ShockingAlberto
Member
All parents who have named their kids Crystal since World War 2 pretty fucking clearly hate jews.
This isn't the thread for console warrioring, This is a serious issue. Grow up.
I guess it'd be unfair if Sony's incompetence got called out. But no, keep on with your political correctness. Tell me how horrible it is to see a word that makes you upset. And let me tell you how much I appreciate when people like you, who talk about the left and PC, exhibit the exact same behavior as the people you claim to dislike.
The fact that you took that as console warrioring is more a sign that you should grow up, I don't care for that kind of stuff and if you want to drag this into that territory I will simply ignore you. I was only sharing my feelings as a long time customer.
This is just another thing on the pile of still missing 2-step verification, somewhat lacking ps+ choosings and various other support related problems that have popped up as threads in the last few months.
Yes, the dictionary mentions that.
So I guess that's what ISIS is propagating: patience?
Let's not kid ourselves here, when people call upon jihad on the west, they are certainly not just saying "Pledge to god and peacefully assemble to be nice to others". But rather call upon people to strap bombs onto themselves and try to kill as many innocent people as possible.
People who name their kids jihad know this, they do it on purpose, and there should be no sympathy for them when they try to promote jihad on social networks.
You're doing that thing where you think that anyone who disagrees with your is some alt-right regressive. Not the case with me.
What does infuriate me is what you and others here are doing is being purposefully obtuse to the common meaning behind "jihad" so that you can seem like you're super non-racist. In one region of the world, the word has dual meaning. An archaic Arabic term, and the more common Islamic term for violent uprising against non-Muslims. In the rest of the world, only the latter is known.
You claim to be wanting Sony to be tolerant toward a foreign name. But having a username that for the vast majority of the world means "I support Islamic terrorism" is not tolerant at all. Jihad goes hand-in-hand with radical Islam, an ideology that supports the murder of gays, the subjugation of women, and is against the tolerant ideals of the Western world.
If you are a progressive person and want to have a tolerant multicultural society, you have to be against jihadism and radical Islam (or any other radicalised religion). I'm sure you would be fuming if you saw someone with a username of "WestboroBaptists". Apply the same reasoning here.
All parents who have named their kids Crystal since World War 2 pretty fucking clearly hate jews.
You're doing that thing where you think that anyone who disagrees with your is some alt-right regressive. Not the case with me.
What does infuriate me is what you and others here are doing is being purposefully obtuse to the common meaning behind "jihad" so that you can seem like you're super non-racist. In one region of the world, the word has dual meaning. An archaic Arabic term, and the more common Islamic term for violent uprising against non-Muslims. In the rest of the world, only the latter is known.
You claim to be wanting Sony to be tolerant toward a foreign name. But having a username that for the vast majority of the world means "I support Islamic terrorism" is not tolerant at all. Jihad goes hand-in-hand with radical Islam, an ideology that supports the murder of gays, the subjugation of women, and is against the tolerant ideals of the Western world.
If you are a progressive person and want to have a tolerant multicultural society, you have to be against jihadism and radical Islam (or any other radicalised religion). I'm sure you would be fuming if you saw someone with a username of "WestboroBaptists". Apply the same reasoning here.
Jihad is a common name, Osama is a common name, and they will continue being common names. A whole culture isn't going to change because some ignorant people on the other side of the world think they are bad.
Stalin was a monster, but Joseph is still a very common name.
That's....not equivalent. How many kids are being names Kristallnacht?
Sad?Many in my family and relatives name Jihad. Do it on purpose and promote jihad on social networks. Call upon people to strap bombs onto themselves and try to kill as many innocent people as possible?
It's sad to me to see this view in 2016.
Yes, the dictionary mentions that.
So I guess that's what ISIS is propagating: patience?
Let's not kid ourselves here, when people call upon jihad on the west, they are certainly not just saying "Pledge to god and peacefully assemble to be nice to others". But rather call upon people to strap bombs onto themselves and try to kill as many innocent people as possible.
People who name their kids jihad know this, they do it on purpose, and there should be no sympathy for them when they try to promote jihad on social networks.
He can't get a name change because Sonys engineers in their infinite wisdom created a system that doesn't allow it. It was likely turned around because support staff offered a option that wasn't possible.
His name obviously offensive. It sucks it's his real name. I feel bad for him. But it's still offensive and it sounds like he supports terrorism. Sony can't allow that.
Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
"I don't like political correctness but I am going to get super angry and offended if someone uses a word I don't like regardless of context. Fucking PCers!"Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
His name obviously offensive. It sucks it's his real name. I feel bad for him. But it's still offensive and it sounds like he supports terrorism. Sony can't allow that.
So due to the actions of an extreme minority you want an entire culture to change and countless people to change their names so you don't have to see a word?Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
I did not use the Fox News definition.My god it's not about being politically correct it's about having half a brain cell to understand what the word actually means rather than think it's what Fox News tells us what it means.
Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
Does it matter? They know, and I know, what they really mean.
He can't get a name change because Sonys engineers in their infinite wisdom created a system that doesn't allow it. It was likely turned around because support staff offered a option that wasn't possible.
His name obviously offensive. It sucks it's his real name. I feel bad for him. But it's still offensive and it sounds like he supports terrorism. Sony can't allow that.
Yes, the dictionary mentions that.
So I guess that's what ISIS is propagating: patience?
Let's not kid ourselves here, when people call upon jihad on the west, they are certainly not just saying "Pledge to god and peacefully assemble to be nice to others". But rather call upon people to strap bombs onto themselves and try to kill as many innocent people as possible.
People who name their kids jihad know this, they do it on purpose, and there should be no sympathy for them when they try to promote jihad on social networks.
Hello hi please keep your politically correct opinions out of here thank youI did not use the Fox News definition.
I used the Merriam Webster dictionary definition, the very first one.
To just label people who disagree with terrorism as "Fox News consumers" is very lame and disrespectful. People were killed in the name of jihad even before Fox News existed.
I did not use the Fox News definition.
I used the Merriam Webster dictionary definition, the very first one.
To just label people who disagree with terrorism as "Fox News consumers" is very lame and disrespectful. People were killed in the name of jihad even before Fox News existed.
Then make a thread for it?
I did not use the Fox News definition.
I used the Merriam Webster dictionary definition, the very first one.
To just label people who disagree with terrorism as "Fox News consumers" is very lame and disrespectful. People were killed in the name of jihad even before Fox News existed.
Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
My Sister In-Law could not book an appointment at Genius Bar because they said her name was inappropriate.
Her name is Semeen.
I have made a mistake while writing that and I do appologize.I'm confused. At least three people have asked you to source the claim that parents were naming their kids Jihad and Isis and such as an attempt to recruit for terrorism. Why have you not given a source? It makes you sound like a super racist when you won't show that your statement is anything other than hatred of people based on their religion.
Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
Jihad is demonstratively a name that has non-religious and non-terrorist origins.
I have made a mistake while writing that and I do appologize.
I did not mean "on purpose", but more as "they should know what the word means".
Sorry that this mistake on my behalf disturbed the discussion.
Again, I did not think that his parents gave him that name "on purpose" with a plan for the future. But I think that they shoukd have known the ramifications his name might carry for his future.
Yes, I've already said as much.
But you're purposefully ignoring the second meaning. The one that is far more common and it also used by radical Islamic groups themselves for decades to call for a violent murder again non-believers.
The thought that the West has somehow invented a new meaning to a benign name is ridiculous. Jihad is a term used by jihadism themselves. It's not Sony being racist to not want that term associated with its global service. Especially so soon after the jihadist attack in Orlando.
Sad?
It is especially appropriate to see it in 2016. After Paris, Bruxelles, San Bernardino, Orlando....
Madrid, London, New York earlier.
Do you even understand what the word jihad means in the west?
How people can even defend this is beyond me. Just to be politically correct and not insult someone? To me that is insane.
Is their database that badly set up?
That people would take offense to the word Jihad saddened me.
Just goes to show that in terms of something "exotic" like Islam, most people would just follow the meaning their media bombard them with, and not the real one. I guess expecting people to search or at least make an effort to understand/study it is too tall of an order.
Sad.
Oh, I agree there. I was in no way trying to defend Sony.Perhaps Sony should have considered the ramifications of not auto-flagging the word.
Jk, they're a corporation, they should be held to the lowest standard possible.
So weird they ban him after having the name for years. But even then why go straight to banning? Is it because they have no way of changing a name even for something like this? Is their database that badly set up?