Yeah, let's make endearing references to a company who refused to fund our game...
you people know what this means...
Nintendo references are a go?
Yeah, let's make endearing references to a company who refused to fund our game...
because the franchise was already migrating to sony's console,and probably because EA,big as it is,made a really good offer .
plus mass effect one already sold everything he had to sold already when the mass effect 1 came to ps3
so why can't same happen to bayonetta 2 down the road?
Which is the point I replied to. that is is not impossible like many claim because it has been done before.
Realistic expectation is it won't come for a long time if ever. but it can
Why you guys worry about this? Bayonetta 2 is exclusive. Bayonetta 3 is not.
-but then again I have a feeling that the game will bomb and franchise ending up dead-
Because EA wasn't broke and Sega is?
EA didn't buy anything from MS.
A publisher gets the rights to publish something that is not their own creation in a specific context. eg, MS and Mass Effect (A bioware and then EA IP) on the 360.
The only case in which EA would have had to buy anything from MS is if they wanted to republish the game on the 360 themselves. That's it.
It's just like stuff based on books. Someone wanting to make a game based on a book doesn't get the rights to do so from the publisher of a movie adaptation but from the book's author. And the owner of the rights for movie distribution doesn't have anything to say about that game.
Sega isn't broke...
so why can't same happen to bayonetta 2 down the road?
Which is the point I replied to. that is is not impossible like many claim because it has been done before.
Realistic expectation is it won't come for a long time if ever. but it can
so why can't same happen to bayonetta 2 down the road?
Which is the point I replied to. that is is not impossible like many claim because it has been done before.
Realistic expectation is it won't come for a long time if ever. but it can
Sega isn't broke...
Has this thread really devolved into a discussion about whether Bayonetta 2 will go to other platforms 5 years after its release?
People aren't saying it can't. People are saying that its up to Nintendo and since Nintendo is in direct competition with Microsoft/Sony (unlike EA, who's best interest was putting it on multiple platforms and making the maxiumum amount of money.) they probably wont ever let it happen. There's no benefit in Nintendo letting an exclusive game go multiplatform.so why can't same happen to bayonetta 2 down the road?
Which is the point I replied to. that is is not impossible like many claim because it has been done before.
Realistic expectation is it won't come for a long time if ever. but it can
it works the other way too.
the author of the book doesn't have control over the film that was made using the rights he sold.marvel doesn't have control over the avengers movie,Rowling doesn't have control over all the harry potter's film.
at the same time,SEga doesn't have control over the game nintendo made using his franchise,they just get paid for it,like it always happen.
It was published by EA. Bayonetta 2 is published by Nintendo IIRC. It is similar to demanding Halo Reach going to Sony and Nintendo. Why can't they? After all Bungie is 'Third Party' now.
Yes, Sega doesn't have any control on Bayonetta 2 on the WiiU. Unless they buy the publishing rights from Nintendo.
Again, unless there was an explicit absolute exclusivity deal in their contract, there is nothing preventing Sega to ask Platinum or any other dev to port Bayo 2 to any platform they please except the WiiU.
Bayonetta 2 is lucky to exist and people are already expecting a third one?
That's kind of illogical. Sega must be getting something out of this deal. At the very least, it's just license fees for using the Bayonetta name, at the most it's complete reversion of all publishing rights after an exclusive period. It could be either, or more likely something in the middle.Its not like Mass Effect because those games were going to get made anyway, this game literally wouldn't have been made if not for Nintendo and it doesn't make any sense that Sega will all of the sudden find it profitable to pay off Nintendo so they can put it out on consoles it already cancelled the game on.
Bayonetta 2 is lucky to exist and people are already expecting a third one?
Actually Sammy might have a word to say about that
These people should watch Mitsudomoe and get back to me.Hey man, They made one, then a few years later they make a new one. Following this trend, it's inevitable!
What? That's not what I was saying at all. It just doesn't make sense that Sega would decide to not make Bayo 2 for 360/PS3 because they didn't think it would sell enough, and then would pay Nintendo to let them port it over (and pay the costs to port it) to the systems they didn't think it would sell on.That's kind of illogical. Sega must be getting something out of this deal. At the very least, it's just license fees for using the Bayonetta name, at the most it's complete reversion of all publishing rights after an exclusive period. It could be either, or more likely something in the middle.
Sega don't give a shit that Bayo 2 was cancelled, they're not a charity, they don't give up a partially built game because it's for the good of the gaming community.
Well they can ask themselves if they want to do it yeah. That'd be entertaining to watch.
Yep. People want games that you don't like. How dare they think different. I bet they don't even buy Apple products and yet live life by that slogan. I for one bought Wii Music. I bet you hate me for that.Wait, people actually want these games?
Did Bayonetta really not sell that well?
I thought the sales figures were decent.
Exactly, my point was for all we know, the reason Nintendo are allowed to have Platinum finish the game is in return of having the finished game available to Sega to publish at a later date.What? That's not what I was saying at all. It just doesn't make sense that Sega would decide to not make Bayo 2 for 360/PS3 because they didn't think it would sell enough, and then would pay Nintendo to let them port it over (and pay the costs to port it) to the systems they didn't think it would sell on.
Wait, people actually want these games?
They're so rolling in the cash that they stopped developping all games not Sonic/Football Manager/few others.
Even the minimal work to make a port work is probably not something Sega would deem worth the effort.
They're not broke but they were hemorrhaging money like a motherfucker, hence why they ditched Bayonetta 2, delayed Anarchy Reigns, cancelled a bunch of titles and refocused all packaged titles on main franchises while restructuring and going more digital.
Whatever money they get from Bayonetta 2 probably won't be much either since it's only IP/copyright stuff, but their input on that is minimal enough that it's rather risk free I presume. I doubt they'd get much from undertaking their own post-launch remake due to the whole "post-launch ports don't get much" mentality and Sega probably not banking much on advertising.
Wait, people actually want these games?
Wait, people actually want these games?
Thanks for the interesting PS360 news!
Oh I'm not one of the ones saying it will never be multi platform. I'm just saying its up to Nintendo and that it doesn't make sense for how Bayo 2's development has gone for Sega to even want to bother putting it on 360/PS3. They'd probably have to pay Nintendo and then pay the costs to port it to PS3/360, which are on their way out.Exactly, my point was for all we know, the reason Nintendo are allowed to have Platinum finish the game is in return of having the finished game available to Sega to publish at a later date.
Why is that? Not that Bayonetta was some huge diversion for the genre, but it's possible it'd be more your cup of tea than other entries.well I'll be buying w-101 with my wii U, not sure about bayo as I've never been a fan of the genre
Wait, people actually want these games?
Wait, people actually want these games?
Wait, people actually want these games?
People are fucking dumb if they can't realize Nintendo is paying for the development of these games and publishing them. W101 is probably a Nintendo IP. I honestly hope the games do well and Nintendo picks up a big share in Platinum and we see more collaborations between them. I love the idea of Platinum doing games like Vanquish, MadWorld, Anarchy Reigns, and Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance, but the idea of Platinum games working with Nintendo properties or bringing those to Nintendo platforms with the Nintendo development cycle (the money and time Platinum games has clearly been lacking with ALL their releases thus far), it would benefit both greatly.
Platinum Games is one of the few Japanese studios that "get it". And "getting it" is priceless.
From the sound of it, they don't have control over Bayonetta 2 in general. If they did a "Bayonetta 2: Climax/Sigma/Razor's Edge Edition they would have to do that on their own dime from the ground up, which probably won't happen because it they would have just published Bayonetta 2 in the first place.Yes, Sega doesn't have any control on Bayonetta 2 on the WiiU. Unless they buy the publishing rights from Nintendo.
Again, unless there was an explicit absolute exclusivity deal in their contract, there is nothing preventing Sega to ask Platinum or any other dev to port Bayo 2 to any platform they please except the WiiU.
Yes, Sega doesn't have any control on Bayonetta 2 on the WiiU. Unless they buy the publishing rights from Nintendo.
Again, unless there was an explicit absolute exclusivity deal in their contract, there is nothing preventing Sega to ask Platinum or any other dev to port Bayo 2 to any platform they please except the WiiU.
Because the Halo IP belongs to Microsoft Studios.
Why is that? Not that Bayonetta was some huge diversion for the genre, but it's possible it'd be more your cup of tea than other entries.
Also, W101 looks pretty similar to Bayonetta really, it's still a 'character action game', just in very unorthodox packaging.