• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Trump advisor Flynn discussed sanctions w/ Russia before inauguration, despite denial

Status
Not open for further replies.
Geeze even anime has never attempted a plot line like this (and they have predicted quite a few surprisingly)

Guess I should have been nicer to those Russian tourists that were in my city last month and got a few pointers...
 

BlueTsunami

there is joy in sucking dick
Vid: https://youtu.be/_CGh1b_tmj0

Pics:

uszdQG7.jpg

3fXnYwm.jpg

Fuck Jill Stein with a 10 ft pole. Ugh. Hope Flynn is dragged in the mud.
 

Blader

Member
Flynn will probably squeak through this, but he's so fucking stupid he will undoubtedly land himself in another scandal within six months.
 

chadskin

Member
The acting attorney general informed the Trump White House late last month that she believed Michael Flynn had misled senior administration officials about the nature of his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States, and warned that the national security adviser was potentially vulnerable to Russian blackmail, current and former U.S. officials said.

The message, delivered by Sally Q. Yates and a senior career national security official to the White House counsel, was prompted by concerns that ­Flynn, when asked about his calls and texts with the Russian diplomat, had told Vice ­President-elect Mike Pence and others that he had not discussed the Obama administration sanctions on Russia for its interference in the 2016 election, the officials said. It is unclear what the White House counsel, Donald McGahn, did with the information.

In the waning days of the Obama administration, James R. Clapper Jr., who was the director of national intelligence, and John Brennan, the CIA director at the time, shared Yates's concerns and concurred with her recommendation to inform the Trump White House. They feared that ”Flynn had put himself in a compromising position" and thought that Pence had a right to know that he had been misled, according to one of the officials, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

A senior Trump administration official said that the White House was aware of the matter, adding that ”we've been working on this for weeks."

The current and former officials said that although they believed that Pence was misled about the contents of Flynn's communications with the Russian ambassador, they couldn't rule out that Flynn was acting with the knowledge of others in the transition.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...63470bf0401_story.html?utm_term=.a2c48baeaad9
 

Tovarisc

Member
Justice Department warned White House that Flynn could be vulnerable to Russian blackmail, officials say

The acting attorney general informed the Trump White House late last month that she believed Michael Flynn had misled senior administration officials about the nature of his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States, and warned that the national security adviser was potentially vulnerable to Russian blackmail, current and former U.S. officials said.

The message, delivered by Sally Q. Yates and a senior career national security official to the White House counsel, was prompted by concerns that ­Flynn, when asked about his calls and texts with the Russian diplomat, had told Vice ­President-elect Mike Pence and others that he had not discussed the Obama administration sanctions on Russia for its interference in the 2016 election, the officials said. It is unclear what the White House counsel, Donald McGahn, did with the information.

In the waning days of the Obama administration, James R. Clapper Jr., who was the director of national intelligence, and John Brennan, the CIA director at the time, shared Yates's concerns and concurred with her recommendation to inform the Trump White House. They feared that ”Flynn had put himself in a compromising position" and thought that Pence had a right to know that he had been misled, according to one of the officials, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

A senior Trump administration official said that the White House was aware of the matter, adding that ”we've been working on this for weeks."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...5dab88-f228-11e6-8d72-263470bf0401_story.html

Edit: compromised
 

Tovarisc

Member
What if this is the true reason Trump fired Yates?

Most likely this plays into it and she defying him when it came to defending EO was perfect opening to fire her.

Tinfoil: Trump made her make that public stand and give him official reason to fire her, while hoping Flynn stuff would stay buried
 

chadskin

Member
President Donald Trump's adviser and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is involved in a search for candidates to replace Michael Flynn, according to sources close to the administration, even as the president's senior advisers publicly continue to send mixed signals about the fate of the embattled national security adviser.

”They are trying to figure out the solution to Flynn right now," said one of the sources. ”The problem is they don't have it yet. They need to get a solution. You can't have a firing without an immediate replacement. You need a plan."

The list includes retired Gen. David Petraeus, who's scheduled to meet with Trump at the White House this week, according to two people familiar with the plans. Other possibilities: Stephen Hadley, who served as national security adviser under President George W. Bush; Tom Bossert, who also served as a national security aide under Bush and now oversees cybersecurity under Trump; Adm. James Stavridis, dean of the Fletcher School at Tufts; and Department of Homeland Security head John Kelly.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-flynn-replace-kushner-234977

Stavridis would be a dream pick.
 

ICO_SotC

Member
So Yates, Clapper, and Brennan wanted this to be taken care but, but guess who tried to step in.

FBI Director James B. Comey initially opposed notification, citing concerns that it could complicate the agency’s investigation.
 

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
The reason it's taking so long for this all to come out is because everyone is implicated. Trump, Pence, Comey, Flynn.

Watch for the conventional wisdom to suddenly rally to Pence's side as this castle comes crumbling down. Just know he was in on it too.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Another trump thread bereft of Trump supporters.

Hopefully they'll just slink back into obscurity and shame for a few years.
 

nomis

Member
I now read all articles about WH/Kremlin ties while listening to the score from captain america the winter soldier
 

VariantX

Member
What if this is the true reason Trump fired Yates?

This is straight up clown shoes. As if these people didn't look suspect enough. Even if her firing was 100% about the EO, in reality, no one can not think this wasn't a factor. Im actually impressed at how incompetent they are at trying to draw attention away from this.
 

Blader

Member
How many times did Trump rip into Bush for his disastrous foreign policy - and now is looking at his national security adviser as a replacement for Flynn?

Stavridis would be the best choice and therefore won't happen. Petraeus would be okay too, despite the massive hypocrisy. John Kelly? Would they find a new head of DHS then? Maybe someone a little more Muslim-ban-friendly?
 
Holy fuck...

Not surprised. Their entire administration needs to removed.

The reason it's taking so long for this all to come out is because everyone is implicated. Trump, Pence, Comey, Flynn.

Watch for the conventional wisdom to suddenly rally to Pence's side as this castle comes crumbling down. Just know he was in on it too.

This.

And if you can believe it it's only been a couple of weeks and we keep learning more shit like this....
 

~Kinggi~

Banned
I mean, the optimist in me is thinking that Trump still has a base, a base of crazy people that dont necessarily care about facts or ethics etc etc. So this whole situation being drawn out with drips of leaks and shit is an effort to get as many moderates against him as possible before they pull the trigger and take him out, because when they do that, i can guarantee you the shithead is gonna tweet some crap like 'my 2nd amendment people need to take to the streets they are trying to steal america!!!!11"

thats when you have the civil war.
 

Gutek

Member
I mean, the optimist in me is thinking that Trump still has a base, a base of crazy people that dont necessarily care about facts or ethics etc etc. So this whole situation being drawn out with drips of leaks and shit is an effort to get as many moderates against him as possible before they pull the trigger and take him out, because when they do that, i can guarantee you the shithead is gonna tweet some crap like 'my 2nd amendment people need to take to the streets they are trying to steal america!!!!11"

thats when you have the civil war.

Bullshit. If there is anyone that will start a civil war, it's the military against their own people. Military loves Trump.
 
Yeah at this point I can only hope this takes down Trump and the rest of the Republican party. They're all complicit as far as I'm concerned. Every single one deserves to labeled as a traitor.

This. But we all know it won't even when committing this level of stuff (and that includes all of them Trump, Pence, etc.). *sigh*

What’s going on was explained lucidly by a senior Pentagon intelligence official, who stated that “since January 20, we’ve assumed that the Kremlin has ears inside the SITROOM,” meaning the White House Situation Room, the 5,500 square-foot conference room in the West Wing where the president and his top staffers get intelligence briefings. “There’s not much the Russians don’t know at this point,” the official added in wry frustration.

Damn.

Jeez...

BUT E-MAILS!
 
The reason it's taking so long for this all to come out is because everyone is implicated. Trump, Pence, Comey, Flynn.

Watch for the conventional wisdom to suddenly rally to Pence's side as this castle comes crumbling down. Just know he was in on it too.

All the stories coming out indicate that Pence is furious at Flynn for straight up lying to his face. He has plausible deniability.
 

NYR

Member
NewsMax CEO is on CNN saying "So what if he talked about sanctions?"

We've moved on to the no-big-deal defense.
Watching now. This guy is a tool. Shame on CNN for putting him on - the only credential he has is he says he is Trump's friend. They have had him on 2 days in a row after he attacked Rince and got press for it.
 
CNN (actually all of them) needs to stop giving those people a mouthpiece without at least giving major comebacks that put them in their place, same with that embarrassment of a human being, Lord who gets to spout bullshit and only rarely does someone get in the last word after him to shut that shit down at the end.

Lol. Where was that concern for a fair election Comey you piece of shit?

Fucking Comey just keeps raising the bar on his level of shitstain.

NewsMax CEO is on CNN saying "So what if he talked about sanctions?"

We've moved on to the no-big-deal defense.

What's a little treason right, Mr. CEO? lol
 
I doubt anyone other than Trump is implicated with Flynn.

But uhh... Trump makes the final decision so he obviously doesn't want Flynn to say what happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom