......HDMI>>>>>>>>>>>≥>>>Optical
If you still rely on optical out then you don't have a "quality 5.1 setup," sorry. It's time to upgrade. It's been time to upgrade since about 2012.
So... Nintendo is going to increase costs because a few people are going to use that.... make sense.. :/With Astro mix amp and quality head phones
Optical>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hdmi
I guess most here just assumes that you'll have this system hooked up to a TV.
As someone who games exclusively on a monitor and with headphones, this just makes the Switch far less appealing to me. I had to sacrifice the surround sound for my headphones to play the Wii U, but at least I could actually hear the system through the composite. With the Switch, It's going to be a big headache trying to figure out how much I need to spend and what I'll need to purchase to make my set up work.
With Astro mix amp and quality head phones
Optical>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hdmi
I don't see this as a huge deal because the Wii U already dropped it, but's it's amazing how people in threads like this constantly say "it's way out of date", "get a new receiver" when high-end gaming headsets sold on shelves today (like Astro A40s and A50s etc) use optical today, yes, in 2017. So there are valid reasons for the port to exist, not just 10 year old receivers.
So... Nintendo is going to increase costs because a few people are going to use that.... make sense.. :/
That makes your A/V receiver anywhere from 12 to 18 years old, by my reckoning. Is it a super expensive, high quality receiver you're not keen to upgrade on? Newer ones have a lot of other features besides HDMI inputs that are really worthwhile.
Please tell me what is using optical these days. Unless you mean some devices still have a legacy port on there.
As for "premium" headsets, quit wasting your money on that shit and get real headphones + dac
Yeah the writing was on the wall considering the Wii U didn't have optical out.
That being said, I do still use optical out myself (Z-5500s connected to a 4 port HDMI switch with optical out - mine was from Monoprice sold through Amazon but they don't sell it anymore) but HDMI has been the standard for a while. Someone linked an HDMI/optical out converter on Amazon for under $30 and I feel that is the best solution for you.
With Astro mix amp and quality head phones
Optical>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hdmi
That would be considered a legacy port.
Astro Mix amp is junk. iDSD Micro + LCD2/HD800/HE-560 is the true paradiseSome headphone amps, such as Astro mix amp, use optical out.
Its fairly common for gaming. At least Pro has it.
And lol to the people who say this set up is bad. Mmm OK.
Astro mix amp + sennheisser game ONE using optical is gaming paradise.
"Astro mix" + "quality head phones" does not compute. Drop the astro part and it might work.
Astro Mix amp is junk. iDSD Micro + LCD2/HD800/HE-560 is the true paradise
And lose (proper) surround sound in the process? No thanks.Maybe you adults should know that you can just hook it to the tv and then the tv to the reciever and it's a non issue?
To be fair, there are plenty of setups (AVR and speakers) that lack HDMI which would be significantly better than many HDMI capable setups today, lossy bitstream or not, so it's certainly possibly that their "quality" setup is indeed that.There's no such thing as a "quality 5.1 setup" that only supports optical, OP. Optical 5.1 is limited to lossy bitstreams only. Your setup has been obsolete for almost a decade now.
A lot of the mid-late 00s receivers that had HDMI only had 1 or 2 HDMI inputs, along with a couple of optical ins and your typical array of component, composite, etc ports.
I got my Panasonic surround sound system in mid-2009, making it maybe 9 years old by model release, and I think I have 1 HDMI port. Maybe it's 2. I had been using the optical ports for convenience's sake.
Granted, I know my system is super old.
Except it has a 3.5mm jack and the dock has two USB 2.0 ports.
Yep. The very same. It can only support uncompressed 2 channels and low bitrate 5.1.
What mix amp is better than the astro with Sennheisser game ONE's for gaming where directional + mixing your voice matters ?
You are going on about musical DACS ? Games where directional audio is key, competitive COD players still use it, better than anything else ?
Thats not a mic gaming headset and mix amp for your mic + party chat ? Thats musical !
Is there even a single person for whom optical out will make the difference between buying a Switch and not buying a Switch? The OP is mad, sure, but he's apparently the only person on GAF who gives a shit, and even he isn't willing to cancel his preorder.
Safe to say this is a non-issue.
I guess I'm baffled why headphones would use it in 2017 too.
One of the biggest complaints I had heard about both the Wii and Wii U was the lack of an optical audio out port. It is something that stopped myself and from what I have read a lot of others being able to hook up their systems to their 5.1 surround sound systems.
After doing some research today it appears the Switch also doesn't support this feature. I mean seriously Nintendo? Some of us have quality 5.1 setups that don't support HDMI audio and your competition both have this feature. It won't stop my preorder but Nintendo's lack of including features that should be a given are maddening.
My TV only has optical out, no HDMI out. I bought it only about 2 years ago, so it's not old either.
Anyways, I'm not using a 'premium headset' or anything like that, numbnut: I'm using a JVC HA-RX700 with a FiiO E17. It's nice, because I live in a studio with central air, and when the AC kicks in I can't hear anything without headphones.
I'm not totally sure why everyone seems to hate Optical. Yes, HDMI can carry slightly better audio signals, but for many cases optical works just as well. The thing about optical is that the cords and connectors are a bit smaller than HDMI, so it can be useful if you don't need a full HDMI cable if you're not dealing with video. On top of that, HDMI is powered. Optical is not. You don't have deal with ground loops or electrical noise with Optical cables, and it's a simpler connector, so it's nice from a design perspective. Of course, those are mild advantages, but there's a reason why optical has been slow to disappear; there's not a great reason to migrate in mass.
Plus, many devices don't let you separate video and audio on two different HDMI cables. The PS3, and my TV doesn't. I suppose I could just buy a really expensive receiver to do this, but quite frankly just outputting to digital audio is much easier if available.
I know you really like HDMI out there, but whether you like it or not, the audio world still uses optical, so stop yelling at the OP for things outside of his control.
Exactly. Between this and the lack of a coax port, I don't know how there's not a full-scale boycott of the Switch.
My Astro Mixamp needs optical in to enable the surround sound, I have no idea what is "the standard" in audio but I appreciate when it is an option.
who uses optical audio nowadays?
Thanks, I think I'm going to have to buy one of those splitters you linked. It's kinda tedious physically changing over the optical cable when I want to switch consoles (I just have cables hooked up already and I just change whichever one actually goes to the amp now)
Astro has a page dedicated now for the PS4 Slim since it does not have an optical port. http://blog.astrogaming.com/2016/09/astro-ps4-slim/
Maybe they should just start including these splitters in the box now...
hrm..i have an optical audio external sound processor for dolby 7.1...my motherboard came with optical audio built in, so I guess lots of people?
people not trying to shave coins off for cost versus performance?
Not Nintendo?