Few things:
I don't understand why so many of you are all warm and cuddly for the EU? Its fundamentally un-democratic and is completely dysfunctional.
Just like the House of Lords.
Scotland would probably be forced to adopt the Euro. Really guys, you want to do that? Really. Well what ever floats your boat. The Euro is fundamentally FUBAR'd, keeping it going is going to be a major headache for years, its not even clear that the Euro can ultimately be saved.
Yes. It's looking a sight better safer bet than Sterling right now
Mortgages are in Pounds Sterling, lenders have no obligation to switch over to Euros. Could be fun.
Exchange rates on credit products are not expensive. Lenders would roll into the interest rate, which already happens with other charges anyway.
Scotland has no power to call a referendum. They can call a fake one, but its fake, so would simply put pressure on UK to allow self determination. Given that leaving EU is going to be a stupendous amount of work, I can't see UK Gov being too keen on IndyRef2 any time soon.
Don't need it. Indyref 1 was pomp and circumstance. I think the same will happen again but let's say it doesn't...the rest of the UK cannot stop us leaving. What would they do? Throw our whole country in jail?
The resounding backing Scotland gave the EU today is plain to see. The EU can see that and will recognise it. It's in the EUs interests to have as many willing, able and diverse members as possible.
We don't need Westminster's permission to remedy a fallacy that was promoted by HM Government in 2014, that being, that a yes vote would lead to loss of EU membership.
SNP has no mandate for IndyRef2. Yep they could ask the Greens to help them get legislation through Scottish parliament, but that's not quite the same thing.
'not quite the same thing'...?
An MSPs vote is worth the same as another MSPs vote be they SNP, Green, Labour, Conservative or whatever.
General Election 2015 after a no vote...56 out of 59 seats.
Scottish Parliamentary Elections 2016...two seats short of a majority (a consequence of the proportional list system)
But crucially... an INCREASE in the share of the vote.
2011 - 876,421 regional, 902,915 constituency votes.
2016 - 953,587 regional, 1,059,897 constituency votes.
Despite the no vote, MORE people voted SNP and the conditions laid down in the manifesto for considering a new referendum have been met.
To suggest that the SNP has no mandate is therefore #1) Factually incorrect as explained above and #2) Entirely disrespectful to those voters.
You don't decide if the SNP has such a mandate. I don't decide. The SNP doesn't decide.
The ELECTORATE decides. And they have decided.
An independent Scotland would be immediately insolvent as it currently operates. North Sea oil is never coming back as it was--fracking has seen to that--so there will no longer be that Resources cushion. Sure, Scotland could still be independent and a great nation, it would just require a substantial tightening of the belt, you all up for that? Have a real hard think about what that would actually mean.
My own personal determination puts little stock in oil. We can be self sufficient without it. We're already on our way there for energy generation.
Regarding tightening of belts...we're used to it. Continually being cropped on by a Westminster government we didn't vote for.
We deserve to be able to make our own path, rather than being told we can't because they think we're not up to it.
At this moment in time Nicola Sturgeon is throwing her toys out of the pram. If you all feel the same in 6 or 7 years time then your chance will come again. However by then you will all have chilled out a bit, and I'm guessing the economic realities will then prevail. And as for joining the EU, I reckon that institution will look even less attractive by then.
I'm a patient person. Next year, 5 years, 10 years...an independent Scotland is going to happen. Now with the UK on its way out of the EU, the sooner we leave the better and the less damage can be done to us by a right learning, Euro skeptic Westminster.