Voost Kain
Banned
I would take a look to the Publisher/Producer credits if I were you, it's not that simple...
And I thought that "they" you were referring to was "Activision" in response to me... My bad I guess.
And I don't know where I'm failing in presenting arguments when you are ignoring or making up things...
Says I'm ignoring or making things up, has no proof, apologizes to for misreading and assuming things in this very post.
What?
I think its nice having a opposing view-point sometimes honestly; you being realistic is good for tempering my expectations this E3. Even though I'm still expecting Crash, will not be disappointing if he does not show.
People really want the game to happen and I feel there is too much smoke proving that something is happening with the IP. Its fine if you don't see that or don't believe that, but others do.
Either way, its making for productive discussion and I appreciate the comments you have been making thus far.
Smoke can work the other way around as well however.
I like Crash, I like Spyro, both are games people want back though people aren't as hyped for a Spyro because they kind of gave up on him a little after Skylanders.
But let's be honest here there's no real EVIDENCE that there is a new Crash we have played this same game for 3 years now. It doesn't make sense financially for Activision to sell the IP to SOny what benefit does that give Activision? This is likely the main issue people are ignoring when they say Crash is coming home.
As for a deal, while that is more likely, it still would not make much sense financially because why would they not release it multiplatform?
People here talk about Activision but when it comes to Crash all of a sudden Activision is saint nick?