But in Texas, delegates are allocated differently. I know you're always looking for ways for Clinton to win, but I don't think that particular one is realistic--unless you're expecting 50% Hispanic turnout, which would be grossly disproportionate to their actual presence in Texas.Cheebs said:Here is something to remember:
In California in 2004 hispanic turnout was 16% of the primary electorate. In 2008 it was 30%.
Texas polling is using 2004 % to project what the primary will look like.
I am talking about popular vote win, not delegate. Headline will be the popular vote win.Sharp said:But in Texas, delegates are allocated differently. I know you're always looking for ways for Clinton to win, but I don't think that particular one is realistic--unless you're expecting 50% Hispanic turnout, which would be grossly disproportionate to their actual presence in Texas.
What a vile, disgusting person she is turning out to be. And to think I was ambivalent towards her before this primary season.thefro said:
Triumph said:You're a lolbertarian tho, rite? Srsly, you guys are like maybe 3% of America. All of you should move into Wyoming and turn it into a shithole and leave us alone.
shit I'm missing something here, someone help me out.thefro said:
cashman said:shit I'm missing something here, someone help me out.
"I'll take his word on it that he's not a Muslim" as a response instead of "Whether he's a Muslim, a Christian, a Jew, an Atheist, or a follower of any other religious faith is irrelevant to his qualifications as a president. Senator Obama has expressed his faith as that of Christianity, but Americans should not be afraid of Muslims or elect their leaders based on their religious beliefs. Separation of Church and State is a core principle that should be observed by not only the government, but by voters, as well."cashman said:shit I'm missing something here, someone help me out.
icarus-daedelus said::lol :lol :lol
...
Slurpy said:I guess we just have to trust in the American people not to give in to the bullshit that will soon become much more vicious.
cashman said:yeah I'm starting to see it now. That was very very subtle.
Your standards >>> the public's standards.FDLink said:To me, that was as subtle as a clown in camouflage. Hilary tries often to be subtle to the public, but her execution is usually poor by my standards.
Slurpy said:
Hootie said:Keith Olbermann is the MANN. He churns out ownage like that daily.
c wut i did thar?
GhaleonEB said:miamivice.jpg
And she did something wrong here... how? Stretching that into her somehow slighting or attacking him, or perpetrating the rumor crap that he is Muslim is uh, quite the damn stretch based off that YouTube clip.maynerd said:It's what she said about the false rumor that Obama is a muslim. He's not and she knows it. Yet she uses words like, as far as I know he's not and I'll believe him at his word.
A little bird in the Clinton campaign tells me that it feels like a whole new campaign without Patti Solis Doyle at the helm; that you used to hear 'no' in every direction and now it's all 'get it done'. The term breath of fresh air, or some equivalent, came up. A family friend who'd been in charge of youth outreach has also been shifted out, and I'm told that they've gotten more done on that front in the past three weeks than for several months now. Also, that Mark Penn is widely referred to by staff as Mark Shrum, which I pass on because I think it's funny.
All these conflicting stories. Hear some say it's called an apathetic ghost town. *yawn*Cheebs said:From MyDD
kinda interesting
Too little too late. Her goose is cooked.Cheebs said:From MyDD
kinda interesting
Cheebs said:Here is something to remember:
In California in 2004 hispanic turnout was 16% of the primary electorate. In 2008 it was 30%.
Texas polling is using 2004 % to project what the primary will look like.
Really? I wonder why they are always closest to the final vote then.syllogism said:SurveyUSA doesn't weight their likely voter sub-group samples at all
NY Times earlier this week wrote that the clinton campaign was depressed. They jumped on the optimisim clinton bandwagon today.Triumph said:Too little too late. Her goose is cooked.
At the same time, Mrs. Clinton believes there are new whiffs of momentum around her, advisers say. After being sidelined recently by attention on Mr. Obama and the leading Republican candidate, Senator John McCain, she drew coverage with her latest television commercial about Mr. Obamas ability to handle a crisis, and has pivoted from that to portray herself as the more qualified Democrat on every count.
Cheebs said:The thing is, that paragraph is true. The last week the media ignored hillary other than to say her campaign was depressed. Friday-Sunday it was a far different story. They treated Hillary and Obama on a equal playing field and seemed to give Hillary more attention overall.
While I think Obama will squeak out Texas, the weekends news cycles all were "won" by Hillary.
No one wants to take responsibility, but they think they are well positioned to win, am I rightAs the campaign faces a make-or-break moment, some high-level officials are trying to play down their role in the campaign. Penn said in an e-mail over the weekend that he had "no direct authority in the campaign," describing himself as merely "an outside message advisor with no campaign staff reporting to me."
"I have had no say or involvement in four key areas -- the financial budget and resource allocation, political or organizational sides. Those were the responsibility of Patti Solis Doyle, Harold Ickes and Mike Henry, and they met separately on all matters relating to those areas."
the fact this weekend she is getting tons of coverage about how tough she is fighting and taking on obama when a week ago the media was basically ignoring her and playing up obama vs. mccain?Loudninja said:What have you been watching?
It's the websites you're reading, Cheebs. Among other things, MyDD is one of the most pro-Hillary sites out there.Cheebs said:the fact this weekend she is getting tons of coverage about how tough she is fighting and taking on obama when a week ago the media was basically ignoring her and playing up obama vs. mccain?
I am talking about tv mostly. She had almost no coverage most of the week. the focus was mccain vs. obama. That changed on friday.Sharp said:It's the websites you're reading, Cheebs. Among other things, MyDD is one of the most pro-Hillary sites out there.
Thats from that poll they released saturdayLoudninja said:Latino voters
Obama 30%
Hillary 60%
These are from MSNBC
wow..still ever the pessisist i see (youd think by being wrong the entire campaign so far youd go with the popular consensus on the day he drives the final stake in her heart)Cheebs said:the fact this weekend she is getting tons of coverage about how tough she is fighting and taking on obama when a week ago the media was basically ignoring her and playing up obama vs. mccain?
I've been wrong the entire campaign? I called NH and Nevada right when nearly no one did. And on Super Tuesday I claimed Clinton would win Cali when most of gaf was high on that Zogby poll that had him in the lead. My pessimism so far has proved to work far more than it has been wrong.Schattenjagger said:wow..still ever the pessisist i see (youd think by being wrong the entire campaign so far youd go with the popular consensus on the day he drives the final stake in her heart)
im calling both states for Obama
i dont know youre exact history but youve been more wrong than right.. obama has the most positive coverage/momentum and that hasnt changed for a long time and it will go into tuesdayCheebs said:I've been wrong the entire campaign? I called NH and Nevada right when nearly no one did. And on Super Tuesday I claimed Clinton would win Cali when most of gaf was high on that Zogby poll that had him in the lead. My pessimism so far has proved to work far more than it has been wrong.