Mihael Mello Keehl
Banned
The temple of time againWhy are you so sure QOL will flop?
The temple of time againWhy are you so sure QOL will flop?
On a system starved for content, if the quality is high, a proper marketing push could make it a strong seller.
I don't know her.Don't forget Bayonetta 2. The first did pretty well, didn't it? Not a huge hit, but a good seller.
True, but I think it will be bigger than most expect, especially in terms of pushing hardware. Something similar to what MH3U did.X won't make much of an impact.
Realistic forecasts, I can actually see Wii U selling more than expected!
Smash, Kart, X will be a good punch.
Again, I think it's possible, but Nintendo isn't going to let it happen. The successor will be out next year, IMO as early as February, and the 3DS will be killed off shortly after.So another 30 million in sales left in your estimation?
Barely sold a million on hundred million PS360 consoles, let's see how much it'll sell on 6 million WiiUs.Don't forget Bayonetta 2. The first did pretty well, didn't it? Not a huge hit, but a good seller.
R&D money wasted on the QOL debacle. Awesome. Iwata would have been better off blowing it all on coke and hookers.
It's not clear to me to what extent they impaired Inventory if it was that small a loss. Wouldn't they need to explicitly disclose a significant impairment?Oh, didn't see the supplemental note. They're still holding a crapload of inventory though. :S
The impairment should have been charged to cost of sales, but gross margin increased? I guess it's from the increase in software sales. I think they report the amount in their annual report whenever that comes out.
Mariokart won't move the needle in any direction, just like NSMB U didn't despite that insane attach rate.
Better than Xenoblade, at least.Define strong seller quantitatively. How much do you think it will sell?
On a system starved for content, if the quality is high, a proper marketing push could make it a strong seller.
Why are you so sure QOL will flop?
Better than Xenoblade, at least.
We don't know where the R&D money went, we don't know what the QoL platform is, and the money they spent on Yamauchi's shares isn't gone because they can sell the shares again.
I can't find it anymore. I remember it was posted on GAF a few months ago, but it was a short off-topic discussion in some huge thread.That sounds interesting, i would like to read this if you could provide a link please.
Then he needs to grab his balls and say "I'm the CEO and I know what's best for this company" and not listen to the same kind of investor that wants Nintendo to go mobile.He's not canned because he's still probably the most successful manager in the industry overall. He's also not solely responsible for everything that goes wrong. I believe there even was a Nikkei article a while ago claiming that Wii U wasn't really what Iwata wanted, it's what some members of the board wanted. If true, that failure would potentially strengthen Iwata's position internally.
Let's be honest, even without knowing much about it there's a decent chance it probably will.
The thing is, that market has yet to find it's "iPhone". All the current products in the market have failed to hit the potential highs that people see in the market.Common sense. Look at the market that already exists for QOL tech, take a look at what's coming, and add to that Apple, Google, Samsung, and everyone else coming into this space in a big way. I don't trust Nintendo hardware designers to be able to compete on this level, and I don't trust Iwata to sign off on the right product and strategy.
Iwata is steering his storm battered ship straight into the Bermuda Triangle.
The Wii was like a hall of fame basketball player. The Wii U is the son of that hall of famer that isn't nowhere near as good as his father and barely makes it off the bench and is only employed in the nba because of who their father was.
Just let it go Nintendo. Let the Wii U go. Shift over all development to PC close to benchmarks of the next console you want and only release what's left for Wii U (Zelda, Smash, Bayonetta 2, X, MK8) and then port over Zelda as a launch title for the new console.
It should be noted that the large operating loss and overall net loss is largely due to some one-time injections they had in Q4.
Remember, they added 15bn yen into R&D and 8bn yen into Marketing. That essentially covers their entire net loss and the increase in Operating Loss.
If you compare Q1 through Q3 for the last few years, there's clear improvement.
Nintendo deserves to do better IMO.
Or more and more, depending on the success of future Nintendo products.Surely those shares a becoming worth less and less all the time now though?
I "dodged" because I'm lacking data. I don't know when it launches, what kind of marketing push it gets, and where the Wii U will be when it launches.I asked you a question and dodged it. Selling better than Xenoblade is not a big feat and in no one's books dictates a strong seller other than your warped definition.
Divine Retribution for making the gamepad not support multitouch and thus be bad at rhythm gaming. No snakesalute for you nintendo ( ̄へ ̄)
Wii U is where the bottom of the hill begins.Wii U is not going downhill, is almost at the bottom
They need an ultra basic pack with just the Pro Controller @ £129, I'm desperate to play some of the titles out already but I'm not paying the price of admission for how basic the hardware is.
I had to quote this because it sums up my thoughts as well. The 3DS as well is poor bang for buck sharing parts used by the Nokia Asha phones designed for third world countries.I really feel like Nintendo needs to simplify and streamline
Just look at the WiiU. Its a convoluted mess with no less than 4 cords popping from it. Supports several peripherals that all need batteries.... all of which drain them relatively quickly.
A serious lack of Commitment to provided a Smooth user experience, lack of unified content access, mountains of slow menus, Poorly implemented storage setup.
Im just hitting the tip of the iceberg. Of all of the systems it provides the SMALLEST bang for your buck which is counter-intuitive considering its backwards compatibility (which is totally botched and half assed)
The design philosophy of their entire ecosystem is over complicated and BROKEN and thats not just the WiiU but the Nintendo network and content distribution as a WHOLE.
End of story.
Yes it did. The WiiU had a good launch.
They weren't able to follow up on it in any way - with months of software drought, but the launch with NSMB U wasn't that bad.
What I find upsetting about their Wii-U sales forecast is that it tells me that there probably won't be any drastic price cuts :-(
I always end up owning every Nintendo system but only when they reach what I consider a fair price and the Wii-U is far from that atm imo.
They need ultra basic pack with just the Pro Controller @ £129, I'm desperate to play some of the titles out already but I'm not paying the price of admission for old basic the hardware is.
Which is exactly why I expect it to push hardware, it's an unexplored audience on Wii U.X would be a huge AAA title on X1 and PS4, but on Wii U? It's not really aimed at the Wii U audience as it lacks a family-oriented art and gameplay style and as it does not feature Mario either.
What I find upsetting about their Wii-U sales forecast is that it tells me that there probably won't be any drastic price cuts :-(
I always end up owning every Nintendo system but only when they reach what I consider a fair price and the Wii-U is far from that atm imo.
They need ultra basic pack with just the Pro Controller @ £129, I'm desperate to play some of the titles out already but I'm not paying the price of admission for old basic the hardware is.
I "dodged" because I'm lacking data. I don't know when it launches, what kind of marketing push it gets, and where the Wii U will be when it launches.
The thing is, that market has yet to find it's "iPhone". All the current products in the market have failed to hit the potential highs that people see in the market.
We don't know what Nintendo is making, but we know it's hitting that market from a new angle, so I think we should at least wait and see what they offer before writing them off.
Read the post again. I said release all those games for Wii U but also make a new console version of Zelda (such as Twilight Princess for GameCube and Wii).Yep killing off the console that early that it doesn't even see the zelda thats already in development will sure do wonders for its image to the fans that bought the wii u.
Barely sold a million on hundred million PS360 consoles, let's see how much it'll sell on 6 million WiiUs.
Apple's entering the same industry soon, they've got iwatches planned out this year that can do all the QoL things that every other company has been carving out right now in the market. Remember that Apple does not enter a new market unless they are 100% sure they have a winning formula. There's no doubt that even with the worst projections, due to Apple's popularity through the world. They will no doubt be the "iphone" of the industry and carve out a huge chunk.
I never said it WILL be a strong seller, I said it COULD be.So then how can you claim it will be a strong seller?
We don't know what the QoL platform is. QoL means nothing in itself. It could be anything. It doesn't matter what Apple, Google or Samsung do, because there's no way to tell if what Nintendo plans to do is even remotely similar. It could be AAL. Apple doesn't do AAL, Google is researching AAL but doesn't have any products, Samsung might or might not be working on AAL. And even AAL itself is a huge and diverse market with many completely different products, including home automation, communication, surveillance, digital assistants, robotics and a billion other things.Common sense. Look at the market that already exists for QOL tech, take a look at what's coming, and add to that Apple, Google, Samsung, and everyone else coming into this space in a big way. I don't trust Nintendo hardware designers to be able to compete on this level, and I don't trust Iwata to sign off on the right product and strategy.
Iwata is steering his storm battered ship straight into the Bermuda Triangle.
But you can claim it isnt. Lol hypocrisy to the MAX..So then how can you claim it will be a strong seller? How does one reach that conclusion? MK, 3D world, Smash are strong sellers. Zelda may also be a strong seller. X is not.
Lets say it comes out in Q1 2015. Lets say Nintendo meets projections so there are 9 million wiiu's.
I can't find it anymore. I remember it was posted on GAF a few months ago, but it was a short off-topic discussion in some huge thread.
I'm fairly optimistic Nintendo can recover from this and WiiU will surpass its projected sales from what I hear at gamestop's, conventions and the like a lot of people are holding on buying a WiiU until smash bros and a proper Zelda and I imagine many will see Mario kart 8 as the jumping on point, I'm not saying WiiU will become a huge success and become a contender, that ship has sailed I do think things will pick up though
Yeah, it's hard to tell. I think we were estimating something like 6M Wii Us in inventory.It's not clear to me to what extent they impaired Inventory if it was that small a loss. Wouldn't they need to explicitly disclose a significant impairment?
What exactly are you saying is being ignored? The company would still be operating at a loss without those increased expenses. Those expenses may have been necessary to simply achieve the sales they have achieved.This will probably go ignored, even by news sites.
Thanks! Will be an interesting weekend with an bunch of "Nintendo is doomed" threads.