When they actually get to those prices I would buy one.Facts are facts:
1070's below $450:
- $399 Gigabyte Windforce
- $409 MSI Aero
- $419 EVGA ACX 3.0
- $429 EVGA SC
- $429 Gigabyte G1
- $429 MSI Armor
- $439 MSI Gaming
When they actually get to those prices I would buy one.Facts are facts:
1070's below $450:
- $399 Gigabyte Windforce
- $409 MSI Aero
- $419 EVGA ACX 3.0
- $429 EVGA SC
- $429 Gigabyte G1
- $429 MSI Armor
- $439 MSI Gaming
LOL. Im sorry man.... I cant, i just cant.
Back with another newbie question here:
The specs for this card say "Boost Clock 1.7GHz".
What is this stat and how does it work? If my i7 processor (with no graphics card other than the onboard chip) clocks in at 3.6GHz do I then add the 1.7GHz from this card to say my PC runs at 5.3GHz? Is that how that works?
Hey dude, I dont know. I'm a console gamer who upgrades his PC once every 5-7 years. Seriously. I don't follow this shit. I just bought a new PC yesterday and am looking at getting a graphics card that is cheap and will get me by for another 5 years.
Hey dude, I dont know. I'm a console gamer who upgrades his PC once every 5-7 years. Seriously. I don't follow this shit. I just bought a new PC yesterday and am looking at getting a graphics card that is cheap and will get me by for another 5 years.
LOL. Yep, that's exactly how it works. Nice 5.3GHz computer. /s
No they are different parts that have their own clock speeds. 1.7Ghz boost clock means the GPU boosts to 1.7Ghz under load/while gaming.
So yeah the GTX 1060 or the AMD RX 480 are a good choice if you are looking for something cheap. I would honestly go with the RX 480 for future proofing because is has 2gb of extra vram, and I would expect it to surpass the 1060 in performance with driver updates over time. Wait for an aftermarket RX 480 though, which should be available around the same time as the 1060 (by the end of the month is when the aftermarket RX 480s will supposedly be out). My guess is they will also cost somewhere between $250 and $300.
Back with another newbie question here:
The specs for this card say "Boost Clock 1.7GHz".
What is this stat and how does it work? If my i7 processor (with no graphics card other than the onboard chip) clocks in at 3.6GHz do I then add the 1.7GHz from this card to say my PC runs at 5.3GHz? Is that how that works?
You have to add each physical core speed, then half of every logic cpu from your core i7. Then divide between the numbers of HHDs on your system and add 1 if you have a blu ray drive.
Back with another newbie question here:
The specs for this card say "Boost Clock 1.7GHz".
What is this stat and how does it work? If my i7 processor (with no graphics card other than the onboard chip) clocks in at 3.6GHz do I then add the 1.7GHz from this card to say my PC runs at 5.3GHz? Is that how that works?
You forgot the divide by zero if you have a GSync monitor.You have to add each physical core speed, then half of every logic cpu from your core i7. Then divide between the numbers of HHDs on your system and add 1 if you have a blu ray drive.
You have to add each physical core speed, then half of every logic cpu from your core i7. Then divide between the numbers of HHDs on your system and add 1 if you have a blu ray drive.
No it's more like your i7 saying it is 3.6 GHZ and clocks up to 4 GHZ in certain situations. The 1.7 GHZ is the equivalent of the 4 GHZ.
Interesting. I wasn't expecting Nvidia to have a good answer to the RX 480, let alone so quickly. However, even if it does end up offering relatively less value for money compared to the GTX 1060, I'm probably still getting an AIB partner RX 480. Monopolies bad, competition good.
Interesting. I wasn't expecting Nvidia to have a good answer to the RX 480, let alone so quickly. However, even if it does end up offering relatively less value for money compared to the GTX 1060, I'm probably still getting an AIB partner RX 480. Monopolies bad, competition good.
Yeah. QB One high-five. Very underrated case for HTPCs. Especiallly if you want a capable gaming HTPC with a tower cooler and long GPU. I was thinking about making a big thread on comfy couch PC gaming with my setup to show how you can have all the comfort+performance and freedom today to end all these stupid "but console is comfy and easy to use..." comments. But I have a bad feeling that the thread will not end well
I want to see the heatsink of that dual fan cooler.
I can't imagine why you would possibly need a 3 fan cooler for a 120watt gpu
My 2 fan 970 strix's fans are bored no matter how hard I overclock it.
Interesting. I wasn't expecting Nvidia to have a good answer to the RX 480, let alone so quickly. However, even if it does end up offering relatively less value for money compared to the GTX 1060, I'm probably still getting an AIB partner RX 480. Monopolies bad, competition good.
hope you know that AMD is selling way more graphics chips for games than nvidia.
If you're counting consoles, they barely count.
Interesting. I wasn't expecting Nvidia to have a good answer to the RX 480, let alone so quickly. However, even if it does end up offering relatively less value for money compared to the GTX 1060, I'm probably still getting an AIB partner RX 480. Monopolies bad, competition good.
Yeah. Also the ability to use normal PSU is heaven sent because sfx and sfx-l are either rare or super expensive in my country.
hopefully there are smaller versions indeed of this card because my video card is getting in the way of the usb things.
how many games do you own that are also available on consoles and therefore optimized for AMD
...kicking the wasps nest
hope you know that AMD is selling way more graphics chips for games than nvidia.
Hey dude, I dont know. I'm a console gamer who upgrades his PC once every 5-7 years. Seriously. I don't follow this shit. I just bought a new PC yesterday and am looking at getting a graphics card that is cheap and will get me by for another 5 years.
how many games do you own that are also available on consoles and therefore optimized for AMD
...kicking the wasps nest
Im gonna say none of them?
Ooh no.. Why would they make this, 3gb is not enough
I want to see the heatsink of that dual fan cooler.
I can't imagine why you would possibly need a 3 fan cooler for a 120watt gpu
My 2 fan 970 strix's fans are bored no matter how hard I overclock it.
LOL, what?It's Mini-ITX, no-one who's running a Mini-ITX rig is that concerned with performance & 3GB is fine for lower-specced 1080p play.
I'll admit that I'm not up to speed on actual numbers from these companies. Sales, margins, profits, all that. But am I wrong in thinking AMD is on the ropes while Nvidia is not?
It's Mini-ITX, no-one who's running a Mini-ITX rig is that concerned with performance & 3GB is fine for lower-specced 1080p play.
LOL, what?
Why would ITX = not concerned about performance?
Because you can't SLI?
3GB model, why? The mini ITX offerings look cool though
Hey dude, I dont know. I'm a console gamer who upgrades his PC once every 5-7 years. Seriously. I don't follow this shit. I just bought a new PC yesterday and am looking at getting a graphics card that is cheap and will get me by for another 5 years.
Mini-ITX form-factor allows for significantly less cooling performance over a standard ATX format, both for CPU cooling and case-flow.
You're not looking at top drawer performance when you build a Mini-ITX PC, most are looking for a HTPC with some gaming performance over using the iGPU..
Well... a had a reference 290x and 4770k on a itx bitfenix case. There are no worst case scenario than this. This rig still lives on a friends house.
Hey dude, I dont know. I'm a console gamer who upgrades his PC once every 5-7 years. Seriously. I don't follow this shit. I just bought a new PC yesterday and am looking at getting a graphics card that is cheap and will get me by for another 5 years.
Would the GTX 1060 be too much of a card to use with an FX6300?
Would the GTX 1060 be too much of a card to use with an FX6300?
Anybody knows the answer to this?
Would the GTX 1060 be too much of a card to use with an FX6300?