• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rockstar Games potentially hints at Red Dead sequel on Twitter [Up: New Image]

Status
Not open for further replies.
5xkt1to352sx.png


https://twitter.com/Titanfallgame/status/788138833451814913
Here's to a Frontier old and new
Paying respects to the returning king :p
 

Ash735

Member
Bluepoint has been silent for a while
Rockstar wouldn't use Bluepoint, they're against using high profile porting studios using their tech. IF they have decided to outsource a Redemption Remaster, it would most likely be farmed off to the lowest bidder, as was done for the "Remasters" of the GTA titles on Mobile and PS3/Xbox 360 last gen. But that's only when they're pushed to do so, they'd prefer to do things in-house BUT also prefer to focus on new projects and just leave their old work behind.

There's a reason they turned down fixing GTA IV on PC, moving it to Steamworks, etc, when Take2 questioned the status a few years back.
 
Redemption was set at the end of the classic western era, the new one could be set at its start.

I'm no history buff, so when would that put it year wise? Could it crossover with civil war stuff?

It's tough to identify when the American West really started as a concept, but you'd have to probably go to the 1830s or so when westward expansion really took hold. The Gold Rush wasn't until 1849, and the American civil war wouldn't begin in earnest for more than a decade after that.

The period we really think of the wild west is typically after the American Civil War, as many pardoned Confederate Soldiers were shipped out West after the war as difficult tours of duty in the Army. There's no reason if this were a prequel it couldn't still be set in the late 1800s. The death of the West, though, is just such a great backdrop for a videogame.
 

Maxey

Member
It's tough to identify when the American West really started as a concept, but you'd have to probably go to the 1830s or so when westward expansion really took hold. The Gold Rush wasn't until 1849, and the American civil war wouldn't begin in earnest for more than a decade after that.

The period we really think of the wild west is typically after the American Civil War, as many pardoned Confederate Soldiers were shipped out West after the war as difficult tours of duty in the Army.

Alright, so maybe just set it during and after the Civil War. Have the prologue be you fighting in the war and then becoming a gun for hire in the west after the war is over.
 

Fjordson

Member
Redemption was set at the end of the classic western era, the new one could be set at its start.

I'm no history buff, so when would that put it year wise? Could it crossover with civil war stuff?
Certainly could. I mean The Good, The Bad and The Ugly is set during the Civil War. That's as classic a western as there is.

Redemption ended in 1914, so I think it's a given that whatever this is will be set earlier.
 
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs
- Better stealth. Another half-baked mechanic in RDR. Give me bows, distractions, easy-to-perform takedowns, etc.
- More involved robbery/outlaw activities. Hold-ups and the bandanna were a good start, but I hope it's expanded here
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks
- Ricocheting shots, because why not
- Swimming and boats
 

Chris1

Member
No, I don't. Revolver has nothing to do with Redemption and with this new game, stop acting like it is the same thing just because it has "Red Dead" on the title.

Well, Red Dead is the franchise and even Take Two acknowledges that, it's not Red Dead Redemption.

But I do think it'll be called Red Dead Redemption 2 too.
 
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs
- Better stealth. Another half-baked mechanic in RDR. Give me bows, distractions, easy-to-perform takedowns, etc.
- More involved robbery/outlaw activities. Hold-ups and the bandanna were a good start, but I hope it's expanded here
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks
- Ricocheting shots, because why not
- Swimming and boats

Other than stealth you just nailed my wishlist. Though honestly with those other systems mentioned being more involved I'd imagine a well fleshed out stealth mechanic would probably feel more necessary. Damn fine list. I'd play the crap out of that for months. Only other thing I'd add would be expanded AI behaviors and gang members available to be brought along in the open world when you want.
 
No, I don't. Revolver has nothing to do with Redemption and with this new game, stop acting like it is the same thing just because it has "Red Dead" on the title.

So you can't call it GTAV because the previous games are different?

Red Dead Redemption is the second one whether you like it or not.
 

Badgerst3

Member
Alternating between outlaws and lawmen character arcs could be cool.

Prequel with a Marston posse and a Marshal posse building up to a showdown?

All in either way. Unless it's online only.
 

Maxey

Member
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs

Just steal Naughty Dog's melee system. Punch lasers in the old west!
 
It'll be called Red Dead Reparations starring a black guy and a native dude as an odd couple pairing like Lethal Weapon or Rush Hour, navigating the white man's world in the midst of the lawless era of The West.
 

Javier23

Banned
I hate people who say this. Stop being a smartass. It was the first Red Dead game that actually mattered. Nobody cares about Revolver. Nobody remembers Revolver. Let people call Redemption the first Red Dead.

I need to calm down.
Red Dead Revolver was a fantastic game that many of us enjoyed quite a bit more than Redemption. It also had multiple and very different playable characters like this one seems will have too.
 

Ash735

Member
I hate people who say this. Stop being a smartass. It was the first Red Dead game that actually mattered. Nobody cares about Revolver. Nobody remembers Revolver. Let people call Redemption the first Red Dead.

I need to calm down.
Rockstar Games themselves consider it the "Red Dead" series, with Revolver being the first game, after Redemption got huge they even updated the old Revolver websites with the branding and Red Dead banner. Internally file wise for Redemption the game is noted as rdr2.

Rockstar consider Redemption the second game. Take2 consider Redemption the second game. Stubborn people who refuses to acknowledge an entire game exists and think they know better than the creators just because the second one was more popular and clickbaiting articles on websites are the ones who are still clinging onto Red Dead Redemption 2.
 

daftstar

Member
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks

This is the highlight for me. The fact that it's Rockstar's first current gen game I'm most excited by what they can do with the game world itself.
 
My hype level is out of control, imagine how good this game is going to look, how great it will feel in the wide open west with those next gen graphics, those sunsets, those weather systems, oh man I can just feel the atmosphere now.

Please Rockstar, I beg you, do not make multiplayer the focus, do not.

The new splash image doesn't give me hope :/

Then again I don't see R* going full multiplayer. That would be a sad day indeed.
 

Gorillaz

Member
Yea dudes trying to erase Revolver despite it not being popular are corny. Houser brothers still proudly takes the L that the game was from a commercial standpoint (at least not at the level of gta bully etc) and considers it the first in the series. They even put it out again on psn.


It's not going to be called Redemption 2 and Redemption suddenly didn't just become the only game in the series.
 
All of the reasons people say they hated GTA4 and wanted to improve to GTA5 applies to RDR. RDR was all boring shooting galleries with uninteresting characters and tortuous chore missions like rounding up sheep. Every opportunity for fun (like the car or glider thing) was unavailable to the player, and all side games were shit like horseshoe's and card betting.

At least GTA4 you could drive around and see the pretty buildings. RDR was an empty desert with like 8 towns that were built like a hollywood set, 1-2 blocks long with a saloon and some houses. The universal praise the game gets is insane to me when it came out after Assassins Creed 2 which has TONS more content/things to do for an open world game.

Tonally RDR was perfect though it just wasn't fun at all and the chore missions to get you to care about your family were the worst thing I've ever played in any game. And the PS3 version was blurry as shit compared to 360.


Lol. Drive a car and glide as a cowboy? No thanks. I've got a horse!! it's the wild west! The desert's emptiness is what makes this game so good! The atmosphere in RDR is beyond everything else!

AC2 is full of collectibles. No thanks. I don't want that in a Red Dead game.
 
GTA V had a huge focus on the online mode and 0 single player DLC and I spend more than 150 hours at the offline mode and it's my favorite game from the last gen

So if they do the same with the next RDR, fine by me

GTA V was going to have SP DLC but at some point they cancelled it after GTAO turned out to be ludicrously profitable. It probably didn't help that so many people likely didn't bother playing through the story after online came out.
 
RDR did so many things right. What I'd love to see in the sequel:
- Better melee. The hand-to-hand in RDR was weak. It's the west, bar brawls are a cliche. I'd love to see some dynamic system where you can smash bottles over heads and pick up chairs
- Better stealth. Another half-baked mechanic in RDR. Give me bows, distractions, easy-to-perform takedowns, etc.
- More involved robbery/outlaw activities. Hold-ups and the bandanna were a good start, but I hope it's expanded here
- More dynamic weather and ecosystem. Floods from rainstorms, dust storms, tornadoes, huge herds of buffalo, even more terrifying Revenant bear attacks
- Ricocheting shots, because why not
- Swimming and boats

- More cohesive/better integrated story, is the main reason why is the only Rockstar game I've ever finished.
 

Dabanton

Member
If there is one thing I hope they nail is to have LESS animals.

As I rode through certain places I felt like Dr Doolittle as there would be animals everywhere making noises even next too busy trail roads, it sort of break immersion.

I think the way they do it in GTAV out in the wilderness is better. Less animals but when one does appear it's special.
 

Ash735

Member
Oh sorry, I didn't know that earlier GTA games were developed by Capcom with a complete different approach to gameplay and the criminal life theme.
You (and other people) need a damn history lesson.

Red Dead Revolver was a concept game designed by Angel Studio Games in the early 2000's, it was eventually attached to Capcom as PUBLISHER. However Rockstar Games purchased Angel Studio in 2002 and purchased the rights for Revolver too from Capcom. Angel Studio was renamed Rockstar San Diego.

When Red Dead Revolver came out, it was a Rockstar title, mainly finished under Rockstar supervision, and the same staff worked on it from Concept to release including the transition of the studio from Angel Studio to Rockstar San Diego.

Capcom retained some publishing rights for the game in other countries however, similar to a deal they struck to publish the GTA games on PS2 in Japan, etc.

Oh yeah, and...
eQHr8c4.jpg
 

Maxey

Member
I hope the character animation is less heavy and clumsy this time. In Redemption it was too easy to get stuck trying to enter an open door.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom