googleplex
Member
They'll most likely use the SPU's in some fashion, but they won't be connected to a PPU.Lagaff said:I wonder if they gonna use the cell again, they will probably i suppose
They'll most likely use the SPU's in some fashion, but they won't be connected to a PPU.Lagaff said:I wonder if they gonna use the cell again, they will probably i suppose
Funny, my PS3 plays PS1 games just fine.Varjet said:Didn't they also once say that backward compatibility is part of the "PlayStation DNA" or something?
airmangataosenai said:By the time the PS4 comes out, the PS3 will be 7 years old at earliest (Assuming it does indeed release Holiday 2013), that'll be the longest period we've ever gone without a new hardware iteration from them. Anyone thinking it won't be as substantial as the leaps we've seen in the past are insane.
Varjet said:Didn't they also once say that backward compatibility is part of the "PlayStation DNA" or something?
He says nothing in there that implies he actually knows anything about the actual R&D going into the PS4. You seriously think PS4 will just be a rebranded PS3 in 2013 right after they released a handheld in the same league of performance for $250 in 2011?DaSorcerer7 said:Well, the Sony Exec who inferred to the contrary and directly contradicts what you are (thinking/hoping??). And I would think that he in the position he's in would be more privy to that sort of information, certainly more than the random forum posters such as ourselves.
airmangataosenai said:He says nothing in there that implies he actually knows anything about the actual R&D going into the PS4. You seriously think PS4 will just be a rebranded PS3 in 2013 right after they released a handheld in the same league of performance for $250 in 2011?
And as has been pointed out, Yoshida is already running damage control on this quote.
but it is. the vita plays psp games. the ps3 plays ps2/ps1 games. just because the newer ps3s don't have BC doesn't mean the ps3 never had it. so far, every gen of playstation systems has played the previous gens games.Varjet said:Didn't they also once say that backward compatibility is part of the "PlayStation DNA" or something?
Desmond said:Yoshida is probably the greatest thing to happen to SCE in recent years.
If first gen PS3 games look like Battlefield 3 then I'll be happy.antonz said:Majority of Gaf is gonna be disappointed in the end anyways. Visually Next Gen is not going to be half as big as alot of people think
So you don't know about the psp games on psn?StevieP said:I had no idea the Vita had a UMD drive. Thanks GAF!
mckmas8808 said:So you don't know about the psp games on psn?
StevieP said:I had no idea the Vita had a UMD drive. Thanks GAF!
Are you mad? This means I have to walk, yes, walk, to the same shelf where I keep my vita and pick up my psp. This is the 21st century. I shouldn't have to have an old console.FTH said:Apparently old PSPs still play UMDs... I know right?! Crazy... not 100% sure though.
TheBranca18 said:Snarky and ineffective.
Jinko said:Seems like they want to be profitable next gen, can't blame them after the PS3 mess, I have been saying it for a while but anyone expecting a 10 times jump in performance next gen is kidding themselves.
As far as I know MS want to be profitable as well, so unless we all want to fork out $600-700 don't expect the top of the shelf tech in the next gen consoles.
It plays PSP software from PSN, so its backwards compatible.StevieP said:Of course. But that's not full BC. What of all those UMDs people have purchased over the years?
StevieP said:Sarcasm aside, I'd like to see a "enter your UMD serial code to claim your digital download" for PSP -> Vita owners. Wouldn't you?
StevieP said:Sarcasm aside, I'd like to see a "enter your UMD serial code to claim your digital download" for PSP -> Vita owners. Wouldn't you?
Gravijah said:And how would you stop people giving their UMDs to friends to redeem copies? Sharing across forums and the internet? There doesn't seem to be a good way to do it, other than maybe sending in your UMDs and receiving vouchers, but that would never happen.
They don't really owe anyone anything at the end of the day
gundamkyoukai said:You could make something for 400 that would be near that 10x jump.
PS3 and X Box 360 are 7 years old .
PortTwo said:Xbox 360 is 5 years and 7 months old.
PS3 is 4 years and 7 months old.
Not trying to be pedantic but I constantly see these figures strangely inflated. No backpeddling on when they were developed, this is when they came out.
gundamkyoukai said:That is true still i stand by my point .
MuseManMike said:Perhaps I should have clarified. I'm not talking about a brand new processor architecture or media format. I think we'll see the Cell again, and some variation of Blu-ray as well. What I meant to say is that we won't see a transition akin to the GC --> Wii (just in specs alone). In other words, it won't be a repackaged PS3 + slight alterations. It'll be it's own machine -- distinguishable from the PS3.
Diablos said:Sony would be dumb to abandon Cell, because so many devs put their sweat and blood into games to simply take advantage of the CPU as intended.
StevieP said:My PC is like 50x more powerful than both consoles. The games I play on it, maxed out at 1080p, do not look 50x better. What's your point?
cpp_is_king said:The odds of seeing a cell processor again are approximately 0.
Actually they would be dumb to keep the cell, since everyone fucking hates developing for it with a passion.
cpp_is_king said:The odds of seeing a cell processor again are approximately 0.
Actually they would be dumb to keep the cell, since everyone fucking hates developing for it with a passion.
cpp_is_king said:The odds of seeing a cell processor again are approximately 0.
Actually they would be dumb to keep the cell, since everyone fucking hates developing for it with a passion.
cpp_is_king said:The odds of seeing a cell processor again are approximately 0.
Actually they would be dumb to keep the cell, since everyone fucking hates developing for it with a passion.
Metalmurphy said:The chances of seeing another Cell or another processor with similar sturcture is actually quite high.
zomgbbqftw said:I would like to know what experience you have which makes you so very certain of this outcome?
Very unlikely. EDIT: Nvm, you said something similar to everything else out there. I thought you said something similar to cell. Yes, it may very well be something similar to everything else out there. (i.e. other consoles)Proelite said:Sony will not be using a completely new processor design again. It'll either be the cell or something similar to everything else out there.
Alx said:Didn't IBM discontinue the production of Cell 2 years ago ? They may keep the general philosophy for the next processors, but it won't be a Cell...
cpp_is_king said:Not the answer you're looking for, but I'd rather not say.
Metalmurphy said:Get with the times. Everyone that actually tries, instead of just "crap we gotta port" actually loves the Cell.
You should check out the Frostbite engine 2 presentations by DICE. One example of many.
The chances of seeing another Cell or another processor with similar sturcture is actually quite high.
ok, i'm a developer. Anyway, the chances of them making another cell aren't 0, but I can tell you that there are some developers that feel very strongly about not developing for another Cell. And I don't mean small studios.zomgwtfbbq said:Unless you are going to get a bollocking from your employer, just say you're a developer, it would save us all the trouble...
gundamkyoukai said:My point was for 400 you can get PS4 that is 10x the power of PS3 .
Also it don't matter how good your PC is , not like devs go all out on PC hardware or any where near close.
cpp_is_king said:Oh believe me, I'm more aware of these things than you might think.
ok, i'm a developer. Anyway, the chances of them making another cell aren't 0, but I can tell you that many prominent developers are throwing alot of weight around to make sure Sony doesn't do another Cell.
Proelite said:By do another Cell, do you mean re-use Cell again, or make something completely new like the Cell was in 2006.
googleplex said:It plays PSP software from PSN, so its backwards compatible.
cpp_is_king said:I don't want to speculate, so all I really can say is that many people are very unhappy with the current architecture.
cpp_is_king said:ok, i'm a developer. Anyway, the chances of them making another cell aren't 0, but I can tell you that there are some developers that feel very strongly about not developing for another Cell. And I don't mean small studios.
Proelite said:I am assuming it is because of the difficulties porting code over from PC / 360?
AranhaHunter said:Maybe a mod can verify that you are indeed an insider and not just blowing smoke out of your ass. This is interesting information if you are who you say you are.