First time hearing about 'It' (2017). What? Why? There are still many good King novels that haven't been adapted.
Why not? IT is one of Kings best and has not been properly adapted to screen yet (the TV version is bad aside from Tim Curry).
First time hearing about 'It' (2017). What? Why? There are still many good King novels that haven't been adapted.
I don't want a flawless book adaption. There is a lot of things that probably don't belong in an adaption, not just THAT scene. However hopefully it's closer.And for those of you wanting a flawless book adaptation, think back to everything that happened in that book and ask yourself...is that really what you want to see?
Looks like Jerome from Gotham.
It's been decades since I read it, but I remember not being able to put it down.
The Stand is another monstrosity of a book that was hard to put down.
Read them when I could read all day after school (and sometimes during school), when there was no internet and video games could wait.
I read it fairly recently, the opening chapter is very gripping. There was a bit of a lull after that but once it introduced the core cast of characters I was hooked till the end and didn't want it to be over. Probably the best-paced book of that length I've ever read.
While I'm not a big fan of the design either, "ancient horror" is exactly what the creature called Pennywise actually is
Is this part of the DC universe? It's so dark and gray.
That scene where Pennywise was under the storm drain gave me fucking nightmares when I was a kid.... and it came from a made for TV movie from 1990 too... The movie itself wasn't particularly scary or anything. But that one scene...
And yes I agree, just making Pennywise look like a regular clown is scary enough in itself.
Also, why do movie studios keep using Entertainment for their publicity stills? Entertainment constantly provides some of the worst looking publicity shots that I have ever seen. Their photoshop artist is laughably bad.
The "Georgie Scene" is pure Tim Curry magic. There's a split second after Pennywise responds, "Oh yes. They float, Georgie!" where he lets slip a half second sinister grin before continuing to speak. It's like he can't hide his glee that he's about to feed.
It's at 1:35 in this recording. https://youtu.be/E8ATL5NHyjw?list=FLp3zlU9DUYfsjzCFHCmNGcw
Even as a kid that look, that look that lasted a microsecond, had a real sinister perversion to it. Like Pennywise had some weird stake greater than just evil in this game. Something almost sexual.
Curry is so amazing in everything. Fucking Clue for life, guys.
First photo of "The Loser's Club" from the new film:
Looks better than the Pennywise reveal IMO at least. Still not very optimistic.
First photo of "The Loser's Club" from the new film:
Looks better than the Pennywise reveal IMO at least. Still not very optimistic.
This. looks exactly like itSeems more fitting for a Killer Klowns from Outer Space remake.
Beverly looks too good looking to be hanging out with the rest of them.
Weird.
Weird.
You can be good looking and a social outcast soThey're supposed to be the social outcasts and you have a girl looking like a model in the corner. Yes it looks out of place.
First photo of "The Loser's Club" from the new film:
Looks better than the Pennywise reveal IMO at least. Still not very optimistic.
I agree that this is creepier than the "Private Pyle" faced approach we seem to be getting. Bozo too.
Trying to keep an open mind, though...
Same here, I'm thinking it was just for the publicity shot.
I do wish they they would have kept the original director and pennywise, it could have been something special. At least on the visual department.
You can be good looking and a social outcast so
Beverly looks too good looking to be hanging out with the rest of them.
Unless I'm misremembering, she didn't have any of the social issues the other kids had like Billy's stutter or Eddie's asthma.
Same here, I'm thinking it was just for the publicity shot.
I do wish they they would have kept the original director and pennywise, it could have been something special. At least on the visual department.
Unless I'm misremembering, she didn't have any of the social issues the other kids had like Billy's stutter or Eddie's asthma.
Beverly looks too good looking to be hanging out with the rest of them.
Well that's not necessarily a social issue for kids unless she was coming to school with black eyes.Yes, she did. It's called an abusive deadbeat father.
Beverly was pretty damaged from what I remember, she is not part of the losers club because she is ugly.
Well that's not necessarily a social issue for kids unless she was coming to school with black eyes.
I don't think she was neurotic or anything from the abuse. She was sexually harassed by Henry but I think she was already hanging out with the Loser's Club at that point.
Beverly in the book was not average, as a kid she was quite attractive and grew into stunning model beauty. Her issue was a abusive dad bordering on sexual perversion and abuse based on her growing up and because of that her trying to downplay her looks because of the unwanted attention from men especially her father.They're supposed to be the social outcasts and you have a girl looking like a model in the corner. Yes it looks out of place.
The TV version of Beverly looked much more like an average girl.
Alright fine, I'll take back the complaint. I didn't remember anything from the books praising her looks until she's an adult so I thought the TV miniseries matched the book description of her as a kid. For reference:Beverly in the book was not average, as a kid she was quite attractive and grew into stunning model beauty. Her issue was a abusive dad bordering on sexual perversion and abuse based on her growing up and because of that her trying to downplay her looks because of the unwanted attention from men especially her father.
Add in some tomboyish qualitys and poverty making sure she was wearing hand me downs that were years out of style.
Again the TV miniseries was a shitty adaption and should not be what this new effort is judged on, it should be allowed to sink or swim on its own.
And crappy Pennywise EW publicity still aside every other piece of info seems a lot more accurate to the book.
Just weird until they have a weird, ritualistic gangbang in a sewer.
Yeah I really wish they didn't fuck up the original plan. the actor that Fukunaga picked (Will Poulter) for Pennywise would have been damn near perfect. Seriously reminded me of a young Tim Curry for some reason.
Speaking of Fukunaga, anyone know what he's up too? IMDB doesn't show him involved with anything as far as direction goes, at least from what I'm seeing.
King was off his face on coke and prescription drugs during that period, it probably made perfect sense to him. The craziest book from that era is The Tommyknockers, knowing he was in a drug addled state helps explain a lot when you're reading that one.lol...that scene is so fucking ridiculous. It could've just been something like a kiss -- which is weird still. But nope, gangbang all the way.
I thought she was abused by her dad. I can't quite remember if molestation (witch might tie in with what happens in the sewers) was implied, maybe not, and then abused by her husband later on.
Yeah in the book her issues were all about her budding body and attention from men and that is what IT attacks her with more than once including at one point "possessing" her father and trying to rape her.Alright fine, I'll take back the complaint. I didn't remember anything from the books praising her looks until she's an adult so I thought the TV miniseries matched the book description of her as a kid. For reference:
He's got a bunch of shit in production. I hope something starts filming soon before he becomes one of those guys who signs up for a bunch of interesting shit that doesn't come to fruition
Netflix miniseries with Jonah hill and Emma stone
Reviving Kubricks napoleon project for HBO
Yeah in the book her issues were all about her budding body and attention from men and that is what IT attacks her with more than once including at one point "possessing" her father and trying to rape her.
My bigger issue though and it's not directed at you in particular is that people need to stop comparing it to a pretty crappy adaption that only gets remembered because of Tim Curry's performance. I actually wish the word remake would stop getting used, it's only a remake in the way Carpenter's thing is a remake, as in its the same source material.
I'm not saying it will be good, or defending it in anticipation of it being good, it could end up being a steaming pile of shit, but if it is it will be its own steaming pile of shit completely unrelated to the first adaption.
Ah sweet! Damn both of those projects sound good to me. I need some more of this dudes work in my life stat!!!