Even that is a bit much.DCharlie said:Dehyped : Next Xbox and PS4 to be able to render Epic's latest engine at a steady frame rate at 1080p in 3D
Even that is a bit much.DCharlie said:Dehyped : Next Xbox and PS4 to be able to render Epic's latest engine at a steady frame rate at 1080p in 3D
MrBig said:The uninformed posts in this thread are terrifying. It's like half the people here were asleep during each new console release.
Dynamic foliage has been in this gen of consoles for years.
Parallax algorithms and tessellation are starting to come into wide use and make reliance on normals for major things obsolete.
AI is limited by the either the CPU or GPU, and by how far the developer wants to devote to it, but that really has nothing to do with hardware beyond that.
Even that is a bit much.
BurntPork said:Even that is a bit much.
If you take out the 3D part, sure.Meisadragon said:It is perfectly reasonable to expect that.
They don't do a single thing to harm their credibility because only two types of people care about these things. People who can't effect any change like us and the people who want to cash in on the next big thing. It doesn't matter if it's bullshit and lies. Hell, if you spend any time looking at how the corporate world works it is all one big farce that drives the system.Monocle said:Why do companies assassinate their credibility with dumb hyperbolic statements like this? Lying too big undermines the point of lying in the first place: to deceive people.
I'd be thrilled if AMD weren't exaggerating, obviously, but what are the chances? There's only so many times you can slap my ass and say I'm in a horse race before I'll tell you to bugger off.
Perhaps, but what we really hope to see with a proper framerate is the UE4 which has yet to be shown to a public..DCharlie said:Dehyped : Next Xbox and PS4 to be able to render Epic's latest engine at a steady frame rate at 1080p in 3D
mckmas8808 said:And Epic (the company that made that) stated that it can run on 1 GTX 580, so what's the problem?
StevieP said:Yes, they can get that scripted cutscene to run on 1 300w graphics card if they downgrade the resolution, texture quality, lighting quality, polygon counts, and a variety of other things. But a 300w graphics card still isn't going into a console unless you guys like $600 consoles that look like PC towers. And it's still a scripted cutscene in the end.
You guys ARE bananas.
gundamkyoukai said:Next gen we will be lucky if games are 1080p , we might something like 1280x1080 or something else .
Still i can also see devs just staying at 720p .
Even some launch 360 games weren't 720p.dragonelite said:Just hope microsoft enforces 1080p for 2 years or so like they did 720p till halo3 hit.
szaromir said:Even some launch 360 games weren't 720p.
dragonelite said:I could have sworn they enforced third party devs 720p with 2xMsaa because of the Edram.
Maybe somebody fucked with and told bullshit to me. Wasn't that big of a gamer or into game development.
szaromir said:Even some launch 360 games weren't 720p.
This was true.They tried to include it in the trc, but got so much backlash that they removed the requirement.dragonelite said:I could have sworn they enforced third party devs 720p with 2xMsaa because of the Edram.
Maybe somebody fucked with and told bullshit to me. Wasn't that big of a gamer or into game development.
jim-jam bongs said:That Uncharted pic is causing Chrome to throw up a malware warning. Clever browser.
StevieP said:
2014? Ok. However, "very powerful" is a subjective term. If they have the equivalent of a 580, it won't be considered "very powerful" in 2014 by many.mckmas8808 said:Dude I think you will be very surprised come 2014 when the PS4 and Xbox 3 show itself to be very powerful.
And I don't care that it was a scripted cutscene. All games that I play have an in-engine cutscene. It sells and explains to me the story. So you aren't saying anything new or making the Samaritan video look worse by explaining that it's a scripted video.
herzogzwei1989 said:I'm still expecting a 2013 release for Xbox and for it to be able to handle PS2-quality CG in real-time, not Avatar.
StevieP said:There is no such thing.
ScionOfTheRisingSun said:I cant wait when all of the endless graphic whoring leads to the bottom falling out of the home console segment and we are all stuck with iPad graphics.
It will be incredibly heart wrenching but also incredibly well deserved by creators and consumers alike.
ScionOfTheRisingSun said:I cant wait when all of the endless graphic whoring leads to the bottom falling out of the home console segment and we are all stuck with iPad graphics.
It will be incredibly heart wrenching but also incredibly well deserved by creators and consumers alike.
ScionOfTheRisingSun said:I cant wait when all of the endless graphic whoring leads to the bottom falling out of the home console segment and we are all stuck with iPad graphics.
It will be incredibly heart wrenching but also incredibly well deserved by creators and consumers alike.
I completely agree.StevieP said:The wheels are already in motion.
herzogzwei1989 said:We still have along way to go in the field of real-time rendering. I think some of you are going to be amazed, once again, at what next-gen consoles will be capable of.
I cannot wait to see the look on some of your faces ^__^
herzogzwei1989 said:We still have along way to go in the field of real-time rendering. I think some of you are going to be amazed, once again, at what next-gen consoles will be capable of.
I cannot wait to see the look on some of your faces ^__^
Infamous Chris said:I didn't know you can see our faces through your monitor.
herzogzwei1989 said:Oh but I can ^__^
Infamous Chris said:
herzogzwei1989 said:We still have along way to go in the field of real-time rendering. I think some of you are going to be amazed, once again, at what next-gen consoles will be capable of.
I cannot wait to see the look on some of your faces ^__^
herzogzwei1989 said:We still have along way to go in the field of real-time rendering. I think some of you are going to be amazed, once again, at what next-gen consoles will be capable of.
I cannot wait to see the look on some of your faces ^__^
McHuj said:Graphic whoring will move to the iPad then if it hasn't already. When ipad2 was launched, Apple pointed out the 2x CPU and 9X graphics improvements over the previous version. When the next Ipad comes out, they'll tout their improvements again.
You can keep waiting. Pc gaming guarantees that will never happen.ScionOfTheRisingSun said:I cant wait when all of the endless graphic whoring leads to the bottom falling out of the home console segment and we are all stuck with iPad graphics.
It will be incredibly heart wrenching but also incredibly well deserved by creators and consumers alike.
Marco1 said:Would anyone like something similar to a Nvidea control panel were you could assign profiles to games with forced graphical improvements ?
For example, say the game could be 1920x1080 with 60fps stock but you could sacrifice resolution and framerate for extra AA and AF and post processing effects.
jim-jam bongs said:We have gone as far as we can go in the field of real-time rendering. I think some of you are going to be disappointed, once again, at what next-gen consoles will be capable of.
I cannot wait to see the look on some of your faces ^__^
FoxSpirit said:The only way to be disappointed by this gen is by taking a high-end PC as measure. Not if you compare PS2 levels to now.
Hot damn, we have seriously come a long way in that regard.
gatti-man said:You can keep waiting. Pc gaming guarantees that will never happen.
FoxSpirit said:The only way to be disappointed by this gen is by taking a high-end PC as measure. Not if you compare PS2 levels to now.
Hot damn, we have seriously come a long way in that regard.
herzogzwei1989 said:This current gen has not been disappointing really, it's just that now, after 5/6 years of advancement, silicon has moved on (on the PC side).
Yes we have come a long way, but that could be done all over again soon when next-gen consoles arrive.