:lol that's one hell of a list.Jtyettis said:Do not want.
:lol that's one hell of a list.Jtyettis said:Do not want.
Are you trying to get banned?If only, dreadfully-wrong-article-from-2008, if only.
Excuse the bump, but I didn't think a new thread would be worth this:
I think Exclusives should die out, from the point of view of consumers.
Obviously, from an economic point of view, software drives the console-makers' unit sales and so exclusivity benefits them the most.
But why do you want it?
If emulators can play every Playstation, Nintendo or Xbox game to date (with slight control compromise in the case of nintendo), and each of the major two console makers have similar performance output for their hardware, then why would you, as a consumer, want a new game to be released just for your preferred platform when there's no hardware limitation keeping it from others?
People should have no unfounded allegiance to a specific console maker, so it shouldn't matter
Honest question: why do you want games to be exclusive to your console?
The only thing I can think of is that having a bunch of games from past generations on that console brand would keep you wanting more games on that console brand.
excuse me ?Welcome to 2005.
What’s with the weird necro bumps lately?
Go back and look at how many third party multiplatform games have won GOTYs in the last few years. This site keeps track of ALL goty awards.If only, dreadfully-wrong-article-from-2008, if only.
Excuse the bump, but I didn't think a new thread would be worth this:
I think Exclusives should die out, from the point of view of consumers.
Obviously, from an economic point of view, software drives the console-makers' unit sales and so exclusivity benefits them the most.
But why do you want it?
If emulators can play every Playstation, Nintendo or Xbox game to date (with slight control compromise in the case of nintendo), and each of the major two console makers have similar performance output for their hardware, then why would you, as a consumer, want a new game to be released just for your preferred platform when there's no hardware limitation keeping it from others?
People should have no unfounded allegiance to a specific console maker, so it shouldn't matter
Honest question: why do you want games to be exclusive to your console?
The only thing I can think of is that having a bunch of games from past generations on that console brand would keep you wanting more games on that console brand.
If only, dreadfully-wrong-article-from-2008, if only.
Excuse the bump, but I didn't think a new thread would be worth this:
I think Exclusives should die out, from the point of view of consumers.
Obviously, from an economic point of view, software drives the console-makers' unit sales and so exclusivity benefits them the most.
But why do you want it?
If emulators can play every Playstation, Nintendo or Xbox game to date (with slight control compromise in the case of nintendo), and each of the major two console makers have similar performance output for their hardware, then why would you, as a consumer, want a new game to be released just for your preferred platform when there's no hardware limitation keeping it from others?
People should have no unfounded allegiance to a specific console maker, so it shouldn't matter
Honest question: why do you want games to be exclusive to your console?
The only thing I can think of is that having a bunch of games from past generations on that console brand would keep you wanting more games on that console brand.
Some?To think, some of our members weren’t even born yet when this was posted…
Some?
I don't.why do you want games to be exclusive to your console?
Not from this customers point of view.If only, dreadfully-wrong-article-from-2008, if only.
Excuse the bump, but I didn't think a new thread would be worth this:
I think Exclusives should die out, from the point of view of consumers.