|
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
07:57 AM)
|
Could this be the first real PS4 info? (pc.watch.impress.co.jp)
#1
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2.../kaigai469.htm
Originally Posted by Deadm***:
This actually sounds real, unlike everything else I've read. Disappointing, but realistic, given PS3's position after nearly 2 years on the market, and Wii's absolutely massive success. |
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:02 AM)
|
#7
That would be quite interesting, and probably wise. No more $600 consoles at launch for Sony in the distant future, I'm sure.
Assuming it's true, I wonder if Microsoft will be following suit and offering a similar jump in power for their next Xbox. Which I wouldn't mind, personally. If the Wii can still impress me from time to time, I see nothing wrong with the HD consoles only going for a minor power upgrade in the next generation. |
|
(09-30-2008,
08:05 AM)
|
#10
If this is true, oops.
|
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:06 AM)
|
#12
$299
....With.... improved (but not next-gen) CELL architecture, higher clockspeeds, new Nvidia GPU (which could be the real improvement that is needed over PS3's RSX), more RAM. It could be like a really powerful PS3. The CPU power might only go up by 2x, but the GPU power could be a bigger leap. Even a current GTX 280 or 4870 would offer more than 2x more graphical muscle than RSX. Imagine what Nvidia could have completed by 2010 for a 2011 launch, and even something *less* than 100% state of the art bleeding edge for the time, as RSX was in 2006. |
|
(09-30-2008,
08:10 AM)
|
#16
Crytek would like to know too
|
|
(09-30-2008,
08:11 AM)
|
#18
Sony admitting defeat? Lolz
|
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:11 AM)
|
#19
Originally Posted by Daante:
It`s not like the consumer is choosing, and the ps3 even is behind the 360... o it`s all because of the wii - if the wii didn`t exist the whole casual ps2 fanbase would have bought those 400-600 machines at launch.... it`s all nintends fault.... *cry* |
|
(09-30-2008,
08:19 AM)
|
#28
If it runs everything at 60fps and 1080p with reduced loading times and power consumption I'll be happy enough.
|
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:21 AM)
|
#30
Originally Posted by cw_sasuke:
Iv said it before and i can say it again. I give Nintendo much credit and respect for what they done with the Wii and how they expand the market. However maby im the type of consumer that dont like to "waggle" around with my controller in every game i buy and want to play. Yes the option to control a game in that way and if the game really works best with controlling it that way suits me well sometimes, as in Super Mario Galaxy for example. But yeah next gen might be all about running and jumping around in your livingroom just to control and play a simple game, that would be so nice yeah..? Last edited by Daante : 09-30-2008 at 08:24 AM. |
|
Banned
(09-30-2008,
08:22 AM)
|
#31
If this is true (same Cell generation) then it's the GPU that will probably be the most advanced component at the time of release.
Now, what about that GamesIndustry.biz break-a-part controller rumor? (I mean, those guys were so certain of their source that they directly asked Kaz about it) 'Prototype' releasing in 09 as a warm up? Anyways, if PS4 or whatever can run 1080p relatively easily with texture resolution that will stand up to that image quality then I'm pleased, no less though. Take full advantage of the new standard. Phil stated reason for quitting was due to Sony starting to ramp up research for next-generation and he had been involved with enough shifts. |
|
(09-30-2008,
08:22 AM)
|
#32
Originally Posted by Troidal:
|
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:23 AM)
|
#34
Originally Posted by Daante:
This isn`t even the case with most of the wii games i own - i don`t know what ur talkin about... if u really think u have zo waggle around just like those kids in wii ads than it`s your fault, not nintendos... |
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:24 AM)
|
#37
http://www.gamecyte.com/ps4-based-on...cell-processor
Quote:
|
|
(09-30-2008,
08:24 AM)
|
#38
Originally Posted by sullytao:
There won't be the resolution difference we've seen this gen which makes the Wii look so bad in comparison to 360/PS3 - especially on LCD TVs. Although I'm sure some were hoping for 1080p as a defacto standard for games, but even then at least the consoles upscale and some games support it natively already this gen. |
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:29 AM)
|
#39
Originally Posted by cw_sasuke:
Thats not the case with most wii games i own either. But if you think about it , the next step for Nintendo after being this successful with the Wii control scheme, Wii fit and everything else , witch direction do you think they will take once the next gen consoles are here? |
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:29 AM)
|
#40
Am I getting old or what...
I STILL don't have any next gen systems... 360/PS3/Wii/PSP/for fucks sake no DS yet... and they're talking about next NEXT gen? should I just wait it out and stick to PC this gen or what? Damnit, I was so hardcore back in the day... Fuck being poor, I can't afford this $500 system plus HDTV bullshit... |
|
Considers fanny-packs to be the utmost in haute fashion. :x
(09-30-2008,
08:30 AM)
|
#41
Don't see the issue much, as some folks have said. The GC-Wii transition was pretty apparent vs the current guys. But with won't be anywhere near as bad. PS3 itself is a pretty amazing piece of work as it is, and it hasn't been even fully tapped yet. I'd wager and say it'd still hold it's own.
|
|
Banned
(09-30-2008,
08:30 AM)
|
#42
I honestly see no reason why Sony would launch the PS4 early, especially if it's only marginally more powerful than the PS3.
Sony's biggest issue all along was getting the price down to reasonable levels. And while they've made strides to improve the situation, it is still nowhere near where they need to be for mainstream consumers. What advantage would releasin the PS4 early have, outside of creating yet another hardware cycle to support, splintering the current Playstation userbase, and ushering in only marginal performance results? Just stick with the PS3, get the prices down, get even more great games out, and then release a significantly more powerful PS4 in 2013/2014. And frankly, given how Sony has reiterated the 10 year plan, reports lik this sound like nonsense to me. |
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:31 AM)
|
#46
What I was hoping for, for the then-still-in-development PS3, back in 2003
http://web.archive.org/web/200312082...ss/5311288.htm
Quote:
That would've been like 8 CELL processors on 1 chip (8 PPEs + 64 SPEs) even though the terms 'PPE' and 'SPE' were not used at the time, they were known as 'PU' and 'APU' respectively. Anyway then when that didn't happen, I thought, okay, maybe that'll be PS4. Oh well. |
|
hyperbolically metafictive
(09-30-2008,
08:32 AM)
|
#47
so...the actual information is just that sony is exploring the possibility of
a. reusing the cell architecture in some form and b. using JEDEC memory, whatever that is exactly and everything about the low performance target is speculation. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOUR SOURCE IS DEADMEAT |
|
Member
(09-30-2008,
08:34 AM)
|
#49
Originally Posted by drohne:
Yet Deadmeat isnt really the source, it's pc.watch.impress.co.jp, and this has now been picked up by at least one western website (probably more now, if not soon). Forget DM and pay attention to credible sites. |