Seems way, way too optimistic.
next gen hasn't even started yet and he already talks about the end.
I'm confused why its the last gen yet sells more then the current gen..
I'm sure its been discussed already but if he is projecting such high sales for the ps4 and Durango then why is next gen gonna be the last gen?
The current gen still isn't over. PS3 is still over $200, it's very likely to end outselling the Wii. Still have some big games to come, price cuts, a lot of future great old content at a cheap price in PS+ (old PS2, PS3, PS1 games) which would be great for emerging markets, multiplatforms/ports with Vita and WiiU, etc.
Btw, is you remove the casuals from Wii then you also have to remove the casuals from PS2 who played Eyetoy, Singstar, Buzz, Guitar Hero, etc. I think it isn't fair.
He predicts moderate growth at the high end and then predicts that nobody will try again for another round. Weird.
True, but it's also true that Nintendo still have to release a lot of games for WiiU which would help it with both their fanbase and casuals. I agree his WiiU estimate despite of the low start.disgree here, because by all indications the gamers that were brought on for singstar, buzz, guitar hero etc. were retained by the ps3 and xbox 360. (there's been an increase between PS2 + xbox at this point, and ps3 + xbox at this point)
The casual audience targeted by the wii seems to have abandoned it entirely.
I think it's going to be an app to use it as remote control / tv guide, something that I think is going to be in PS4 and WiiU too.So are the TV tuner rumors for Xbox solid enough to assume it's in? It's a HUGE feature for me. I love the prospect of it.
That wouldn't stop Sony. Besides, just competing with Microsoft would be hard for Nintendo. MS has already shown they'll spend billions in this race.
Competing against Microsoft and Sony isn't exactly a walk in the park. Why would Nintendo going up against Microsoft alone be any harder than that? And yes, Microsoft has shown that they're willing to lose billions in this race. Guess what? At best, they were still second place in hardware sales.
your understanding is wrong. all of the consoles I listed still sold significant numbers after their replacements showed up. the neo is a special case there though.
the reasoning for this is because companies use the declining years to target the budget market that can't afford a console over $99, and overseas markets like Latin America.
the ps3 is still 269, and hasn't reached either of these groups yet. Sony recently also got permission to start selling in China, iirc. with a price reduction it will hit 100 million very easily.
Not really. Those numbers seem to be about as safe a prediction as possible.
Those numbers are bollocks. The console gaming market is shrinking. There is no way numbers will be higher next generation for any of the three.
mobile phones were going to destroy the handheld gaming market and it never happened
And yet this console generation has seen more consoles sold than any previous generation.Those numbers are bollocks. The console gaming market is shrinking. There is no way numbers will be higher next generation for any of the three.
Sure, against the PS2 and the Wii. Nintendo can't spend the same money as Microsoft nor can they be assured of Wii-like success (clearly, see the Wii U).
It's pure economics. Microsoft can throw money at the problem; Nintendo cannot.
When you say significant, what do you mean?
I understand how they do it but the PSone sold 28 million while the PS2 was out - that is significant.
What are the other numbers like?
Sure, against the PS2 and the Wii. Nintendo can't spend the same money as Microsoft nor can they be assured of Wii-like success (clearly, see the Wii U).
It's pure economics. Microsoft can throw money at the problem; Nintendo cannot.
Those numbers are bollocks. The console gaming market is shrinking. There is no way numbers will be higher next generation for any of the three.
You are vastly underestimating how much money Nintendo has.
PS2 sold more than 50m this gen.
Interesting, both machines got 20-30% of their total install base after their bigger brother came out. I anticipate Sony will ship a total of 95-100m PS3 units given that 20-30% of its sales will come after PS4 comes out.
His numbers are bullshit. Nintendo will probably end up in first or second place at the end of this next generation. It's also bullshit to assume the PS4/720 will have similar numbers, especially when we don't know the prices/negative features of said devices that may deter people from purchasing them (aka dealbreakers).
You didn't do the math. Patcher's numbers in that slide agree with you.
Thing is, I'm not saying the PS3 or 360 won't reach those 90 mil numbers (I feel they won't because I think they will want their first party studios and third party pubs to focus on their new consoles). I'm saying that if Patcher is saying the next generation will reach 90 million sold, then that means that according to my opinion, they will have exceeded sales from this generation. Now, if the 360/PS3 do reach 90 million I believe it will come at the cost of PS4/Durango sales if both launch this holiday. The current market cannot sustain 5 consoles selling exceptionally well. So if the PS4 launches this holiday and the PS3 is still selling on track to reach 90 million, that means the PS4 is ultimate bomba extraordinaire meaning the PS3 is selling it's typical 150k a month with PS4 sales looking like Wii U January 2013 sales months upon months in 2014. I'd bet Sony does not want to see a repeat of PS2 vs PS3 again. If Microsoft is smart, they'll let holiday 2013 be the 360's swan song and launch Durango in Q1/Q2 of 2014. I can see that strategy lead to the 360 getting close to 90 million and give Durango a heathy future forecast.
Everyone just saying to do the math on the total gen sales is way off base here. You can't just say 247m vs 240m is projecting a decline when the actual gaming consoles are both increasing and the Wii -> Wii U is accounting for the entire loss.
If the Durango and PS4 both sell more than their predecessors, that isn't a decline in Microsoft and Sony's eyes and there is no way they'd leave the console making business.
Everyone just saying to do the math on the total gen sales is way off base here. You can't just say 247m vs 240m is projecting a decline when the actual gaming consoles are both increasing and the Wii -> Wii U is accounting for the entire loss.
If the Durango and PS4 both sell more than their predecessors, that isn't a decline in Microsoft and Sony's eyes and there is no way they'd leave the console making business.
Isn't he basically saying "everyone will do fine"? Sounds like he lost his claws. Too bad.
Sure you can say it's due to people waking up to "Nintendo's bullshit", but that doesn't suddenly mean they're all going to jump on to the Sony/Microsoft offerings. What's more than likely, and is what many are assuming, is that they'll disappear and maybe show up at the second half of the cycle to pick up whichever system ended up with the most diverseIs there actually any proof of that happening?, seriously because i can't imagine that many gamers (especially hardcore gamers) moving from onsoles to play games on their phones or I-Pads, i just can't.
Imo you can't use the WiiU sales as evidence because all it is is evidence of consumers waking up to Nintendos bullshit and sales of PS360 going down (if they even are, i have no clue) will be more to do with this gen winding down and people ready for next gen.
So you're saying that his numbers will be correct if they're able to push into an entirely new market. Assuming they don't, there will be a contraction of overall sales.I cover the digital entertainment space for a hedge fund and these numbers are not at all unreasonable. If anything, they might be too low. I fully expect that once the music stops, the current generation will be in the 280 - 300m LTD sales range. I think the next generation has a reasonable shot at exceeding those numbers. One has to remember that this generation barely has any penetration in China where consoles are currently quasi banned. I expect that to change at some point in the near future opening up a huge new market with at least 50m genuine customers.
I fully expect Sony to do very well indeed because they appear to have addressed their weaknesses this generation (high launch MSRP, poor early multiplats) and focused on enhancing their strengths (strong first party and high attach rates).
Microsoft should be fine as well - they might lose some share in NA and the UK back to Sony (more a mean reversion than anything else) but they should have the best chance in the Chinese market. The other two are Japanese firms. Given the current political climate in East Asia Microsoft stands a great chance as positioning itself as the only non Japanese option. Their focus on TV services should help them attract more non gamers to the platform.
Pachter really is right about Nintendo. The Wii was lightning in a bottle. It allowed them to keep the core Nintendo faithful but also bring in a huge following of casuals. The latter are increasingly deserting them for mobile devices and the former while a solid base, are not really growing much. Given its graphical weaknesses and the increasingly poor 3rd party situation, core gamers are not going to care very much. Once the PS3 and the XBox 360 start slowing down in a year or two, I don't think 3rd parties will bother with the WiiU at all.
Information from Pachter on Neogaf should be punished with a ban or punch in the face of the topic creator!
This is... Certainly something.
I guess we'll see. But it just seems that he's not being partial. Nintendo having apparently less sales than MS and Sony but they're still 'King' in software? Unless there's a repeat from this gen, but looking at the Wii U sales, I don't think that will be the case in the same proportion. I'd be glad to be wrong though about Nintendo.
Are they not also considering that Sony has already PS4 preorders coming in? That has to help somehow, we'll see by E3 (with the release date info) if he can be right. But if the PS4 launches first, at the same price or similar, I will have a hard time believing his analysis.
So they planned to have a barren launch period, wherein their sales plummeted to dying system levels. Sounds like a well-thought out plan. They clearly thought that both A) NSMBU and B) Nintendo Land, and their tablet USP, would be sufficient to sell the system to the audience they were targeting - the expanded audience. It's all quite clearly not going to plan considering a 1.5M downward revision of their fiscal unit forecast, which they still won't meet given current sell through numbers. All this nonsense people spout about a soft launch is belied by Nintendo's own stated intentions.That's a rather distinctly different thing than just "core" or mainstream traditional console market that one would target if they were "trying to pull an XBOX 360/PS3". Nintendo perhaps wanted to straddle both the core traditional audience and the casual expanded audience. Currently they're failing to get either. They are getting the, as you call it, "Nintendo-core" the market that buys a system just for Nintendo games; the market that sustained the N64 and GCN.
The system was clearly designed to try and appeal to the expanded audience that they brought in with the Wii; perhaps they thought having a few token titles like Ninja Gaiden was sufficient to attract the traditional audiences to their platform. But in lieu of a traditional generational performance increase they have opted for a tablet controller to try and replicate catching lightning in a bottle. It's a replication of the Wii; only it's not replicating the Wii's commercial performance.
The reality of the situation is outlined above. They created a console that performance-wise is in the league of the current gen HD systems; that they intended to sell on their tablet function; that isn't getting the same multiplatform support as those 7th gen systems, nor their successor systems. They launched it with a bridge title and a title that is designed to show off their tablet.
That is not a strategy aimed at the core/mainstream markets that the 360 and PS3 targeted and sold to. Those audiences are not upgrading to the Wii U; as they presumably don't see it as an upgrade. And again, if that was their strategy; it was a terrible one - as evidenced by the current situation.
Sure you can say it's due to people waking up to "Nintendo's bullshit", but that doesn't suddenly mean they're all going to jump on to the Sony/Microsoft offerings. What's more than likely, and is what many are assuming, is that they'll disappear and maybe show up at the second half of the cycle to pick up whichever system ended up with the most diverse
catalog and a reasonable price (example: ps2).
So you're saying that his numbers will be correct if they're able to push into an entirely new market. Assuming they don't, there will be a contraction of overall sales.