Metascore predictions guys ?
For me 97. xP
I'll say 93.
Metascore predictions guys ?
For me 97. xP
AightThe initial file is 120MB or so and then the next install takes about 15-20 minutes. At least for me thats what it was.
I have to admit I'm starting to get pretty excited about this release despite myself and Naughty Dog's output this gen. Something just tells me this one is going to turn out alright, and it seems to be scratching a particular itch I didn't know I had at the moment.
I have to admit I'm starting to get pretty excited about this release despite myself and Naughty Dog's output this gen. Something just tells me this one is going to turn out alright, and it seems to be scratching a particular itch I didn't know I had at the moment.
Metascore predictions guys ?
For me 97. xP
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
Metascore predictions guys ?
For me 97. xP
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
Why does the community at large give Metacritic so much weight? I just took Experimental Psychology and when you're analyzing results and scores, stuff like means are probably the least accurate description of the overall results because a single outlier score can pull the entire mean one way or another and misrepresent the actual results.Metascore predictions guys ?
For me 97. xP
Why does the community at large give Metacritic so much weight? I just took Experimental Psychology and when you're analyzing results and scores, stuff like means are probably the least accurate description of the overall results because a single outlier score can pull the entire mean one way or another and misrepresent the actual results.
Personally I don't give much mind to a number scores. A number is an arbitrary designation, a singular icon that somehow has to represent every flaw and every success in a game. And that's just utter impossible.
What does a score of 7 or 8 or 8.5 even mean? I mean just look at the response to the Edge score. A 10 has weight because perfect scores has weight. But a perfect score from OPM? Disregarding because so many games have been awarded 5/5. Same scores, different meanings. For this reason alone reviews that give the same score aren't comparable and that's not even considering the actual review.
What matters is the content of a review. Describing what worked, what didn't, why, how it could have been improved. Maybe those good points are subtle. Maybe what amounts to a major flaw for a reviewer is only minor for another. But how can a number score explain all that? It can't.
Why does the community at large give Metacritic so much weight? I just took Experimental Psychology and when you're analyzing results and scores, stuff like means are probably the least accurate description of the overall results because a single outlier score can pull the entire mean one way or another and misrepresent the actual results.
Personally I don't give much mind to a number scores. A number is an arbitrary designation, a singular icon that somehow has to represent every flaw and every success in a game. And that's just utter impossible.
What does a score of 7 or 8 or 8.5 even mean? I mean just look at the response to the Edge score. A 10 has weight because perfect scores has weight. But a perfect score from OPM? Disregarding because so many games have been awarded 5/5. Same scores, different meanings. For this reason alone reviews that give the same score aren't comparable and that's not even considering the actual review.
What matters is the content of a review. Describing what worked, what didn't, why, how it could have been improved. Maybe those good points are subtle. Maybe what amounts to a major flaw for a reviewer is only minor for another. But how can a number score explain all that? It can't.
Perfect postWhy does the community at large give Metacritic so much weight? I just took Experimental Psychology and when you're analyzing results and scores, stuff like means are probably the least accurate description of the overall results because a single outlier score can pull the entire mean one way or another and misrepresent the actual results.
Personally I don't give much mind to a number scores. A number is an arbitrary designation, a singular icon that somehow has to represent every flaw and every success in a game. And that's just utter impossible.
What does a score of 7 or 8 or 8.5 even mean? I mean just look at the response to the Edge score. A 10 has weight because perfect scores has weight. But a perfect score from OPM? Disregarding because so many games have been awarded 5/5. Same scores, different meanings. For this reason alone reviews that give the same score aren't comparable and that's not even considering the actual review.
What matters is the content of a review. Describing what worked, what didn't, why, how it could have been improved. Maybe those good points are subtle. Maybe what amounts to a major flaw for a reviewer is only minor for another. But how can a number score explain all that? It can't.
Well, I was hoping to start a discussion. Wasn't singling you outI agree with that. It is an only simply question
Oh so patronizingIsn't it cute when someone takes a college course and thinks they are suddenly an expert on the topic?
I'm not invalidating what you are saying, I just find it amusing.
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
Not watching it, but damn that dude looks like a 5 years younger Joel
I am a Psych major and did take a entire course involving analyzing statistical results, rankings, scores, etc.Isn't it cute when someone takes a college course and thinks they are suddenly an expert on the topic?
I'm not invalidating what you are saying, I just find it amusing.
Not watching it, but damn that dude looks like a 5 years younger Joel
Isn't it cute when someone takes a college course and suddenly thinks they are an expert on the topic?
I'm not invalidating what you are saying, I just find it amusing.
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
Letting a little of dat hype are we?
Describe dat itch
92.Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
It was a completely reasonable post, I was just being a dick.I am a Psych major and did take a entire course involving analyzing statistical results, rankings, scores, etc.
So I'm definitely not an expert but I do I have some knowledge, at least about the validity of a mean.
But that's beside the point of my comment
What kind of candy is the real questionMetascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
I don't hate Metacritc. I understand the convenience of a quick single score to see if a game is good or not. But I just think that people put way too much emphasis on a score and not the content of the reviews that make up the score, for the reasons you saw in my postMetascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
i dont play these kinds of games, but damn... all this media so far making me want to spend money.
Sony finally getting the hang of marketingThat is seriously one of the most effective commercials I've ever seen for a game. And for once, i don't think it's off in tone either.
Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
I don't hate it. I understand the convenience of a quick single score to see if a game is good or not. But I just think that people put way too much emphasis on a score and not the content of the reviews that make up the score
Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
DukeBobby - 93
Badosh - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
More_Badass - Hates Metacritic (good post btw)
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
Sony finally getting the hang of marketing
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
I'm sure the game will sell wellIF the game is good, I really hope marketing of that calibre is rewarded. It'd really send the wrong message if even that couldn't break through.
IF the game is good, I really hope marketing of that calibre is rewarded. It'd really send the wrong message if even that couldn't break through.
The real question is, who has the balls to place their bet below 90?
Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
Alchemy - 97
Ricky_R - 95
VanCityGamer - 94
GribbleGrunger - 94
DukeBobby - 93
jacksepticeye - 93
Badosh - 92
Vire - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
Me.
Put me in for 88.