One thing probably glossed a fair bit over in Sturgeon's excellent speech due to the 2nd ref question is her astute observations as to why England voted to leave the EU:-
But this vote wasn't just about the EU - it was also a clear expression of the disaffection with the political system that is felt in too many communities.
Communities taken for granted by Labour for generations and punished with austerity cuts by the Tories for a financial crisis they didn't cause, used this referendum to make their voices heard.
I don't think that all the folks in England that voted to leave are necessarily bigots and xenophobes, but instead as Sturgeon has noted, they saw a chance to affect change (even if that change is counter to their interests) and took it. Maybe it is patronising to call this a protest vote as oppose to looking at the key question of the EU, but the alternative is a bleak thought indeed.
As a Scot who has at least seen devolution and a Scottish Parliament form, I can say I have seen progress of a form, what has England outside London seen for the last 20 years? An inept Labour and almost a total feeling of being unrepresented and dissatisfaction, that has been growing and growing.
What I really don't get is why people in England, specially the traditional Labour heartlands like the North and Midlans think that Boris, Gove and Co are going to have their interests at heart moving forward. The Tory right-wing does not have the best interests of the rest of England at heart IMO.