lucius said:
Their reviews are all over the place a lot of times, more than most game mags and other top video game sites. Even though I have some problems with IGN and Game Informer they have more consistent reviews. Gametrailers is good for overall reviews also.
I think Gamepro is one of the worst for reviews and so are these guys.
Also forgot to add they seem to throw in some scores just to get a "reaction effect" instead of fairly reviewing a game, I have no doubt.
Mass Effect - 7/10 - Agree!
Jade Empire - 7/10 - Agree!
KotOR - 9/10 - Agree!
Baldur's Gate 2 - 8/10 - NP
The Witcher - 5/10 - Disagree! I'd have given it a 7 but then again, they probably reviewed the original version with a lot more bugs in it.
Morrowind - 6/10 - I'm in the minority, but I agree...I can't get into it.
Oblivion - 8/10 - Agree! But close to a 9 for me.
Fallout 3 - 7/10 - Agree!
Diablo - 7/10 - NP
Diablo II - 6/10 - NP
Dragon age: Origins - 5/10 - AGREE!!!! It was a total chore to finish.
Mass Effect 2 - 10/10 - Too high...I'd have given it a 9...still worthy of its score, though.
Honestly I don't see the controversy in those reviews...Edge reviews often get a raised eyebrow but those eyebrows usually come down as time passes and objectivity is easier to come by...which leads me to my other point: I know this sounds condescending of me but I can't help but think that age has a bit to do with it. At 41 years old, and after the thousands of hours of gaming I've played, I find that my tastes have changed and like anyone who has acquired a taste for something, my gaming "palette" (I believe) is more refined. Perhaps this is why I generally agree with them?
Naturally there are exceptions...but honestly they are rare and for the few disagreements I've had with them, I simply accept it as a difference of opinion (as opposed to the bizarre conspiracy theories that get bandied about here).