• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

COD Ghosts Xbox One offline (2 weeks before launch) not possible without Live?

BibiMaghoo

Member
So...

MS can now brick consoles entirely at the flick of a swtich? I get they have only banned them until launch, but this means they can ban offline play on unconnected machines, instead of just banning the console from live.

That is pretty fucked up.
 

PBY

Banned
So...

MS can now brick consoles entirely at the flick of a swtich? I get they have only banned them until launch, but this means they can ban offline play on unconnected machines, instead of just banning the console from live.

That is pretty fucked up.
Sony can too- basically any system that can push OS firmware updates can.
 
"This behavior is only because we are in pre-release."

Seems to suggest that it's not the Day 1 patch.

Yes, that's what everybody has already concluded. He'll be fine come launch and so will everybody else when they get the official Day 1 patch. Did you read any of the other comments before posting?

MS can now brick consoles entirely at the flick of a swtich? I get they have only banned them until launch, but this means they can ban offline play on unconnected machines, instead of just banning the console from live.

That is pretty fucked up.

They can as of right now because by them banning you, you don't get the latest SW to make the system operate. I think once the Day 1 patch is live and people get banned post launch your console won't be bricked like his was
 

BibiMaghoo

Member
Sony can too- basically any system that can push OS firmware updates can.

Previously, these systems could be banned from live and PSN, and the actual user account could be banned. This does not in any way brick the system, offline play is still possible on both.

Do you have any evidence that Sony will now be capable of bricking systems when banned? I have seen none. This is the first sign of any company being able to do this.
 

PBY

Banned
Previously, these systems could be banned from live and PSN, and the actual user account could be banned. This does not in any way brick the system, offline play is still possible on both.

Do you have any evidence that Sony will now be capable of bricking systems when banned? I have seen none. This is the first sign of any company being able to do this.
If Sony pushes an update that breaks the OS the same thing will happen.

Basically- nothing to see here. The same thing was possible last gen.
 

turnbuckle

Member
So THAT's why the PS4 box said Offline Enabled (taken from here)

e4uKhTG.png

Not sure if it's been mentioned or not, but I don't have the "offline enabled" box on my copy of killzone. But it does say "optional". I like that wording better than "enabled".

s6cvHIC.jpg
 

BibiMaghoo

Member
If Sony pushes an update that breaks the OS the same thing will happen.

Basically- nothing to see here. The same thing was possible last gen.

No, It was never, ever used. In any situation. This is actually a case of it being used, and you say nothing to see here?

This is the very first time, ever, a system ban has blocked a user from playing offline, in the history of consoles. That is massive. That is not nothing. I disregard the first sentence of your post, because it is unfounded nonsense, you cannot backup in any way.
 
No, It was never, ever used. In any situation. This is actually a case of it being used, and you say nothing to see here?

This is the very first time, ever, a system ban has blocked a user from playing offline, in the history of consoles. That is massive. That is not nothing. I disregard the first sentence of your post, because it is unfounded nonsense, you cannot backup in any way.

It's not the ban that bricked his console
 

PBY

Banned
No, It was never, ever used. In any situation. This is actually a case of it being used, and you say nothing to see here?

This is the very first time, ever, a system ban has blocked a user from playing offline, in the history of consoles. That is massive. That is not nothing. I disregard the first sentence of your post, because it is unfounded nonsense, you cannot backup in any way.
They didn't brick it on purpose. His OS expired- because it's not final.

There's no conspiracy. It's not massive.
 

iammeiam

Member
No, It was never, ever used. In any situation. This is actually a case of it being used, and you say nothing to see here?

This is the very first time, ever, a system ban has blocked a user from playing offline, in the history of consoles. That is massive. That is not nothing. I disregard the first sentence of your post, because it is unfounded nonsense, you cannot backup in any way.

MS certainly had the ability to remote brick systems last gen--I don't think they ever used it, but we know from the dashboard betas that they could target specific updates to specific consoles. All they'd have had to do was target a console with an update that bricked the system/rendered the OS useless, or had an expiration date, and once the user accepted the update prompt, said used would be screwed.

They almost certainly never used the ability, or we'd have heard about it, but that doesn't mean they couldn't do it. They didn't block this guy from offline by bricking his system, here--he's in a weird limbo because the OS he's supposed to have doesn't exist yet, and he stumbled into some temporary OS version for a day. If MS ever strips offline from a omebody with the actual functioning retail OS, a shitstorm will rightly ensue. That's not what happened here.
 

Fistwell

Member
His OS expired- because it's not final.
So they actually, officially confirmed that's what's happened, good to know.

We understand this is obviously an issue that is dear to your heart, but
o4z.png

It's safe to say your mission here is done, you can give it a rest. :)
 

Parakeetman

No one wants a throne you've been sitting on!
They didn't brick it on purpose. His OS expired- because it's not final.

There's no conspiracy. It's not massive.

Hey peterb0y I think you dropped this. Wanted to give it back since figured you cant get back into the building without it.


Jokes aside though, kinda wondering what your angle on the whole situation is since have not seen someone so rabidly defend something since when I came across a family of wild boars in the mountains. Am sure Im not the only one here wondering the same thing.
 

PBY

Banned
Hey peterb0y I think you dropped this. Wanted to give it back since figured you cant get back into the building without it.



Jokes aside though, kinda wondering what your angle on the whole situation is since have not seen someone so rabidly defend something since when I came across a family of wild boars in the mountains. Am sure Im not the only one here wondering the same thing.

I'm "rabidly" defending the truth? I barely post on the game side, but the launch has brought out a lot of craziness, which I find interesting. In this case, I was actually up late at night writing a paper, and this topic helped me stay up.

I actually think that you calling me a MS apologist- when I'm actually just defending common sense and rationality- is annoying. Not even getting a Bone likely til Titanfall or after, very excited to get my launch ps4.
 
I'm "rabidly" defending the truth? I barely post on the game side, but the launch has brought out a lot of craziness, which I find interesting. In this case, I was actually up late at night writing a paper, and this topic helped me stay up.

I actually think that you calling me a MS apologist- when I'm actually just defending common sense and rationality- is annoying. Not even getting a Bone likely til Titanfall or after, very excited to get my launch ps4.

It's funny how just because you present the facts of an argument or the opposing side others think you have an agenda. Happened to me in another thread. It's nice having somebody who actually understands thing clarify everything rather than a bunch of people making up stuff and grasping at staws
 
This astroturfer blame game is getting ridiculous to the point where anyone you disagree with is now an astroturfer. Can people leave this shit to the mods? It does nothing except derail the discussion into pointless fingerpointing.
 

BibiMaghoo

Member
I'm "rabidly" defending the truth?

How are you defending the 'truth' when you say:

His OS expired- because it's not final.

There is no truth in that. It is tales from your ass. Show me where anyone has said this is the reason? They have not. The only fact we have is that he was banned from XBL, and now cannot play offline games. You are making up a reason that makes MS not seem like asshats. It is not a reason they have given. That is why you appear to have an agenda.
 
How are you defending the 'truth' when you say:

There is no truth in that. It is tales from your ass. Show me where anyone has said this is the reason? They have not. The only fact we have is that he was banned from XBL, and now cannot play offline games. You are making up a reason that makes MS not seem like asshats. It is not a reason they have given. That is why you appear to have an agenda.

Is it though?

We still have two more weeks before launch - the console is in a pre-release state. We are doing regular updates - I personally took one a few minutes before he posted. His build is now old. This is why we were saying we didn't want people on early - it's not done yet.

This behavior is only because we are in pre-release. When we launch, console will work exactly as you expect today on 360.

That implies the guy has an old OS and that's the reason why he is unable to play any games...

Of course it's open to interpretation, so feel free to interpret as you see fit. If you feel it's a tales from an ass excuse, that's more than fair, but that's the only 'legit' info we have to go on and that's what peterboy is referencing. So I'm not sure your post was particularly justified in its claims.
 

Tsundere

Banned
That implies the guy has an old OS and that's the reason why he is unable to play any games...

Of course it's open to interpretation, so feel free to interpret as you see fit. If you feel it's a tales from an ass excuse, that's more than fair, but that's the only 'legit' info we have to go on and that's what peterboy is referencing. So I'm not sure your post was particularly justified in its claims.
It's not open to interpretation because all-knowing Penello also says:
Albert Penello said:
For sure this has nothing to do with requiring a connection. There is no "DRM removal" in the Day One update because none of the consoles were ever built with that stuff in it.
That there is no DRM. There is no reason why offline play is not working.
 

PBY

Banned
How are you defending the 'truth' when you say:



There is no truth in that. It is tales from your ass. Show me where anyone has said this is the reason? They have not. The only fact we have is that he was banned from XBL, and now cannot play offline games. You are making up a reason that makes MS not seem like asshats. It is not a reason they have given. That is why you appear to have an agenda.

Its what Penello- really the only solid source of info we have on this subject- said. A software dev came in the thread and said this stuff is typical. You can ignore that, and believe what you want, but I choose to stay away from the conspiracy talk. I'm not a MS apologist- in fact, I've said its really dumb to ship a brick in the way they did- but I'm not gonna follow you down the conspiracy path that many have thrown out in this thread.
 

teiresias

Member
I'm glad we were able to get a glimpse into the future that we as gamers "just weren't ready for." Really cements how little MS thinks of the gamers that made their brand what it is.
 

operon

Member
How are you defending the 'truth' when you say:



There is no truth in that. It is tales from your ass. Show me where anyone has said this is the reason? They have not. The only fact we have is that he was banned from XBL, and now cannot play offline games. You are making up a reason that makes MS not seem like asshats. It is not a reason they have given. That is why you appear to have an agenda.

It's quit clear who has the agenda here in this thread and it's you. We need a mod in here, this throwing around accusations of astroturfing and shills seems to be a way of discounting someone opinions without having to justify why your ignoring it.
 
It's not open to interpretation because all-knowing Penello also says:

That there is no DRM. There is no reason why offline play is not working.

DRM has nothing to do with it. The system, in its pre-release state, could be set to check for updates regularly. If the owner has been banned from accessing XBL, the console can't connect to download the new update and in failing to connect would cease to function. Hence why he can't even apparently check the settings menu.

It's not a particularly difficult concept to grasp...
 

Tsundere

Banned
Considering Penello's track record, well have to wait for more news from insiders and/or CBoat to confirm what's going on.

Even Penello admits he doesn't know - "what I believe".
 

JaggedSac

Member
No, It was never, ever used. In any situation. This is actually a case of it being used, and you say nothing to see here?

This is the very first time, ever, a system ban has blocked a user from playing offline, in the history of consoles. That is massive. That is not nothing. I disregard the first sentence of your post, because it is unfounded nonsense, you cannot backup in any way.

The system still has the pre-180 drm still on it. Which means that the system has to connect to Live to function, which means that offline play is gone if you cannot log in. But that drm is gone. Once the day one patch strips that, your concerns are gone.

Edit: well, guess I should read the informative posts in the thread before attempting to contribute. The DRM is not on retail boxes apparently.
 

PBY

Banned
The system still has the pre-180 drm still on it. Which means that the system has to connect to Live to function, which means that offline play is gone if you cannot log in. But that drm is gone. Once the day one patch strips that, your concerns are gone.

This is all FUD. Since June, it was confirmed that DRM wasn't on the system at all. The day 1 patch doesn't remove DRM, its just the OS.
 
So much confusion and distrust and so many vague and misleading statements...

Hell, we even have still unfulfilled prophesies.

What a crazy fucking launch.
 
This is all FUD. Since June, it was confirmed that DRM wasn't on the system at all. The day 1 patch doesn't remove DRM, its just the OS.

Fud is what MS has been spinning since day one (1). Penellos latest response is rife with it. It isn't conspiracy theory talk either. Of course that is how you try to downplay an inconvenient fact. You paint the purveyors as conspiracy theorists until they are laughed at and then your problem is solved. Nice try Redmond apoligists.

To those that want to paint it thus you yourselves are being used and you are too naive to realize the truth. And what is that truth you ask? Simple really. When an explanation, in this case Penellios's doesn't pass the smell test a.k.a. the common sense test, then there is an issue afoot. It isn't that the MS response does not answer some twisted convoluted question but rather that it fails to fit into the structure of simple common sense. Voltaire was apparently correct.

When a company jumps from one explanation to another, backpeddling, well...run from them like hell.

Laugh at Parakeetman all you will but once you eliminate the impossible...well...you know the quote.
 
Top Bottom