• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Watch_Dogs Torrent secretly installing a Bitcoin miner on thousands of computers

iMax

Member
Why is what Ubisoft thinks about this relevant? That's what I mean by "small potatoes". They're a huge ass corp. They probably don't give a shit about some dude on the internet mining doge coins.

Oh, I see what you mean. I thought you were implying it was less of a legal issue because of how big they are.
 
Then there's people like this who are desperately looking for more people to use bitcoins for whatever reason. The idea is that the more people who get into them, the more the value goes up so the early adopters who got in while they were cheap will be richer.

As I said, for normal people Bitcoins provide no use whatsoever that regular money does not already grant you. You are only giving up your consumer rights (bitcoins have no chargebacks).

Lol, I don't care that much. I just hate to see FUD being spread, so I try to put a stop to it when I can. I happen to know a thing or two about bitcoin, so I try to help others understand it when I can.

Anyway, I could sit here debating you, but like I said, I don't care that much.

Well that explained everything. Thanks!

No problem. I updated my post with another video that helps clarify some stuff, and more importantly can explain why this technology is so important.

There really isn't very much reason to obsess over the technology unless you're the type of dude who would've gotten excited about TCP/IP back in the day. Bitcoin is still in beta.
 
Lol, I don't care that much. I just hate to see FUD being spread, so I try to put a stop to it when I can. I happen to know a thing or two about bitcoin, so I try to help others understand it when I can.

The video you posted is full of nothing but positive encouragement which is a bad thing when talking about bitcoins. For example, the part where it says that many exchanges are set up where you can trade bitcoins for real currencies. It doesn't mention that the biggest exchange stole everyone's money this year. You are trusting random people that coded an exchange system, and because bitcoins are not regulated in any way the police won't care if your shit gets stolen. When you go into bitcoins, you go outside the law where only the libertarian "fuck you, got mine" ideology applies.
 
Can't/Won't, same thing. They won't be able to maintain the margins their shareholders expect so they won't even initiate the projects in the first place. The only reason software is ludicrously expensive is because of piracy.
The only reason? REALLY?
 
I'm not a PC gamer anymore so I wouldn't know. But if that's the case, that's an active example of publishers blocking piracy because it affects their bottom line.
No, Ubisoft used the cracked game instead of their own and I was not sure if that version worked online since it was a crack.
 

Fularu

Banned
Since SkidRow would never do that, my guess is on a repacker who modified SR's installer.

Prety funny in the end.
 
Yep, I must have single-handedly motivated every person in here to post about piracy. More asinine drive-by thread shitting and it figures you would quote the person who literally took a shit, contributed nothing and left.

No you didn't single handedly do anything but your stance on piracy doesn't help.

Of course you're free to hold any stance you want I just think it sucks.
 

Marcel

Member
No you didn't single handedly do anything but your stance on piracy doesn't help.

Of course you're free to hold any stance you want I just think it sucks.

I think there is not enough non-contentious data to support claims about piracy's actual affect on AAA publishers and the faux-sanctimonious "I would never pirate X game but maybe ROMs and stuff", "Piracy is the sole reason games are expensive" shit makes my eyes roll so much I almost fall out of my chair.
 

iMax

Member
I think there is not enough non-contentious data to support claims about piracy's actual affect on AAA publishers and the faux-sanctimonious "I would never pirate X game but maybe ROMs and stuff", "Piracy is the sole reason games are expensive" shit makes my eyes roll so much I almost fall out of my chair.

Is there enough evidence to support the counterclaim?
 
The video you posted is full of nothing but positive encouragement which is a bad thing when talking about bitcoins. For example, the part where it says that many exchanges are set up where you can trade bitcoins for real currencies. It doesn't mention that the biggest exchange stole everyone's money this year. You are trusting random people that coded an exchange system, and because bitcoins are not regulated in any way the police won't care if your shit gets stolen. When you go into bitcoins, you go outside the law where only the libertarian "fuck you, got mine" ideology applies.

Here's a followup video.

If you're willing to put in the work, then you can figure out on your own that all of your concerns have already been addressed. I won't spoonfeed you the information because, like I said, it's in beta, and you don't really need to worry about it yet.
 

Marcel

Member
Is there enough evidence to support the counterclaim?

If piracy has that much of an affect on the AAA game industry as they claim then the burden of proof is on them. Me being skeptical of what rich old men in a boardroom say affects their pocketbook does not require evidence.
 
People are actually defending pirates here. I guess some people don't care about stealing a companies property if it doesn't impact them. Do any pirate defenders happen to own a store with products I can acquire free of charge?
 

Symax

Member
Because a news item related to piracy will prompt discussions over piracy? How is it difficult to understand?

I don't get the feeling that you are interested in a constructive discussion. You are just defending your ideologies.
 

Marcel

Member
People are actually defending pirates here. I guess some people don't care about stealing a companies property if it doesn't impact them. Do any pirate defenders happen to own a store with products I can acquire free of charge?

How are the physical contents of a store connected with pirating, other than the time-wasting "it's the same morally" thing we've addressed like three times? If you have something that proves that piracy = same thing as a stolen good from a store, feel free to show it.

Here's something I'll show, from the article posted by Vigilant Gambit:

Also - Piracy is not "stealing," for the record.

Piracy is the unauthorized access and duplication of copyrighted material, such as a movie or video game.

Stealing is the unauthorized taking of some thing, such as money, horses, or sandwiches, which deprives the rightful owner of said stolen thing.

When you pirate Defender's Quest, you are violating my legal right to monopolize its distribution for a limited period* of time. You are not, however, "stealing" it, because I still have my copies of it, and so do all the other customers who bought it. Piracy and stealing are two different things.
 
I think this is hilarious as well as meta.

Don't understand people who spend thousands on computers and then steal games to play on them.

Just buy the game if you want to play it. It looks amazing.
 
A friend of mine downloaded a different torrent and has reported no problems. I'm not that interested myself--apparently you gotta have Uplay running to get it to work, and after Uplay screwed up Assassin's Creed IV for me, I'd hate to do something that could in any way jeopardize my saves. Besides, like, dat stuff's not exactly legal.

REALLY curious about the performance issues people are mentioning. If I run my litecoin mining stuff, it harms my performance in a big way. Surely they'd notice a deterioration in gaming performance as well?

Uplay will overwrite your saves anyway. I remember it was a big headache to get my splinter cell saves back.
 

Ponn

Banned
How are the physical contents of a store connected with pirating, other than the time-wasting "it's the same morally" thing we've addressed like three times? If you have something that proves that piracy = same thing as a stolen good from a store, feel free to show it.

Here's something I'll show, from the article posted by Vigilant Gambit:

Semantics, making people feel better about the bad shit they do since humanity began.
 
Oh god, I feel zero sympathy for the pirates either (I have NEVER pirated anything in my life, and I'm proud of that) and they are all terrible people, but him making money from this is pretty bad.

Hitler-Tash-Michael-Jordan.jpg
 

Xilium

Member
It's always interesting to read through threads like this and see so many people fundamentally against piracy and then to turn around and see the exact opposite behavior in just about any porn related thread.

From what I've seen in this forum and others (as well as IRL), if a person is an enthusiast consumer of a particular medium, they tend to very anti-piracy of that particular medium (as they tend to care more about the creators of those products) but if it's a medium that they are only a casual consumer of, they tend to have a much more laissez-faire approach to piracy. Porn seems to go yet another step further though as many people seem to be proud about the fact that they pirate it and have a disdain for the people that create it (despite being a regular consumer of their works).
 

theJohann

Member
Semantics, making people feel better about the bad shit they do since humanity began.

I don't see why the only possible approach that one can take against piracy is to equate it with stealing, when there are arguably enough nuances to separate the two while still maintaining that they are both odious acts. You do not need to say, "it's wrong because it's stealing" which will demonstrably result in an argument over semantics, when you can alternatively say "it's wrong because it's as immoral as stealing" and have much more compelling points to argue with at your disposal, and a much more fruitful discussion.

Furthermore, saying "it's morally wrong because it's illegal" is really quite ridiculous to me. The law can absolutely be wrong, as history has demonstrated, and it being fallible is the premise of any moral debate to begin with; discussions of morality consist of prescriptive/normative arguments by nature, whereas the statement "it's illegal!" is descriptive.
 

Scrooged

Totally wronger about Nintendo's business decisions.
Pirates who defend what they do because it's not 'stealing' a physical object are the fucking worst. Just admit what you're doing is scummy and immoral. Don't try to get on any high ground.
 

SephiZack

Member
This news got me to think. Wouldn't it be possible to have Mine2Play games?

I think it would be a good idea. The publisher gives you the game for free with an auto-mining app. You don't have to pay the game and the publisher can gain money
 

iNvid02

Member
It's been interesting to see this guy's feeble attempts to justify it throughout this thread, after removing the word shit from every other sentence we can conclude the following:

1. piracy is a victimless crime. you think otherwise? lol
2. anyone opposing this is surely feigning
3. i dont like the RRP, it must be artificially inflated
4. why won't they the lower the RRP, they'd still make bank on consoles
5. its all good, it is AAA after all. they take it into consideration
6. scratch that, anyone opposing is now surely a corporate apologist
7. there are worse things happening in the world right now, leave us be
8. they already make too much money, its time for others to get a piece of the action

and you have the audacity to claim people are talking shit? you're free to do as you please, just don't try to sugarcoat it in public so you can feel better about yourself. cunt.
 
It's not exactly a secret when one (or more) core(s) of your CPU is being pegged at 100% usage all the time when you're idling on the desktop.

Very easy to pick up in the Task manager, and for those with dual cores, you'll notice the overall system sluggishness immediately when attempting to run any half intensive app of your own.

Legit groups and releases don't do this, btw. To use the scene "terminology", they'd be "nuked" if they put shiet like that into their releases, possibly blacklisted by the rest of the groups, who're always in competition.
 

iMax

Member
It's been interesting to see this guy's feeble attempts to justify it throughout this thread, after removing the word shit from every other sentence we can conclude the following:

1. piracy is a victimless crime. you think otherwise? lol
2. anyone opposing this is surely feigning
3. i dont like the RRP, it must be artificially inflated
4. why won't they the lower the RRP, they'd still make bank on consoles
5. its all good, it is AAA after all. they take it into consideration
6. scratch that, anyone opposing is now surely a corporate apologist
7. there are worse things happening in the world right now, leave us be
8. they already make too much money, its time for others to get a piece of the action

and you have the audacity to claim people are talking shit? you're free to do as you please, just don't try to sugarcoat it in public so you can feel better about yourself. cunt.

Honestly, I'm kinda bemused by the position that corporations 'deserve' to be pirated because they can absorb the revenue loss.
 
Top Bottom