The backlash from Sony handing the IP to someone else would bring down the internet, unless it was Kojima and Guillermo Del Toro.
Wait, that sounds amazing.....
Falcom could do it, I believe in 'em more than almost any other studio. They know how to write story, how to handle lore, how to do amazing boss fights, they do awesome action gameplay, and know how to make interesting monster designs. Plus they have an incredible sound team.
I know it's an unpopular opinion among souls fans but I bet someone could do it and and do it so much better than fromsoft.
Deck13's efforts are a far cry in combat mechanics, lore and level design, .
Only Naughty Dog
Based on the fact other devs keep failing at making a better Dark Souls game?I know it's an unpopular opinion among souls fans but I bet someone could do it and and do it so much better than fromsoft.
I don't think Bloodborne needs a sequel.
Except Retro is a fully owned Nintendo subsidiary.Maybe Retro Studios? I mean outside the fact that Bloodborne is a Sony IP. But quality wise, Retro could probably equal it if they were put to the task in theory. Their level design prowess is astoundingly vast.
Did the op ask a question then say 'no-one'? That's a strange way to start a thread.
For an answer...Eh CDPR? I'm certain they could do the atmosphere and storytelling right, combat would be iffy, but with proper direction, they'd probably pull something off. The real answer of course is 'no-one' as mentioned in the...op.
I don't get what's..."strange" about it?
I asked a question to see what other people think even though i personally was against the idea.I was just curious to see what other people think about it.
It's just odd. I'd expect you to come up with a decently thought out example instead of 'no-one unless supervision'. It's alien to me to think up hypothetical questions to something you don't really want. Not a slight against you of course, I was just taken aback a little.
Personaly i think that if it isn't made by From Software then no one else should do it.Not only because it's a very complex game that relied a lot to one man's vision (and his team) but also because i fear that even if the game ends up being good a lot of people will look down upon it just because it's not made by From Software and Miyazaki.
I know it's an unpopular opinion among souls fans but I bet someone could do it and and do it so much better than fromsoft.
Give it to Obsidian, so a Soulsborne game can finally have a well made narrative for once
You mean overwritten.
One that doesn't require the player to fill in huge blanks with whatever rubbish they think up themselves would be a good start. Self Interpretation in plot is fine and all but not when you have to it for 60% of the whole game.
Give it to Obsidian, so a Soulsborne game can finally have a well made narrative for once
Obsidian's narrative is trash compare to Soulsborne.
Give it to Obsidian, so a Soulsborne game can finally have a well made narrative for once
A Bloodborne without Miyazaki and From is not a game I want.
Barf. Might as well give it to Ninja Theory.Give it to Obsidian, so a Soulsborne game can finally have a well made narrative for once