If Nintendo was going to do a lazy port (because that's what this is), they should have done Skyward Sword.
I don't understand why people think Wind Waker was any different - it was just as lazy, but cel shaded game tend to hold up better.
I hope not many people are going to buy this thing at full price. We have to send the message that these types of cash grabs aren't ok.
...That's exactly the point of a remake, to get rid of the limitations of the original graphics. OoT and MM3D redid the character models and generally made the entire game higher poly, added in entirely new lighting, and created dramatically improved textures and completely new assets from scratch. They're still not exactly cutting edge games, but they look much more modern than an N64 game thanks to those improvements.
WWHD didn't have as much work put in, but they still overhauled the lighting system by adding in new effects like bloom and ambient occlusion and generally polished the game up to look great by modern standards.
TPHD hasn't done any of that stuff. It's just the same game in HD with a nice but underwhelming texture upgrade. Nintendo could have eliminated these problems by going back to the original concept are and recreating the main character models with more polygons like they did for OoT3D and MM3D. They could have overhauled that archaic castle scene with newly made assets and effects- look at how differently Hyrule castle town turned out in OoT3D vs the original. Here, it's pretty much no different than the original.
If they weren't willing to put the work into overhauling the visuals to a modern standard, they shouldn't have bothered. The game is honestly not the most interesting Zelda title and it really needed something special to make it exciting to play again. You may disagree, but as a huge fan who bought all the other remakes on day one I have next to no interest in this.
If Nintendo was going to do a lazy port (because that's what this is), they should have done Skyward Sword.
then...what is it?Yea no... stop pulling this nonsense out of your butts.
then...what is it?
TPHD is not a remake, it was never supposed to be a remake, it will never be a remake. It's a HD remaster.
A lot of crazy expectations around here, really.
then...what is it?
She looked less bizarre in the screenshot they tweeted.
Oot and mm were remake not remasters dude and Ww always looked better then TP.
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that came before it?
Still have the Wii version so I'm good.
I think ill buy Pokken instead LOL
Still have the Wii version so I'm good.
I think ill buy Pokken instead LOL
Oot and mm were remake not remasters dude and Ww always looked better then TP.
I feel the same way about my GC version. The $80 CAD price tag isn't exactly helping things for the HD ver.
Have they announced any substantial changes yet? Like along the lines of the swift sail in Wind Waker HD?
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that came before it?
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that immediately preceded it?
You say that it's just a "remaster" and not a remake, as if that justifies the fact that Nintendo is giving us a minimal effort. That's the problem- they're giving us a remaster when the game needed a remake.
I feel the same way about my GC version. The $80 CAD price tag isn't exactly helping things for the HD ver.
Have they announced any substantial changes yet? Like along the lines of the swift sail in Wind Waker HD?
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that immediately preceded it?
You say that it's just a "remaster" and not a remake, as if that justifies the fact that Nintendo is giving us a minimal effort. That's the problem- they're giving us a remaster when the game needed a remake.
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that immediately preceded it?
You say that it's just a "remaster" and not a remake, as if that justifies the fact that Nintendo is giving us a minimal effort. That's the problem- they're giving us a remaster when the game needed a remake.
OOT3D doesn't look that good either TBH. But yeah, this game is not a remake. We've known that since the initial reveal. I'm not really sure why people are still getting upset about it.Oot and mm were remake not remasters dude and Ww always looked better then TP.
I feel the same way about my GC version. The $80 CAD price tag isn't exactly helping things for the HD ver.
Have they announced any substantial changes yet? Like along the lines of the swift sail in Wind Waker HD?
That comparison there shows they redid the textures but didn't bake any Ambient Occlusion to them. Since everything in there seems changed. I think their textures might look better but without the baked AO and no real time shading system going on everything is going to look flat.
OOT3D doesn't look that good either TBH. But yeah, this game is not a remake. We've known that since the initial reveal. I'm not really sure why people are still getting upset about it.
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that immediately preceded it?
You say that it's just a "remaster" and not a remake, as if that justifies the fact that Nintendo is giving us a minimal effort. That's the problem- they're giving us a remaster when the game needed a remake.
I thought the strong lighting really added new life to Wind Waker's visuals. Being on these small islands surrounded by sea and having the sun gleaming down on you just felt good, it's absolutely beautiful when you're sailing along and see all the different shades of blue from the sea and sky that occur thanks to the new lighting.Because WW wasn't a 'remake' either, and they completely revamped the lighting in a game that didn't even really need that. Now, they are ignoring the game that does.
Because WW wasn't a 'remake' either, and they completely revamped the lighting in a game that didn't even really need that. Now, they are ignoring the game that does.
YoooooooYou people need to focus on the real news, which is how badass this official art of Ganondorf is:
Goddamn.
Because WWHD wasn't a 'remake' either, and they completely revamped the lighting even though it didn't really even need it. Now, they are ignoring the game that does.
Look at her shoulders. AO is still there, it's just a bit differently applied. And not as dark.
I thought the strong lighting really added new life to Wind Waker's visuals. Being on these small islands surrounded by sea and having the sun gleaming down on you just felt good, it's absolutely beautiful when you're sailing along and see all the different shades of blue from the sea and sky that occur thanks to the new lighting.
Damn loooks like wiimotion support won't be making it.. They'd be showing it by now. Just once I'd like to see left handed link using wiimote, but then perhaps that would be too much effort?
Oh well gamepad with gyroscope is a nice thing to meet in the middle.
You people need to focus on the real news, which is how badass this official art of Ganondorf is:
Goddamn.
I fully agree, I think it looks amazing. I'm saying, the game would have looked fine if they just gave it a run of the mill HD treatment. They went beyond that with WWHD, and I'm disappointed that TP isn't getting that same treatment. The work they have done looks nice, but not having that new lighting is really hurting the visuals.
It's crazy to expect TPHD to look half as good as the three stunning remasters that immediately preceded it?
You say that it's just a "remaster" and not a remake, as if that justifies the fact that Nintendo is giving us a minimal effort. That's the problem- they're giving us a remaster when the game needed a remake.
<_< >_>Wish that was a real in-game conversation.
#teammelia
Never noticed how chubby TP Ganon was.You people need to focus on the real news, which is how badass this official art of Ganondorf is:
Goddamn.
Is this going to be the worst selling Nintendo published zelda game?