• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo ditches main E3 conference, still there with games, press events, N-Direct

GSG Flash

Nobody ruins my family vacation but me...and maybe the boy!
Sucks for me because Nintendo's e3 conference is the one I look most forward to, Nintendo directs just aren't the same :(

In general though, I think this is a pretty bad decision. E3 atleast gets some air time on the local and national news, pretty much no one outside of dedicated gamers on the Internet know what Nintendo direct is.
 

Ponn

Banned
Even supposing hype is a good thing, why *can't* people get hyped for an ND in the a similar way to a conference?

I've yet to see anyone seriously argue they would watch the Press Conference but not the Nintendo Direct: Pre-E3 Conference Edition. You know why? Because it's the same thing, minus the live audience aspect. You're still watching a stream of people talking about video games.

Because you don't have every media, even regular news outlets, not just game media, at a live presser event designed to convey and interact with your audience in a professional way. Nintendo Directs are one step from a video on Gametrailers and won't be taken seriously, thats why. Nintendo Directs are great, but they are aimed towards current Nintendo console owners, not to entice general consumers.
 

L00P

Member
Nintendo not having a conference is a BIG deal. See, people watch these presentations with high expectations, which leaves them disappointed. It's fun watching those people. As you may have already known, Nintendo has been leading the industry when it comes to disappointments these past few years. So Nintendo not holding a press conference this year means that a SIGNIFICANT amount of disappointment will be diminished! What's the point of E3 without all those disappointments?!
 
Because you don't have every media, even regular news outlets, not just game media, at a live presser event designed to convey and interact with your audience in a professional way. Nintendo Directs are one step from a video on Gametrailers and won't be taken seriously, thats why. Nintendo Directs are great, but they are aimed towards current Nintendo console owners, not to entice general consumers.
They're having a special hands on demo presentation for the press at E3 at the time they would usually have a conference. Do you really think if Time and USA Today are at E3 that Nintendo wouldn't invite them to the private press only event?

If you were a journalist would you rather sit through another E3 conference that's padded with stupid celebrity performances and sales numbers or go straight to a private event where you get hands on time with what you came to play?
 

Ponn

Banned
They're having a special hands on demo presentation for the press at E3 at the time they would usually have a conference. Do you really think if Time and USA Today are at E3 that Nintendo wouldn't invite them to the private press only event?

If you were a journalist would you rather sit through another E3 conference that's padded with stupid celebrity performances and sales numbers or go straight to a private event where you get hands on time with what you came to play?

Take a moment, think about past E3's. What can you tell me about the closed door hands on impressions of games from each E3? Now tell me what you saw in the mass media and being reported from the conferences? One of those, even as a gaffer, will come to mind alot quicker and more prevalent. Now put yourself in the shoes of joe schmo consumer not watching Nintendo Directs and going by the headline blurbs coming out of E3. You have the perception that will be conveyed by the media jaded by Nintendo not being there and the strong word of mouth that will follow and trickle right down to Gamestop employee talking to the guy coming into buy a Wii U. "Man I don't know, Nintendo wasn't even at E3 this year bro, shit looks bad. Wanna preorder a Durango instead?"

We have precedence here with the Vita, look up comments and media about Vita from last years E3 and YOSP said right after their conference they made the decision to go with games on the floor and closed door events and we know the results. This in no way whatsoever can be spun as a good thing for Nintendo. When sales on your console are tanking and in the face of competition coming in 6 months your genius marketing move shouldn't be to play shrinking violet.
 

Terrell

Member
If Nintendo announces a ton of impressive games and content, and splits it up to all the different media sources, and it trickles to all gamers everywhere, all anyone will be doing is scratching their heads as to why the heck ninty didnt blow it out with the hype at a conference like they've done in the past.
They're not presenting some content at one event and some at others. It's going to be the same content, presented with context that's relevant to the audience.
 

Terrell

Member
We have precedence here with the Vita, look up comments and media about Vita from last years E3 and YOSP said right after their conference they made the decision to go with games on the floor and closed door events and we know the results. This in no way whatsoever can be spun as a good thing for Nintendo. When sales on your console are tanking and in the face of competition coming in 6 months your genius marketing move shouldn't be to play shrinking violet.
You're making the assumption that the execution will be the same as Sony's, and we already know it won't be. This isn't a matter of "go find the games yourselves to cover them", there's a dedicated event for the press to let them discuss these games in a context that's relevant to the press. The only spinning going on is this false dichotomy you're weaving.
 
Take a moment, think about past E3's. What can you tell me about the closed door hands on impressions of games from each E3? Now tell me what you saw in the mass media and being reported from the conferences? One of those, even as a gaffer, will come to mind alot quicker and more prevalent. Now put yourself in the shoes of joe schmo consumer not watching Nintendo Directs and going by the headline blurbs coming out of E3. You have the perception that will be conveyed by the media jaded by Nintendo not being there and the strong word of mouth that will follow and trickle right down to Gamestop employee talking to the guy coming into buy a Wii U. "Man I don't know, Nintendo wasn't even at E3 this year bro, shit looks bad. Wanna preorder a Durango instead?"

We have precedence here with the Vita, look up comments and media about Vita from last years E3 and YOSP said right after their conference they made the decision to go with games on the floor and closed door events and we know the results. This in no way whatsoever can be spun as a good thing for Nintendo. When sales on your console are tanking and in the face of competition coming in 6 months your genius marketing move shouldn't be to play shrinking violet.
You do know what Joe Schmo probably isn't home during E3 right? Joe Schmo is working his day job while the press conferences are on and either picking up his information from news outlets on his phone or when he gets home. Joe Schmo has to take off work to watch E3, and more Joe Schmos just go to work and find out the news later. The vast majority of people interested in video games aren't watching E3 live. You and I are not Joe Schmo. You and I are Joe Enthusiast.

And for the last time, Nintendo will be at E3. I don't know why people think that just because they aren't holding pre-E3 conference that they won't be there. The press is even getting special attention and getting private times with what they came to see, like movie studios do for film critics.

And I can tell you for the past couple years of E3 I mostly remember thinking "That's it, really?" It isn't what it was before. It's become repetitive, boring, predictable and underwhelming recently. If there weren't new console releases this year and I didn't hate having to check my phone every 5 minutes I was fully prepared to be like the majority of the Joe Schmos and go to work and just get my info later.

Yeah things that happened back in 2007 were great, but that was 5 years ago and it's slowly been declining since. All people did last year after E3 was say that Ubisoft won and that E3 "Wasn't for us" anymore. Now all the sudden Nintendo decide to do something new and give everyone the information they're most interested in in their own separate events, and people are complaining that they aren't doing the same exact thing they spend every post E3 griping about.
 

breakfuss

Member
Now all the sudden Nintendo decide to do something new and give everyone the information they're most interested in in their own separate events, and people are complaining that they aren't doing the same exact thing they spend every post E3 griping about.

Lol, you really believe that this is Nintendo's way of bucking a trend? Marching to their own beat? Really, now?
 

Dr.Hadji

Member
Lol, you really believe that this is Nintendo's way of bucking a trend? Marching to their own beat? Really, now?

That's clearly what it is. Because they are bucking a trend and doing it in a way they see fit. No one here thinks they're doing it solely to be quirky and different though. Obviously there are other factors in Nintendo making this choice.
 
Did you guys REALLY want a large scale conference where it starts out with the song, "wii will, wii will, rock U!" followed by reggie running out in a sleeveless shirt with his arms in the air with his fists clutched with fog shooting everywhere with glitter falling from the sky with a big Nintendo logo in the background flashing on and off?

well i do...
 

PBY

Banned
Even supposing hype is a good thing, why *can't* people get hyped for an ND in the a similar way to a conference?

I've yet to see anyone seriously argue they would watch the Press Conference but not the Nintendo Direct: Pre-E3 Conference Edition. You know why? Because it's the same thing, minus the live audience aspect. You're still watching a stream of people talking about video games.

The Press is still getting their own show. Are they not hiring out the Nokia Theatre once again?
Live>pre recorded.
 

rpmurphy

Member
Did you guys REALLY want a large scale conference where it starts out with the song, "wii will, wii will, rock you!" followed by reggie running out in a sleeveless shirt with his arms in the air with his fists clutched with fog shooting everywhere with glitter falling from the sky with a big Nintendo logo in the background flashing on and off?

Well I do...
Absolutely. No, not really (unless they go full Konami), but the main redeeming factor for these conferences in the past some years has been the stage fluff and it's a bit of a waste of time to actually watch if not an agonizing experience to do so. The Sony and MS conferences have gone pretty ridiculous with it lately too. Trailers and such they could release anytime and anywhere and the Nintendo Directs have been a good place for that.
 

B-52

Neo Member
This makes me think Nintendo just isn't prepared for E3. Which makes me think they don't have a plan of where to take the WiiU. Which makes me think Nintendo is in trouble. This is the one time of the year where everyone is watching, from Neogaf to USAToday, and Nintendo is downsizing its appearance.

Hopefully they are using this time to retool and come up with an actual strategy and plan for where to take the company. Sony has so far branded their box as a platform for the hardcore gamer, Microsoft seemingly is going for the all in one entertainment box, and Nintendo is still having trouble convincing the general public that the WiiU isn't just a portable screen for their Wii console.
 
This makes me think Nintendo just isn't prepared for E3. Which makes me think they don't have a plan of where to take the WiiU. Which makes me think Nintendo is in trouble. This is the one time of the year where everyone is watching, from Neogaf to USAToday, and Nintendo is downsizing its appearance.

Hopefully they are using this time to retool and come up with an actual strategy and plan for where to take the company. Sony has so far branded their box as a platform for the hardcore gamer, Microsoft seemingly is going for the all in one entertainment box, and Nintendo is still having trouble convincing the general public that the WiiU isn't just a portable screen for their Wii console.

All their strategically placed ND's will be about how Nintendos doomed :'-(
 

TwiztidElf

Member
animation2ysf00.gif
 

hellclerk

Everything is tsundere to me
Live>pre recorded.

Sure, but what does the investment into creating and running a large live presser give back in terms of Return on Investment? Live ROI < Prerecorded+focused events ROI, and that's what Nintendo's thinking. Their loss of your interest in the spectacle of a large live event is secondary to the gaining of your interest in discovering software you might not have noticed otherwise because it gets lost in the AAA conference rush.
 

Misterhbk

Member
My god the meltdowns we'll see at E3.

Either this is going to blow up in Ninty's face and no one will give a crap about the Wii U, which I guess keeps them exactly where they are now, or people will realize they actually have software coming and might start to buy the system.

Of course, a price drop will have to be coming because without it I don't see anyone picking up a Wii U over a PS4 or Durango this holiday season. Hype levels for next gen consoles will be through the roof after E3 and the marketing campaigns will probably start picking up as well.
 

Wynnebeck

Banned
My god the meltdowns we'll see at E3.

Either this is going to blow up in Ninty's face and no one will give a crap about the Wii U, which I guess keeps them exactly where they are now, or people will realize they actually have software coming and might start to buy the system.

Of course, a price drop will have to be coming because without it I don't see anyone picking up a Wii U over a PS4 or Durango this holiday season. Hype levels for next gen consoles will be through the roof after E3 and the marketing campaigns will probably start picking up as well.

I'd be more inclined to think people would know if Nintendo had a conference like everyone else. Talking at the water cooler about Nintendo's E3 press conference is more hype inducing then:

"Oh Jim, did you hear about the new Nintendo Direct?"

"The Nintendo what?"
 

Skiesofwonder

Walruses, camels, bears, rabbits, tigers and badgers.
I'd be more inclined to think people would know if Nintendo had a conference like everyone else. Talking at the water cooler about Nintendo's E3 press conference is more hype inducing then:

"Oh Jim, did you hear about the new Nintendo Direct?"

"The Nintendo what?"

I don't know what "water-coolers" you hang out at, but bringing up E3 would get that same response at the ones I frequent.

In fact, anybody I know that knows what E3 is usually knows enough about the gaming industry to be familiar with Nintendo Directs.
 

Shiggy

Member
I don't know what "water-coolers" you hang out at, but bringing up E3 would get that same response at the ones I frequent.

In fact, anybody I know that knows what E3 is usually knows enough about the gaming industry to be familiar with Nintendo Directs.

I think what he means is that outside of the gaming media and Nintendo die-hard fans, nobody cares about Nintendo Directs.
 

Skiesofwonder

Walruses, camels, bears, rabbits, tigers and badgers.
I think what he means is that outside of the gaming media and Nintendo die-hard fans, nobody cares about Nintendo Directs.


And I'm saying that the same thing can pretty much be said for E3 as well. Outside of the gaming enthusiasts, most people don't give a shit about E3 and will find information that they are interested in through the gaming or mainstream media. Last time I checked, Super Smash Bros Brawl was revealed at a closed door Nintendo E3 roundtable and the first footage leaked was a shitty cellphone video, yet that was one of the biggest events/reveals of E3 2006.

As for the gaming enthusiasts, I fail to see the difference between the interested consumers streaming a E3 Nintendo press conference compared to them streaming an E3 Nintendo Direct. The games will still be on the floor and the press will still be reporting on them.
 

Shiggy

Member
And I'm saying that the same thing can pretty much be said for E3 as well. Outside of the gaming enthusiasts, most people don't give a shit about E3 and will find information that they are interested in through the gaming or mainstream media. Last time I checked, Super Smash Bros Brawl was revealed at a closed door Nintendo E3 roundtable and the first footage leaked was a shitty cellphone video, yet that was one of the biggest events/reveals of E3 2006.


Sorry, but this is not true - at least in my country. All news sites and even TV news do cover the major E3 news over here, and Germany is well-known for its kind of critical stance towards the industry and its view on violence. In contrast, Nintendo Directs obviously have yet to find any mention there.
From what I've read in this thread, it's pretty similar in other countries.


As for the gaming enthusiasts, I fail to see the difference between the interested consumers streaming a E3 Nintendo press conference compared to them streaming an E3 Nintendo Direct. The games will still be on the floor and the press will still be reporting on them.

True. Nintendo didn't have a press conference at some Gamescom, yet they still appeared on the news as they were on the showfloor itself.

So in the end I think we actually both agree that it won't have a major effect as long as they still present their games.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
Sorry, but this is not true - at least in my country. All news sites and even TV news do cover the major E3 news over here, and Germany is well-known for its kind of critical stance towards the industry and its view on violence. In contrast, Nintendo Directs obviously have yet to find any mention there.
From what I've read in this thread, it's pretty similar in other countries.
Why even mention past Directs weren't shown there after establishing they only cover big events like E3 rather than all gaming news? If they do a Direct, it will still be a part of their E3 showing, but not for the press. The press will be there to see and play what Nintendo has for them, live and hands on, and report on that, if they think it's worth reporting. Not the Direct which we don't even know if they're doing (though gaming websites would obviously comment on it). A conference wouldn't be a guarantee of a report either. Presumably it would have the same content as whatever they have set up to show in this different way. If that doesn't excite the journalists in that way it wouldn't excite them in a streamed conference. Not that I think they should avoid writing negative impressions but they're likely just gonna skip everything in the mainstream media rather than be critical.

Anyway, here they might get an ignorant and vague blurb about big events like E3 on some news session.

More often anything like that is gonna be some paid presentation about how awesome the new product x is, not based on a particular event.
 
I guess the means by which they introduce and deliver their products is more important than the product being delivered. Go figure, it's Nintendo!
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
I guess the means by which they introduce and deliver their products is more important than the product being delivered. Go figure, it's Nintendo!
Can you explain what you mean?


Are they putting too much thought in how to handle E3 while the others don't care at all because it's not important so they don't waste effort and funds in their presentations of new games and systems?
 
Sorry, but this is not true - at least in my country. All news sites and even TV news do cover the major E3 news over here, and Germany is well-known for its kind of critical stance towards the industry and its view on violence. In contrast, Nintendo Directs obviously have yet to find any mention there.
From what I've read in this thread, it's pretty similar in other countries.

Not in the US. Maybe in the nearby area of the event, but Mid-West to East coast couldn't give a crap unless they believe gaming is scrambling their children's brains.

I'm not surprised about Germany though. I have close friends there who say that traditional gaming is far more integrated there in day-to-day motions .
 

Skiesofwonder

Walruses, camels, bears, rabbits, tigers and badgers.
Sorry, but this is not true - at least in my country. All news sites and even TV news do cover the major E3 news over here, and Germany is well-known for its kind of critical stance towards the industry and its view on violence. In contrast, Nintendo Directs obviously have yet to find any mention there.
From what I've read in this thread, it's pretty similar in other countries.




True. Nintendo didn't have a press conference at some Gamescom, yet they still appeared on the news as they were on the showfloor itself.

So in the end I think we actually both agree that it won't have a major effect as long as they still present their games.

We do, and I don't mean to give the impression that Nintendo Directs are on the same level as E3. But assuming they go the Nintendo Direct route, this will be an E3-specific Nintendo Direct (or two) that will lead into the majority of the games being playable on the show floor and covered by press. I just don't see the difference between it being shown live or pre-recorded. It is still Nintendo's E3 conference. If Zelda WiiU is revealed, it will ultimately recieve the same amount of coverage and hype as it would if it was revealed at their live press conference (IMO).
 
Can you explain what you mean?


Are they putting too much thought in how to handle E3 while the others don't care at all and don't waste effort and funds in their presentations of new games and systems?
Huh? Actually I'm amused at the stance some have taken for or against this decision. What's important? The games or how they are made palpable? Sometimes it appears Nintendo's decisions are ridiculed simply because they R Nintendo.
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
Huh? Actually I'm amused at the stance some have taken for or against this decision. What's important? The games or how they are made palpable? Sometimes it appears Nintendo's decisions are ridiculed simply because they R Nintendo.
Ah, sorry, thought you aimed the comment at Nintendo rather than the posters. Read it like that to see what I mean ^_^;;

Sorry, but there's been worse in here :D

In that case, agreed.
 
Ah, sorry, thought you aimed the comment at Nintendo rather than the posters. Read it like that to see what I mean ^_^;;

Sorry, but there's been worse in here :D

In that case, agreed.
Actually, after re-reading my post, I can see why U would in the first instance and pose the question U did. Glad to clarify though.
 

Bulzeeb

Member
as someone who doesn't live in the US I see no problem at all because conference of not I'll be going online and look for the streaming video I guess this only hurts hard some of the game journalist sites because they won't be getting a traffic increase
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
as someone who doesn't live in the US I see no problem at all because conference of not I'll be going online and look for the streaming video I guess this only hurts hard some of the game journalist sites because they won't be getting a traffic increase
They will be getting a traffic increase by talking about two new systems.

Also about what Nintendo will show them, which will at least differ slightly to what we will see directly from them online.

The hands ons too.
 

OryoN

Member
Sucks for me because Nintendo's e3 conference is the one I look most forward to, Nintendo directs just aren't the same :(

In general though, I think this is a pretty bad decision. E3 atleast gets some air time on the local and national news, pretty much no one outside of dedicated gamers on the Internet know what Nintendo direct is.

To address your second point first; do you think the general public cares about E3 press conferences? In other words, the same folks that sit and watch those conferences are the same ones that'll watch a Nintendo direct. In either case, it's the enthusiastic gamer that cares. In either case, Nintendo WILL have games at the event, and WILL have media to cover them. Ultimately, Nintendo believes they've found a more effective way of doing something they've being doing generally one way, for years. We can at least give them the benefit of the doubt.

Concerning your first point; You may have been out of the loop lately, but have you not seen Nintendo's E3 conferences for the last few years? You'll have a hard time finding any reasonable person who didn't think the January Wii U Ninentendo Direct totally blew away their recent E3 conferences. Conclusion: Content matters more than presentation format!

Not to pick on you. Just using your post as an chance to address much of the same statements I've been seeing throughout the thread. I think you all have been neglecting the bolded statement above, as though this new format prevents them from having a stellar showing.
 

liger05

Member
Applauding Nintendo for Stepping Off Center Stage
April 26, 2013 12:07PM PDT

By Tom Mc Shea, Editor

&#9837;Tom Mc Shea praises Nintendo for calling off its E3 press conference and urges other companies to follow suit.&#9834;

The Electronic Entertainment Expo is a hedonistic display of excess. Companies filter their beguiling messaging through self-aggrandizing charades, and we're all too happy to go along for the ride. We've grown enamored with this bombastic propaganda, we crave it; so when a company squashes our expectations, we raise our hackles. Nintendo, whose press conferences were the highlight of so many prior E3s, is now going in a new direction. No longer will Reggie Fils-Aime exchange cringe-worthy banter with one of his pliant subordinates, nor will Shigeru Miyamoto exude playful exuberance. The book has been closed on Nintendo's dog-and-pony festivities, and it's one small but important step toward reimagining this tired exposition.

When Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo outline their plans, everyone listens, because these three companies hold considerable sway over the future of the industry. And it's at their once-a-year press conferences where they reveal the bulk of their secrets. New hardware, accessories, games, business models, partnerships, and more are announced to the sequestered masses. But what is it that draws us to these events? Is it the discussion of sales data always delivered through a rose-tinted lens? Or maybe it's the impromptu dance numbers and workout routines? How about stilted teleprompter reading? Press conferences are an awkward tableau whose sole redeeming quality--game announcements--is shrouded behind a veil of painful marketing speak that only serves to puff up the presenter.

Nintendo should be commended for breaking this cycle. Instead of herding media members to a far-away locale, pouring copious amounts of time and money into an elaborate production, they can instead record a much more subdued presentation that cuts straight to the heart of why we so eagerly follow this event. A simple video showing upcoming Wii U games would be more than enough to excite those who bleed every color of the Pikmin rainbow, and we won't have to sit through the endless monologues that so often plague full-blown press conferences. Nintendo has shown they can deliver speedy announcements with the semi-regular Nintendo Direct series, so there's no reason to think they're taking a backseat at E3 just because they're eschewing the press conference format.

The timing of this change is the lone issue that could cause Nintendo grief. Wii U sales are slumping, and not only has Nintendo failed to release the self-published games that were due within the launch window, but it has done a lousy job of courting third-party developers. So the most pessimistic could see Nintendo's retreat as a sign of weakness. It has so little to show, or is so intimidated by its competitors' entries into the next generation, that it's fleeing from the spotlight. When leaders make a decision, after all, it's because they're smart and forward thinking. But Nintendo, who has been playing catch-up since the Wii train derailed years ago, isn't allowed to buck tradition without meeting resistance. It's an unfair accusation, and one that Nintendo will be branded with until it delivers on the promises it has yet to fulfill.

Although Nintendo's stance is a bold one, there is still much more work that has to be done. E3 has grown fat and lazy with all the attention that has been heaped on it. Games, the reason we're so invested in this industry to begin with, should be the most important aspect of this annual event. But the inherent fun of checking out an expansive slate of upcoming experiences has been overshadowed by companies that continually try to dazzle our senses through other methods. Loud music blares through the convention center, scantily clad women patrol booths, and oversized television screens play prerendered trailers on a never-ending loop. Although such problems don't seem like a concern to the average person, they are. The suffocating stimuli hinders one's ability to think, so publishers are hurting their own chance for thoughtful coverage by use a megaphone to blast their message.

The video game industry is built on trends, so often a company currently playing second fiddle is happy to follow the leader. Now that Nintendo has decided to pass on the press conference shenanigans, maybe its competitors will think seriously about the advantages to leaving the pomp and circumstance behind. Sony's reveal of Uncharted 4 would be just as exciting without the gasps from its captive audience, and Microsoft would be able to show off the next iteration of the Kinect in an environment better suited to camera-controlled gaming. The press conferences are already streamed across the globe, so people are already able to share the experience together, and the benefit of a live audience is offset by the massive problems such productions create. Streams lag or stop entirely when demands are so high, and coordinating such an event takes more planning and money than its worth. These companies would be better off doing small-scale productions where the games, not the spectacle, bask in the spotlight, and it

Press conferences are just one area in need of renovation. Just imagine if one developer scaled back the desperate opulence of its booth. No more intimidating constructions or distracting lights vying for your attention, and no more beautiful models hired as dehumanizing eye candy. Instead, there would be consoles and games lined up in a neat and orderly fashion, and people from development teams would be on hand to answer any questions. If one publisher were to take this route, just one, and still had crowds on hand, maybe the rest would realize how silly their expensive and exploitative efforts were. The only reason that a company would need unnecessary fluff to attract attention is if its games weren't good enough to be worthy on their own, so publishers would be shamed into having a more straightforward approach lest we realize their lack of confidence.

The industry is going through a transition. There's no telling how this next console cycle will be met, or what new business models will be used to squeeze every penny from eager customers. But it's clear that companies have been taking themselves way too seriously and they need to take a step back. The Electronic Entertainment Expo is a time for the world to see how the industry functions, so it's important that we put our best foot forward. Nintendo has made a wise decision to forgo its customary press conference for something more grounded than what we'd expect, and we can only hope that other companies take strides in the coming years to ensure that games take center stage.

http://uk.gamespot.com/features/appl...stage-6407575/
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
He too is jumping the gun, just pro instead of anti.

I do agree with some of his points though we don't know if that's what Nintendo has in store.
 

TunaLover

Member
I got the feeling they have no announcements for this year, aside the already know titles revealed in the previous ND, and I think Nintendo will take an even more conservative stance towards release only sure `not risky` titles, at least until they are able to stabilise its reds numbers, mainly with 3DS acting as an air supply for WiiU. Once things are more stable for them I can see more support for WiiU, including third party partnerships, and co-developments.
 

Morfeo

The Chuck Norris of Peace
I got the feeling they have no announcements for this year, aside the already know titles revealed in the previous ND, and I think Nintendo will take an even more conservative stance towards release only sure `not risky` titles, at least until they are able to stabilise its reds numbers, mainly with 3DS acting as an air supply for WiiU. Once things are more stable for them I can see more support for WiiU, including third party partnerships, and co-developments.

Quiet you! They will bring us Shenmue 3, F-Zero UX, Metroid Another M and the next game from Retro Studios! BELIEVE!
 

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
I got the feeling they have no announcements for this year, aside the already know titles revealed in the previous ND, and I think Nintendo will take an even more conservative stance towards release only sure `not risky` titles, at least until they are able to stabilise its reds numbers, mainly with 3DS acting as an air supply for WiiU. Once things are more stable for them I can see more support for WiiU, including third party partnerships, and co-developments.
What does this guessing have to do with the thread about their E3 plan changes? Are you implying they changed the format because they have no announcements as if they've never had lackluster conferences? Even the known stuff that they've not exactly blown their load over since they only announced them to hype their E3 by simply telling people to look forward to them there, would make for a way better showing than some previous years. It's not like anyone was shocked by the news that those games are in development, just pleased to know they'll get to see them at E3. I don't see what's so conservative and safe about things like Fire Emblem x SMT and X (especially after Xenoblade not exactly being a system seller) either. Plus, E3 isn't just about WiiU, they also have a platform that doesn't have those issues to the same degree to continue pimping and establishing...
 
Top Bottom