Except that they're still selling the current consoles for $300. You really think brand new consoles will only be $100 more?Nothing about the new PS4 or Xbox (rumors) suggest they'll be expensive tbh. Far less impressive tech than their predecessors, relatively.
Sony is trying hard to maintain an image of premium. Vita was a good example of this. i bet they're gonna double-down on that for consoles and we'll see a single $499 model. the strategy could work, Vita was just a big misread of the handheld console market.
Except that they're still selling the current consoles for $300. You really think brand new consoles will only be $100 more?
Except that they're still selling the current consoles for $300. You really think brand new consoles will only be $100 more?
I've been aiming for $499 with the cash I've been putting aside and I think that's exactly what we are going to get.
They could drop the PS3 price a few months before the PS4 release. Nintendo did something similar with the Wii right?
Except that they're still selling the current consoles for $300. You really think brand new consoles will only be $100 more?
I don't understand why a lot of people expectin ps4 at 499$. It's still very high compared the past generation launch (ps3 a part). Realistically talking there is nothing of so expensive in the ps4 hardware, an optimal machine, but it use a x86 cpu, 399$ is quite enough to avoid any losing.
I think Sony will follow Microsoft's rumored structure of $300 subsidized via PS+ and $500 w/o.
Sony is trying hard to maintain an image of premium. Vita was a good example of this. i bet they're gonna double-down on that for consoles and we'll see a single $499 model. the strategy could work, Vita was just a big misread of the handheld console market.
I don't understand why a lot of people expecting ps4 at 499$ to cover the cost. It's still very high compared the past generation launch (ps3 a part). Realistically talking there is nothing of so expensive in the ps4 hardware, an optimal machine, yeah, but it use a x86 cpu, 399$ is quite enough to avoid any loss. 8 GB of GDDR 5 not change so much, bandwith is pared back. In any case, it's a suicide for the first years.
Well what did they do with Vita?
But that's more about there being less price depreciation this gen compared to last, not so much about starting price. 360 launched at $400 and is also still being sold in $300 packages, 8 yrs later. They could very easily go the same route with the next gen - slower price depreciation, rather than higher starting prices.Except that they're still selling the current consoles for $300. You really think brand new consoles will only be $100 more?
I think $399 is very realistic as well. They're going to lose money on the H/W period for the first couple of years. They good thing is they won't be bleeding money from the H/W like they did with the PS3 which was extremely expensive to manufacture.
blu-ray was brand new and those blue laser diodes were expensive as hell, cell was super expensive and sony was involved in it's manufacture as well, xdr ram = expensive, buying the RSX gpu cost a pretty penny... even wifi was expensive back in this age.
there's nothing cutting edge about the PS4. all of the major components inside of it is based on existing tech and they're not involved with fabrication like they were with the cell and blu-ray.
$399 low sku & $499 higher margin sku (more hdd space and psn+). that sounds reasonable.
Charged an insane amount of money for proprietary memory cards that you had to buy to play games.
I think it will be $499
Who said they can't do something similiar with PS4? Have they talked about their memory solutions yet?
If they come out with a console that costs less than their previous console, when it launched, there could be the perception that the jump in power is not that big.
The actual price of the PS3 was between $700 and $900.
But the public only saw $ 599. Sony can now sell the console at cost for
$ 599 and be in better shape then when the PS3 launched.
At $500 "decent" would at least include hardware BC. Sorry.It will be at least $500, don't complain if you want something decent you need to pay up. Don't settle for less just to want a cheaper price.
I may be in the minority but I'm not encouraged at all by this news. All this really means to me as a consumer is a higher MSRP.
I expect the price to be $449, I don't see why it would be $500+ there isn't anything fancy about the hardware this time.
Gaf was totally wrong on the Vita pricing. Tons of crows were had on the pricing.
If they come out with a console that costs less than their previous console, when it launched, there could be the perception that the jump in power is not that big.
500 dollars and no cheaper model and they'll be laughed off the market. And to be honest it took until the PS3 was 299 to start to have an impact because there is definitely a mental barrier. There will be a subsidized model at 250-299.
Thats because people assumed for whatever reason that cell phones are sold to consumers at near costs when the 600 dollars for smartphones is the biggest scam. 450 sounds reasonable. This thing will not be sold for less than 399 and no subsidy.
The mass market will not be signing 2 year service agreements for a fucking video games consoles. The unsubsidized price is the only one that matters. It will launch at 350 or 399.
lol they do it for the 360 apparently. Even have to get a credit check, and if you think 350 you're definitely crazy. 399 is probably insane too.
Nothing new. Keyword being 'Major', there will be some loss.
No crazy Cell chip and no new disc format like BD.
I'm still bit weirded out that the PS4 has component out when even the Wii-U has HDMI only [edit: apparently that's not the case, has a multiport]. Seems like it would be an opportunity to save by removing it.
I mean, the PS4 doesn't play music cd's because they don't want to pay the license.
Dat 8GB GDDR5 probably has a high cost though.
Expecting:
$399 for barebones SKU.
$499 for (barebones SKU) + Game, PSEye and one year of PS+.
It's probably going to be 400-450.
Gaf was totally wrong on the Vita pricing. Tons of crows were had on the pricing.