• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT4| The leaks are coming from inside the white house

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pixieking

Banned
Heller and Paul vote no. Pence breaks tie.

Would he, though? It would kill absolutely any chance of a future presidential bid, and whilst he's absolutely tainted by Trump, he can still maybe-kinda-possibly turn on him. But, with being the tie-breaker in an AHCA vote, he has no chance of even being the nominee for President.
 

Plumbob

Member
Would he, though? It would kill absolutely any chance of a future presidential bid, and whilst he's absolutely tainted by Trump, he can still maybe-kinda-possibly turn on him. But, with being the tie-breaker in an AHCA vote, he has no chance of even being the nominee for President.

Just because it's a bad idea doesn't mean he wouldn't do it.
 

Maledict

Member
Would he, though? It would kill absolutely any chance of a future presidential bid, and whilst he's absolutely tainted by Trump, he can still maybe-kinda-possibly turn on him. But, with being the tie-breaker in an AHCA vote, he has no chance of even being the nominee for President.

Republicans don't care about the pain they inflict on themselves. It will be worth it to kill the inholy slavery that is Obamacare.

Pence breaking the senate tie to pass AHCA will be a big plus for him when it comes to republican voters. No matter how shit it goes. It will definitely massively help him in the primaries, and increase his odds of being the nominee.
 

Pixieking

Banned
You think? If the AHCA does end-up killing/hurting as many as everyone thinks it will, Republican voters are going to feel just as much pain - if not more - as everyone else. I can't imagine they'd look kindly on the guy who did that (which is what Pence would be, if he's the tiebreaker). Forget Ryan or McConnell being the architects - Pence would own AHCA more than anyone else.
 
Would he, though? It would kill absolutely any chance of a future presidential bid, and whilst he's absolutely tainted by Trump, he can still maybe-kinda-possibly turn on him. But, with being the tie-breaker in an AHCA vote, he has no chance of even being the nominee for President.

Yes, he would. Easily.
 
Would he, though? It would kill absolutely any chance of a future presidential bid, and whilst he's absolutely tainted by Trump, he can still maybe-kinda-possibly turn on him. But, with being the tie-breaker in an AHCA vote, he has no chance of even being the nominee for President.
The only reason this bill came back after dying once was because of Pence.

There's not a chance he doesn't vote for it
 

Pixieking

Banned
Fair fair.

Economic news... Specifically, that part of the economy which Trump will ignore even as it drags him down - retail:

Sears says it will close 20 more stores

More bad news for Sears Holdings: The beleaguered chain on Friday said it will shutter an additional 20 U.S. stores, amounting to more than 260 closures so far this year.

Analysts, including those from credit ratings agency Moody's, have been sounding the alarm that Sears Holdings may be headed for bankruptcy, joining more than 300 U.S. retailers this year.

Obviously more at the link, but things aren't looking good. If the new Sears Appliances & Mattresses store doesn't get customers in, they're going to go under, and with how the hedge-fund management and leasing company is arranged, it's not going to be good for everyday retail workers.
 
It's also going to accelerate the death of malls

Sears is a token anchor stores. One of the malls I go to, it's practically considered the front entrance. At another mall, it's literally the only anchor store still open. That's quite a loss of steady rent from basically every mall in the country

Also my water heater warranty isn't up for another year and a half :/
 

Diablos

Member
If you think about Sears, they've been in trouble since the 90s. It's amazing to me that the store in any capacity is able to stay open. They never really bounced back and if they haven't by now they never will
 

FyreWulff

Member
If you think about Sears, they've been in trouble since the 90s. It's amazing to me that the store in any capacity is able to stay open. They never really bounced back and if they haven't by now they never will

They had a chance, unfortunately they're run by a guy literally using them as a hedge fund, he's intentionally doomed them from the moment he got in
 

Kevinroc

Member
Trump's core voters could suffer most under GOP health bill, but they may not punish him for it

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/23/trum...if-unpopular-gop-health-care-bill-passes.html

TL:DR version

A study says Trump's victory was propelled more by racial solidarity than his views on trade or entitlements.

Trump's core voters are more likely to rely on Medicaid, which faces cuts under the GOP health-care bill, but experts expect them to stay loyal to Trump.

Republican lawmakers, however, have a different relationship with those voters, who have an emotional connection to Trump.
 
Trump's core voters could suffer most under GOP health bill, but they may not punish him for it

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/23/trum...if-unpopular-gop-health-care-bill-passes.html

TL:DR version

Frankly, these studies are all kind of useless until something actually happens. It's super easy to say "oh sure he can take my healthcare away and it'll be worth it and I'll still love him" and another to say something similar after you've, I dunno, been forced to sell your house to make payments on your chemotherapy treatments.
 
Frankly, these studies are all kind of useless until something actually happens. It's super easy to say "oh sure he can take my healthcare away and it'll be worth it and I'll still love him" and another to say something similar after you've, I dunno, been forced to sell your house to make payments on your chemotherapy treatments.

Republican economic policies are also devastating to conservative voters and they dont seem to mind, but i hope you're right.
 

Diablos

Member

dramatis

Member
NPR's education news of the week has a small section on

DeVos Appoints CEO Of A Student Loan Company To Head Federal Aid Agency
Wayne A. Johnson will be the new head of Federal Student Aid after James Runcie abruptly resigned last month, the U.S. Department of Education announced this week. FSA is the agency responsible for administering $1.4 trillion in outstanding student loans from 42 million borrowers, plus other aid programs for millions of college students.

As not mentioned in the department's press release, and first reported by Buzzfeed, Johnson is currently the CEO of Reunion Financial Services Corporation, a private student loan company.
 

Diablos

Member
Would he, though? It would kill absolutely any chance of a future presidential bid, and whilst he's absolutely tainted by Trump, he can still maybe-kinda-possibly turn on him. But, with being the tie-breaker in an AHCA vote, he has no chance of even being the nominee for President.
Of course he would vote for it. His PAC went after Dean Heller as soon as he announced his opposition to the bill. What does that tell you??
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Yeah this isn't a contest.

ed: What's funny about Sears is that in a lot of ways they were originally the Amazon of the 20th century. You could get nearly anything in the Sears-Roebuck catalogue, up to and including houses!

Just goes to show, time marches on.

They missed out and got left behind, like Blockbuster. Their death is 100% on their management not making the moves they should have made.
 

Diablos

Member
They missed out and got left behind, like Blockbuster. Their death is 100% on their management not making the moves they should have made.
They wasted so much time and potential doing stupid things like Sears Grand. They've been wandering around aimlessly for like three decades now. It's time to go, for good.
 
The man who owned my house before the previous owner had his mortgage through Sears.

Found it out while the lawyer was checking the history of the property. I remember asking him if that was the same as the department store, and he just laughed and said Sears was doing some crazy stuff in the 70s and 80s
 
DDFn2OwUwAA2UOo.jpg:large


Not a good strategy
 

dramatis

Member
Supposedly Zuckerberg was doing the nationwide tour not because he was aspiring to politics but because he's changing Facebook up.

So I guess we can breathe a sigh of relief?
 

Diablos

Member
Supposedly Zuckerberg was doing the nationwide tour not because he was aspiring to politics but because he's changing Facebook up.

So I guess we can breathe a sigh of relief?
It's too early to know what he's really going to do. He may not even be sure yet.
 

kess

Member
They had a chance, unfortunately they're run by a guy literally using them as a hedge fund, he's intentionally doomed them from the moment he got in

One of the worst things about Eddie Lampert is how he trashed Craftsmen and Kenmore, equitable brands that once made high quality items.

A cash rich but badly run K-Mart could have bought Amazon a hundred times over when that deal went down.
 
Supposedly Zuckerberg was doing the nationwide tour not because he was aspiring to politics but because he's changing Facebook up.

So I guess we can breathe a sigh of relief?

I think it doesn't matter. Dude would be DOA if he runs in the Democratic primaries. He's going to be pinned to Facebook's apathy towards the rise and spread of fake news. I'm not against a technocratic leader running, just not him.
 

dramatis

Member
Some U.S. States Relax Restrictions On Cladding Suspected In Grenfell Tower Fire
The type of siding or "cladding" used on the Grenfell Tower in London — and suspected in the massive fire that killed dozens of residents — is not allowed on the exterior of tall buildings across most of the U.S.

But a few states and the District of Colombia have relaxed building codes in recent years and started to permit its use.
In the United States most jurisdictions don't allow this type of cladding for buildings over 40 feet. That's because they've adopted the International Building Code (IBC), which requires cladding for tall buildings to pass a rigorous test developed by the National Fire Protection Association called "NFPA 285". The purpose of the test is to ensure that installed cladding will be non-combustible.

In recent years, a few U.S. jurisdictions have eliminated this testing requirement. They now permit cladding similar to what was believed to be on the Grenfell Tower, as long as the building has other fire safety measures in place, such as a working sprinkler system. (The Greenfell Tower reportedly did not have sprinklers).

This softening of some U.S. building codes upsets Tulsa-based fire protection engineer John Valiulis. He says D.C. and three states — Minnesota, Indiana and Massachusetts — have exempted cladding from NFPA 285 testing.
 
That's a really weird combo of locations.

My first thought too. Firgued it'd be all red states, but no, there's DC, Massachusetts and Minnesota.

(Title is slightly misleading btw. Kind of implies that they relaxed it in reaction to Grenfall which clearly isn't the case).
 
Kyle Griffin‏Verified account @kylegriffin1 9m9 minutes ago

Per pool, motorcade arrived at Trump Nat'l Golf Club in Sterling, VA.

This is Trump's 25th visit to a golf course as president.

Getting ridiculous
 

Roughly 10 years ago
Kennedy: "Hey guys, I can't agree with this case right now, but if you come back with a better lower court ruling, I might go along with it"
Lawyers: "k"
10 years later
Lawyers: "Hey, we got that case you wanted"
Kennedy: "Oh sweet, hey Roberts, can we hear this case? I really want to"
Roberts: "k"
2 weeks later
Kennedy: "jk I was retiring, cya losers"

There's more evidence he's not retiring this year than there is that he is. Retiring now would be really weird considering there are a few cases he specifically wanted to hear this year.

Actions speak louder than words
 
Kennedy and Trump's kids are on quite good terms. He is still a conservative and will want a Republican President to replace him.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/donald-trump-supreme-court-236925

That's cool

Still doesn't stop the fact that Kennedy literally took up cases this year for the Supreme Court

Why would he do that if he was not even planning on hearing them

I remember in April when Kennedy was sure, "according to aides close to him," to announce his retirement by early May. It's now almost July. The next SC calendar is being set up. Kennedy is actively participating in creating that calendar and picking out cases that he specifically wants to hear. And while he can technically announce his retirement next week, other than random rumors, there's nothing to indicate that at all, and plenty showing that it's just all rumors.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
Trump might want to use the nomination of a new judge as a bargaining tool against his own party over X bill(s).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom