Claude Augario
Member
I'm not fighting for anything. I'm strictly talking about this article. I already said what the cop did was wrong. That's the first thing I said in my first post in this thread. I also only mentioned what the driver did wasn't right either. But I guess I was wrong for doing that. You guys only want to read the things you don't agree with. I'm out of this thread.
"He was no angel," "both sides are bad," and "I said something wholly ridiculous, lemme bail out before I take the heat!" Aren't you original.
I'm going to steal from Quinn Mallory for a bit and take you on a slide to an alternate reality. We are now in another reality and David Washington has just had a medical emergency that resulted in an accident. The police have arrived and have cussed him out, tried (and failed) to tase him, and have practically baptized him in pepper spray before throwing his unresponsive body to the ground and allowing his own car to run over his foot. The only difference in this reality is that his license is not revoked!
Or basically everything you're saying doesn't mean shit because the horrific turn of events were completely unrelated to the status of his license and focusing on that is basically another version of, "that thug had it coming." You can swear up and down that what the police did was wrong but if you have to follow that up in any shape or form with "[victim] shouldn't have done [unrelated thing]" then you are victim blaming and weaving a false narrative.
I've been lurking long enough to know how these threads play out.