More_Badass
Member
Paying respects to the returning kingHere's to a Frontier old and new
Paying respects to the returning kingHere's to a Frontier old and new
Rockstar wouldn't use Bluepoint, they're against using high profile porting studios using their tech. IF they have decided to outsource a Redemption Remaster, it would most likely be farmed off to the lowest bidder, as was done for the "Remasters" of the GTA titles on Mobile and PS3/Xbox 360 last gen. But that's only when they're pushed to do so, they'd prefer to do things in-house BUT also prefer to focus on new projects and just leave their old work behind.Bluepoint has been silent for a while
Redemption was set at the end of the classic western era, the new one could be set at its start.
I'm no history buff, so when would that put it year wise? Could it crossover with civil war stuff?
YOU EAT BABIES
It's tough to identify when the American West really started as a concept, but you'd have to probably go to the 1830s or so when westward expansion really took hold. The Gold Rush wasn't until 1849, and the American civil war wouldn't begin in earnest for more than a decade after that.
The period we really think of the wild west is typically after the American Civil War, as many pardoned Confederate Soldiers were shipped out West after the war as difficult tours of duty in the Army.
Paying respects to the returning king
Just what John Marston says toSay what?
Certainly could. I mean The Good, The Bad and The Ugly is set during the Civil War. That's as classic a western as there is.Redemption was set at the end of the classic western era, the new one could be set at its start.
I'm no history buff, so when would that put it year wise? Could it crossover with civil war stuff?
Dream scenario would be a Remaster release this holiday with the next Red Dead coming spring 2017.
I expect a soundtrack as awesome as the first one.
I expect a soundtrack as awesome as the first one.
YOU EAT BABIES
I expect a soundtrack as awesome as the first one.
I hate people who say this. Stop being a smartass. It was the first Red Dead game that actually mattered. Nobody cares about Revolver. Nobody remembers Revolver. Let people call Redemption the first Red Dead.You mean second.
I hate people who say this. Stop being a smartass. It was the first Red Dead game that actually mattered. Nobody cares about Revolver. Nobody remembers Revolver. Let people call Redemption the first Red Dead.
I need to calm down.
You mean second.
I'm glad we cleared this up. Good day, sir.
No, I don't. Revolver has nothing to do with Redemption and with this new game, stop acting like it is the same thing just because it has "Red Dead" on the title.
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs
- Better stealth. Another half-baked mechanic in RDR. Give me bows, distractions, easy-to-perform takedowns, etc.
- More involved robbery/outlaw activities. Hold-ups and the bandanna were a good start, but I hope it's expanded here
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks
- Ricocheting shots, because why not
- Swimming and boats
No, I don't. Revolver has nothing to do with Redemption and with this new game, stop acting like it is the same thing just because it has "Red Dead" on the title.
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs
Red Dead Revolver was a fantastic game that many of us enjoyed quite a bit more than Redemption. It also had multiple and very different playable characters like this one seems will have too.I hate people who say this. Stop being a smartass. It was the first Red Dead game that actually mattered. Nobody cares about Revolver. Nobody remembers Revolver. Let people call Redemption the first Red Dead.
I need to calm down.
Nothing more thrilling than the pulse-raising collectathons and broken economy of AssCreed 2The universal praise the game gets is insane to me when it came out after Assassins Creed 2 which has TONS more content/things to do for an open world game.
Rockstar Games themselves consider it the "Red Dead" series, with Revolver being the first game, after Redemption got huge they even updated the old Revolver websites with the branding and Red Dead banner. Internally file wise for Redemption the game is noted as rdr2.I hate people who say this. Stop being a smartass. It was the first Red Dead game that actually mattered. Nobody cares about Revolver. Nobody remembers Revolver. Let people call Redemption the first Red Dead.
I need to calm down.
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks
My hype level is out of control, imagine how good this game is going to look, how great it will feel in the wide open west with those next gen graphics, those sunsets, those weather systems, oh man I can just feel the atmosphere now.
Please Rockstar, I beg you, do not make multiplayer the focus, do not.
All of the reasons people say they hated GTA4 and wanted to improve to GTA5 applies to RDR. RDR was all boring shooting galleries with uninteresting characters and tortuous chore missions like rounding up sheep. Every opportunity for fun (like the car or glider thing) was unavailable to the player, and all side games were shit like horseshoe's and card betting.
At least GTA4 you could drive around and see the pretty buildings. RDR was an empty desert with like 8 towns that were built like a hollywood set, 1-2 blocks long with a saloon and some houses. The universal praise the game gets is insane to me when it came out after Assassins Creed 2 which has TONS more content/things to do for an open world game.
Tonally RDR was perfect though it just wasn't fun at all and the chore missions to get you to care about your family were the worst thing I've ever played in any game. And the PS3 version was blurry as shit compared to 360.
So you can't call it GTAV because the previous games are different?
Red Dead Redemption is the second one whether you like it or not.
I hope that this release goes straight to PC instead of god knows how much later.
Sure, a year later, it will come to PC xDI hope that this release goes straight to PC instead of god knows how much later.
GTA V had a huge focus on the online mode and 0 single player DLC and I spend more than 150 hours at the offline mode and it's my favorite game from the last gen
So if they do the same with the next RDR, fine by me
Oh sorry, I didn't know that earlier GTA games were developed by Capcom with a complete different approach to gameplay and the criminal life theme.
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs
- Better stealth. Another half-baked mechanic in RDR. Give me bows, distractions, easy-to-perform takedowns, etc.
- More involved robbery/outlaw activities. Hold-ups and the bandanna were a good start, but I hope it's expanded here
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks
- Ricocheting shots, because why not
- Swimming and boats
You (and other people) need a damn history lesson.Oh sorry, I didn't know that earlier GTA games were developed by Capcom with a complete different approach to gameplay and the criminal life theme.