Mango The Magician
Banned
Shut up.
What a tired argument.
Wonderful rebuttal.
Shut up.
What a tired argument.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
Well I'm only a civillian so I can't really comment on what it's like in the military.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
Wonderful rebuttal.
Ok...but they lost the vote? So why is the media focus important? What are you even saying?
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
Given human history, it's always troubling to see people not only generalizing a group of individuals, but also demonizing a group of individuals. Also, it's called a hyperbole, I used it to illustrate a point.YEAH GUIZ IT'S SURPRISING YOU ARENT MURDERERS YET!!!
The person made it abundantly clear that his family wasn't "evil incarnate" and yet many jump on him (them?) and called their family every name in the book, just because they're republican.How is any of that "crazy"? People are rightfully calling out republican voters for what they are.
Given human history, it's always troubling to see people not only generalizing a group of individuals, but also demonizing a group of individuals. Also, it's called a hyperbole, I used it to illustrate a point.
The person made it abundantly clear that his family wasn't "evil incarnate" and yet many jump on him (them?) and called their family every name in the book, just because they're republican.
That's absurd.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
My main question is whether this can be taken to court, any policy now that seeks to exclude trans people from the military for medical reasons. Wouldn't Trump's policy have to include a justification why, for instance, it allows people with erectile dysfunction to receive care for it on the government's dime as someone pointed out above?
I already tried talking about the topic at hand, and was raked over a bed of spikes for daring to be a moderate in regards to the issue.Do you have anything to say about the topic at hand or do you enjoy tone policing?
Given human history, it's always troubling to see people not only generalizing a group of individuals, but also demonizing a group of individuals. Also, it's called a hyperbole, I used it to illustrate a point.
The person made it abundantly clear that his family wasn't "evil incarnate" and yet many jump on him (them?) and called their family every name in the book, just because they're republican.
That's absurd.
My main question is whether this can be taken to court, any policy now that seeks to exclude trans people from the military for medical reasons. Wouldn't Trump's policy have to include a justification why, for instance, it allows people with erectile dysfunction to receive care for it on the government's dime as someone pointed out above?
I already tried talking about the topic at hand, and was raked over a bed of spikes for daring to be a moderate in regards to the issue.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
I already tried talking about the topic at hand, and was raked over a bed of spikes for daring to be a moderate in regards to the issue.
I'm confused isn't there a law that prohibits hiring based on gender/race?
I'm not to familiar with laws and how they work but remember that being a thing
The whole false argument of "liberals are gonna do something evil one day!" is such tired bs. We have republicans doing terrible things every day.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
Heh..I wish that folks that pop in with their rebuke of words said by a bunch of nobodies on a nobody forum would, at minimum, write twice the amount of paragraphs to denounce shit said by assholes that control our lives. It ain't gonna happen, but it'd be nice..unless they agree. 🤔
I'm not racist! I voted for Hitler, but I'm not racist
Wonderful rebuttal.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
someone's humanity isn't politics
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
Some of them, sure. Definitely.
Here we go. I am going to open myself up to a firestorm of hate from the Rep haters here, but here we go.
I consider myself a left of center moderate, with libertarian leanings. I fucking despised Trump. But I didnt vote because I didnt like Hilary either, and I chose not to choose between the lesser of two evils. However, I live in Texas, so my vote was largely irrelevant. Texas was going for Trump.
Now for the shitty part....
99% of my family are republicans. Including my highly educated parents. They are not racist. They are not bigoted. My sister is a lesbian and they love her dearly. So before I say anything else, FUCK ANYONE that acuses my family of voting for Trump because of being racist or bigoted.
My family, INCLUDING MY LESBIAN SISTER, almost all voted for Trump. They did it because they were gullible, bought into his charade, his cavalcade of lies. My sister was going to vote Hilary until she heard the deplorables comment. That single statement swung her vote to a man she otherwise wouldnt have voted for.
I get so goddamn sick and tired of this us vs them shit and everyone inthese threads accusing ALL republicans of the despicable nature that is so obvious in Trump, and by turning a blind eye to his actions, the rest of the Reps in washington.
So yes, fuck republican politicians. Fuck any of the racist bigoted republicans who voted for Trump for those reasons. But I draw the line there.
And people are so caught up in supporting their goddamn team, that they refuse to accept this reality. They refuse to accept the fact that there are good, hard working, loving, non racist, non bigoted republicans out there like my family that voted for this incompentent, blubbering, bigoted orange toad simply because they were so short sighted and gullible that they believed the lies of his that they cherry picked and chose to focus on, blind to the rest of what was so obvious about him to me and most other neutrals/democrats.
Yes my statement of fuck both sides is probably taking this long-winded response too far in the other direction, and obfuscating the fact that the subject matter at hand is most definitely tied to the evils of the republican party. But I do hate both sides, insofar as I hate the fact that we have "sides" at all.
Yep, and human nature sucks. I did read your post. I think I agree with a lot of what you say. My feelings on the matter at hand are covered above. I will probably step back from this thread because I am sure my family is about to be shit on and I dont feel like getting banned defending them.
What does it mean to be a moderate on this issue? I'm confused as to what constitutes that stance.
I can't claim to know the full effects of being a post-transitioned Transgender individual, or all of the issues that comes in regards to medical costs. I also can't claim to know anything about the military or what's needed to be a part of said military.
But...I have a especially hard time imaging that a trans solider would be such an issue, if under the Obama administration, this was almost allowed. I mean, Obama was a ok president, but I trust his judgement far more then I trust the orange stain in the white house.
The US Justice Department on Wednesday argued in a major federal lawsuit that a 1964 civil rights law doesnt protect gay workers from discrimination, thereby diverging from a separate, autonomous federal agency that had supported the gay plaintiffs case.
Meanwhile when they bigots come right out with it, they reveal themselves to be the real subhuman pieces of shit.
I already tried talking about the topic at hand, and was raked over a bed of spikes for daring to be a moderate in regards to the issue.
How is it that everytime I come to this site, the people on it manage to set a new level of crazy?
Christ, I'm surprised some of you haven't started killing people you politically disagree with.
someone's humanity isn't politics
Retired Gen. Elazar Stern was stupefied when a reporter from Israel Army Radio called Wednesday to ask for his reaction to President Trump's series of tweets about banning the service of transgender military personnel.
”What?" Stern asked. ”Why?"
”It makes us strong that we don't waste time on questions like this," said Stern, the former commander of the Israel Defense Forces Manpower Command. "It's something to be proud of."
Speaking with The Times, Stern, now a member of Israel's parliament for the centrist Yesh Atid party, said that throughout his 34-year career in the army, ”in every post, at every level, always, I knew there were homosexual individuals serving with me. No transgendered people that I knew of, but maybe. We would never ask, honestly, and we're not supposed to know. The army's task is to support its soldiers no matter what their needs, not meddle about in their lives."
The Israel Defense Forces have knowingly included transgender soldiers since 1998. In 2014, the Israeli military said it had at least five transgender members and would support future such conscripts. As of last year, it was among 19 countries, including the United States, that allowed transgender people to serve in the military.
Israel's national healthcare plan provides stipends to citizens who are transitioning.
Stern said he believes politicians bring up military matters ”only because they feel there's a public for it. In many countries, you see politicians getting votes using superficial, simplistic messages."
”It's always more about who I hate than who I love," he added.
You do realize only 2,386 US service members had been killed in Afghanistan as of 2016, right? I don't think you actually understand how large of a number 15,000 is in military logistics. "Downsizing" generally happens to soldiers who have failed to advance for disciplinary or other problems, in outmoded occupational specialties who have failed retraining, or who otherwise are accounted-for as minimal losses.
Most of the transgender soldiers I've known have served in highly-trained and desirable MOS fields like satellite communications, medicine, legal, and finance. You can't just shelve 15,000 of them and expect it to have the same impact as mustering out 10,000 marginal soldiers, many of whom were probably looking at voluntary or forced separation anyway. That's not a reasonable equivocation in terms of manpower and logistics.
Even taking a lowball estimate of $1,000,000 a head to replace them, that's $15,000,000,000 off the top to replace them for a savings of likely less than $10,000,000 in terms of avoiding medical transitioning costs in military coverage. Then you also have to deal with the fact you have cut out a percentage of qualified applicants to the MOS fields, which means now you most likely have to incur costs--increasing signing bonuses to make up recruiting shortfalls, increasing training facilities and staffing to push through more soldiers through faster, or just lowering your standards across the board and taking on all the risks that entails--and again, you get very little out of it.
You're also almost certainly looking at paying continuing benefits for these 15,000 soldiers regardless, because while I'm sure it's a Republican wet dream to boot them out on a dishonorable discharge, it's only going to take one highly-decorated transgender soldier being mustered out on a completely undeserved dishonorable discharge for this to turn into political suicide.