you don't, actually...Oblivion said:How do you find that, anyway?
you don't, actually...Oblivion said:How do you find that, anyway?
yoopoo said:What guys? Its mostly a guy, Amir0x. Dude needs to get new material.
Jonnyram said:Sorry... the %s were "% of people who bought non-game that also went on to buy real game". i.e. 20% of all the people who bought brain training bought NSMB.
TheKingsCrown said:I think you people have misinterpreted Amir0x's comments on a Drinky Crow level.
Amir0x said:Tell on you? I can just ban if I like. I was just giving you a friendly warning - ad hominen attacks are against the TOS, and if you want to stick around you should simply stay on point. I certainly had no intent to insult you, or get personal.
I apologize if you dislike factual observations about Wii's technical capabilities, but this isn't the soundwave05 show. Room for all sides.
no im not. im his friendAmir0x said:I didn't ban ant, and I don't think it was for this.
Also if you're a dual account for ant, you better admit it now or you're gonna get permed.
He knows because I think he is a friend of Ant.Oblivion said:How do you find that, anyway?
Paladin69 said:"Continue the Nintendo fellating"
well they do come off a bit trollish...aka trying to provoke a negative response...
soundwave05 said:"Room for all sides" doesn't mean "lets derail every friggin' thread". That's actually called trolling (which is basically just acting like a jack ass), if you want to quote the TOS.
Which is basically all you've been doing since E3. If that bothers you to hear it ... how's that my fault?
It's your own behavior. If you want get all upset about it and do whatever you wanna do, like I said, big whoop. I'm not losing any sleep over it.
Paladin69 said:"Continue the Nintendo fellating"
well they do come off a bit trollish...aka trying to provoke a negative response...
TheKingsCrown said:I'm pretty sure Amir0x posts what he does because he sees everyone say the same things every time and wants to get it out of the way. ;0)
I'm downloading the stream. Turns out it is being lame and makes me download a very slow and small movie size of the whole hour and a half. Hopefully someone can beat me to getting it up.unifin said:Anyone have a mac-friendly version of the Pokemon video?
Looks great in screens, but I'll wait for direct feed - distance + shaky cam tend to make games look better than they really look...
Amir0x said:oh no, I actually consider the responses positive. I like hearing the other side of the coin, honestly.
How is posting on topic about the graphical prowess of a game in said thread - the same graphical prowess others commented on positively - derailing a thread? Seems 'derailing' means 'posting something you don't like' in soundwave05 terms.
Anyway, it doesn't bother me for you to say it at all. However, saying 'you need to get laid. seriously' is not saying that, it's an ad hominen attack and serves no general purpose as well as being against 'da rules.'
TheKingsCrown said:I'm pretty sure Amir0x posts what he does because he sees everyone say the same things
soundwave05 said:Like I said, if you want to get all hot and bothered by what I said ... go right ahead. I'd actually be rather amused. Seems like I struck a nerve with the comment anyway.
The Wii doesn't have the best graphics (when did Nintendo say they were even trying to?) ... yeah, OK, thanks for the newsflash there buddy.
Paladin69 said:and that makes it okay?
Amir0x said:d...do you honestly think my response equates to hitting a nerve? Because I thought I was just doing you a favor, but whatever man!
But uh, yeah... I wasn't trying to fill in with new information. Just like I don't need to know how you're so enarmoured with Nintendo's Wii strategy... yet you still keep posting about it and making the same points! Room for all sides, brudduh.
Who had that for an avatar? That's the first I've seen of it. Hilarious.TheKingsCrown said:Like someone said, yes we do.
soundwave05 said:I dunno, you seem to be making a big deal outta the comment. I don't take it back. Your posts do suggest some type of frustration on your part, and if you're offended by that ... I couldn't care less.
Everyone on the board is quite aware of your feelings on this matter, so do we have to put up with the "Amirox" show every time there's a new Nintendo announcement of game shown?
Because the act is getting pretty damn old, "brudduh".
Stormbringer said:Hey ! soundwave05 is right! Amirox is fooling you ! Let's make him fall from his throne and maul him to death !
Power to the citizens!...Right guys ?
Amir0x said:I'm aware of your feelings on this matter too! But you're still posting about it! Oh... right... only positive comments bare repeating.
Anyway, this is a circle of doom - if you do an ad hominen insult again, against anyone, you will get severe ban. Not least because of your seeming disregard of the matter. And that's all to say on THAT subject.
jj984jj said:Wow, Pokemon Wii looks... like an X-Box game.
TheKingsCrown said:Amir0x's mission accomplished!!!1111111111
TheKingsCrown said:Well I for one am rather tired of hearing about crappy textures that are becoming more and more irrelevant this generation....I say that in terms of mass market appeal, not graphics whore. I know plenty of graphics whores in the mass market who have totally converted and now believe that games are getting stale and graphics are good enough that there needs to be something else to games.
nintendo meeting said:Seems they want to get more non-gamers into games gradually - the above stats seem to indicate such a motion.
I have to disagree. The models, the lighting, and the environment all look better then any XBox game I know of. Put that together with the very good animation (IMO), and we have an at least XBox 1.5 looking game.jj984jj said:Wow, Pokemon Wii looks... like an X-Box game.
jj984jj said:Wow, Pokemon Wii looks... like an X-Box game.
JavyOO7 said:And in other news the sky is blue.
birdchili said:they can't bring this up enough for me. as much as they're constantly saying they want to continue to cater to the hardcore demographic, the sales of 'brain age' and similar, coupled with their 'new direction' keeps making me nervous that they're putting too many resources in things that i'm highly unlikely to buy (ie: "non-games").
using the 'non-games' as a gateway drug to the other stuff is interesting though... do they think that non-standard games don't have the longevity of the old-style-games?
i suppose if they can get *everyone* to buy one type of game, that's ideal for them... hmmm...
still fearful for the future of "big" games on Nintendo platforms.
birdchili said:they can't bring this up enough for me. as much as they're constantly saying they want to continue to cater to the hardcore demographic, the sales of 'brain age' and similar, coupled with their 'new direction' keeps making me nervous that they're putting too many resources in things that i'm highly unlikely to buy (ie: "non-games").
using the 'non-games' as a gateway drug to the other stuff is interesting though... do they think that non-standard games don't have the longevity of the old-style-games?
i suppose if they can get *everyone* to buy one type of game, that's ideal for them... hmmm...
still fearful for the future of "big" games on Nintendo platforms.
birdchili said:they can't bring this up enough for me. as much as they're constantly saying they want to continue to cater to the hardcore demographic, the sales of 'brain age' and similar, coupled with their 'new direction' keeps making me nervous that they're putting too many resources in things that i'm highly unlikely to buy (ie: "non-games").
using the 'non-games' as a gateway drug to the other stuff is interesting though... do they think that non-standard games don't have the longevity of the old-style-games?
i suppose if they can get *everyone* to buy one type of game, that's ideal for them... hmmm...
still fearful for the future of "big" games on Nintendo platforms.
Amir0x said:The critical percentage I want to see is how many of the individuals that brought Brain Age were non-gamers in the first place... because 20% certainly sounds like a number that would be reflective of the amount of 'real' gamers that might have purchased the title... and if that is the 20% that went on to buy NSMB, then it's pretty irrelevant. I wonder if in the future there's any way to gauge this.
JavyOO7 said:I trhink Nintendo said about 35% of folks over the age of 35 bought Brain Training. The game has sold alot... no way it could be soely gamers. I think a healthy percentage of folks who never bought a game in their lives bought Brain Age.
Yes, it does. Not by that much, though. NG is still very impressive.jj984jj said:It doesn't look any better then this:
JavyOO7 said:get used to seeing Brain Training Wii and Super Mario Galaxy in the top 10 charts together for a while whent hey come out.
jj984jj said:It doesn't look any better then this:
Amir0x said:The critical percentage I want to see is how many of the individuals that brought Brain Age were non-gamers in the first place... because 20% certainly sounds like a number that would be reflective of the amount of 'real' gamers that might have purchased the title... and if that is the 20% that went on to buy NSMB, then it's pretty irrelevant. I wonder if in the future there's any way to gauge this.
Deku said:No Amir, you're just in denial.
Gawaian said:He knows because I think he is a friend of Ant.