• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Marvel's The Avengers |OT| (Dir. Joss Whedon) [Spoilers unmarked]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't see the problem with it. Mute the colors for the big screen adn it would look fine.

His movie armor is way too busy for my liking, especially the new suit at the end of the Avengers.

Each to their own. Like Technomancer, the form fitting thing really bugs me. If they never used that the majority of the models would look far better, personally.
 
Who's chasing it? Looks like some sort of mixture of War Machine and the Destroyer.



It aged really badly. I can't see movie Iron Man suffering like that.

Well, he's in the middle of a big storyline involving The Mandarin(probably his biggest villian) teaming up with Ezekiel Stane(Obadiah Stane's revenge-fueled son) and crooked government General Babbage are all working on slowly dismantling Tony Stark and his company. They're using old Stark tech to rebuild some D-list rogues(that's probably who's in the picture) they've recruited to distract him from their real plans, namely Tony Stark got drunk and they've leaked the info out to the press. People don't like relasping alcoholics being behind the wheel of multi-million dollar suits of destruction, so Tony's been forced out of being Iron Man for the time being. Who knows what happens next?
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
Movie Armor really is best armor.

But that's soon being replaced by MYSTERY IRON MAN. Who is the man behind the mask!?

InvincibleIronMan_518_Preview1.jpg
Need context/info nao.

EDIT: Beaten.
 
Each to their own. Like Technomancer, the form fitting thing really bugs me. If they never used that the majority of the models would look far better, personally.

I always liked that, since the armor was supposed to be really thin on the arms and legs (and hence able to fit in a suitcase).
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
I always liked that, since the armor was supposed to be really thin on the arms and legs (and hence able to fit in a suitcase).

I guess it depends on what the armor is, I don't know what it was meant to be when that design was first published. If its literally just a suit of armor then the form-fitting thing as a design advantage makes sense, but if its meant to be powered at all, like increasing his strength and such, then the lack of bulk just bothers me. Mechanics take up space
 
Well, he's in the middle of a big storyline involving The Mandarin(probably his biggest villian) teaming up with Ezekiel Stane(Obadiah Stane's revenge-fueled son) and crooked government General Babbage are all working on slowly dismantling Tony Stark and his company. They're using old Stark tech to rebuild some D-list rogues(that's probably who's in the picture) they've recruited to distract him from their real plans, namely Tony Stark got drunk and they've leaked the info out to the press. People don't like relasping alcoholics being behind the wheel of multi-million dollar suits of destruction, so Tony's been forced out of being Iron Man for the time being. Who knows what happens next?

In fact, don't read this text, these few comic panels kinda sum up Stark's current situation, including how he sucks at making breakfast

i7pe3FG6hJYUz.jpg
 

G-Fex

Member
The King of Games has finally seen this movie.


Truly this is the KING Of comic book movies.

I felt like a child when I saw my favorite super heroes on screen kicking ass.
 
Plus it comes out of his bones.
Explain!

Does Fox or somebody still own the Silver Surfer movie rights? Maybe there's a contractual loophole that links Chris Evans and SS.

Hoo boy, if Avengers 2 ends with an after-credits shot of the Surfer hauling ass towards Earth I will just lose my shit all over everybody near me.
 
Why is this "Marvel's Avengers" and not "Disney's Avengers?" Is Disney keeping the label separate for now? If so, why?

I think Disney's strategy so far is to keep the relation between the Disney brand and the Marvel brand on a solely corporate level. The Marvel brand works well enough without support from the Disney brand.

Also, the Avengers is a Marvel creation. Calling it "Disney's" is a bit off.
 

richiek

steals Justin Bieber DVDs
Why is this "Marvel's Avengers" and not "Disney's Avengers?" Is Disney keeping the label separate for now? If so, why?

It has to do with Disney signing the deal with Paramount to distribute the Avengers and future MCU films. Paramount is contractually obligated to have their name in the credits, even though it's Disney who's marketing and distributing the film.
 

johnsmith

remember me
Why is this "Marvel's Avengers" and not "Disney's Avengers?" Is Disney keeping the label separate for now? If so, why?

Branding. Disney's The Avengers would just seem really weird. They kept the Pixar name after they bought them, and that would have melded with the existing Disney canon a lot smoother than Marvel. Though eventually I can see them branding the movies as Disney Marvel like they do Disney Pixar.
 

IceCold

Member

That's not the Extremis armor, it's the Bleeding Edge armor.

http://marvel.wikia.com/Iron_Man_Armor_Model_37

Known weaponry includes repulsors, uni-beam, pulse bolts, and an energy blade. Defenses include deflectors. Other type of weapons and upgrades seems to be created by Stark's imagination, such as a boxing glove.

This entire armor is kept inside Tony's body until mentally commanded in which it manifests itself as the Iron Man Armor. The armor is made up of Nano-Machines that can now be commanded to turn into any type of structure upon Stark's skin. For example, the nano-machines can turn into clothes, other armors, or even different beings completely, by having the nano-machines change their properties into whatever Stark wants them to. It can also dissociate to transform into the Iron Man armor whenever Stark wishes. The armor and Stark's own transhuman body are powered by the high-yield arc reactor mounted in his chest. The high output of the arc reactor has greatly augmented Stark's intelligence and provided him superhuman-level multitasking and learning capabilities.

Unlike earlier armors, this new armor does not appear to rely on motors and servos for motion. Instead, the nano-machines create a second layer of artificial muscle over Stark's body, upon which additional structures are assembled. This also enables the armor to self-repair and be almost invulnerable as the armor is capable of transforming and healing itself, by having the constantly replicating nano-machines replace anything that is lost or used, as long as the power output from the arc reactor isn't interrupted or terminated.

dat comic book science.

FAt9o.jpg
 
Why is this "Marvel's Avengers" and not "Disney's Avengers?" Is Disney keeping the label separate for now? If so, why?

I was under the impression this was to keep the IP separate from the old UK "The Avengers" series (with emma peel, etc) that got a movie relaunch a decade or so back
 

LakeEarth

Member
Are there any pics of the Iridium rock from this movie, someone said it is in the shape of Serenity but it might just be another rumour.
 
dat comic book science.

Damn, that armor is badass. Really like the look of it too (also preferred movie IM armor to the comics, and this looks very much like the movie versions).

Anyway, saw this movie yesterday (my mom wanted to see it for Mother's Day, so my brother and I took her). Fucking amazing.
 

Cloudy

Banned
Saw this over the weekend. Totally amazing movie and the buildup in the other movies was totally worth it :)

RDJ as Iron Man is one of the best castings ever :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom