH2 still look a generation ahead of DA2.
If you watch the 1080p cutscenes with bigger scale, we're still far off off from ffxiii's cgi, for example cutscenes involved gran pulse and the action scene of them returning to cocoon.
Zelda Wii U gifs are like the Nintendo fan's Killzone gifs.
It would be nice, but am I supposed to believe that Japanese developers who choked developing on PS3 level hardware could do that in real time next generation?
Impressive is relative. KZ2 was impressive for a console from 2006 sure. Zelda is more of an omen.And both are graphically impressive, so I can see why they would take pride in them.