• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kansas 04 special election results thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's more the DCCC that is involved. The DNC is more big picture in its involvement but it certainly sets the strategy for the 50 states. I hope Perez/Ellison see what happened in Kansas as inspiration- if the race in ruby red Kansas (which has idiotically elected Brownback several times) is competitive, that can only mean good things nationally when 2018 elections roll around. Build a good slate and Congress will suddenly become a lot tighter.
 

JohnsonUT

Member
Let's see how Georgia goes. If there is a trend, it should be a decently comfortable victory for the Ds. But, imagine everything right of that -20 swinging the Dems way...

enten-kansas4-1.png
 

Ac30

Member
Let's see how Georgia goes. If there is a trend, it should be a decently comfortable victory. But, imagine everything right of that -20 swinging the Dems way...

enten-kansas4-1.png

DCCC better start throwing money at Ossoff

Also I can't fucking math tonight, that's a 6% margin, nuts. With Trump, Pence and Cruz on the case, wow.
 

Chumly

Member
DCCC better start throwing money at Ossoff
Ossoff already has millions and millions. Honestly he doesn't need DNC money. It would be a waste. Montana would be a better strategy. Or even putting infrastructure in place for 2018
 

Amir0x

Banned
He won by 60%? Holy crap.

No, he didn't. He's using the percentage points the Republicans won by to say "R+30" (Trump +27%, Pompeo +30%), instead of the spread method (Dems have to gain +15% vote, and Repubs would have to lose 15%). R+15 is correct by the traditional political way of tabulating it.
 

Ac30

Member
Ossoff already has millions and millions. Honestly he doesn't need DNC money. It would be a waste. Montana would be a better strategy. Or even putting infrastructure in place for 2018

I've heard that the less the DCCC does for Quist the better.
 

Effect

Member
Or, national Democrats getting involved could have turned off Kansas voters who don't like the national Democratic Party.

That's the tricky part. There are many areas in country where outright helping is going to hurt some candidates. Sending them money and having a hands off approach is going to work best in these areas.
 
The problem for the GOP is that many gerrymandered districts are now just R+5 or so. They basically exchanged their margins for seats and it will bite them in the ass hardcore if we even only get a very mild uprising next year of D+5. If R+20 districts are in danger, that's a looooooooooot of seats.
 

UraMallas

Member
No, he didn't. He's using the percentage points the Republicans won by to say "R+30" (Trump +27%, Pompeo +30%), instead of the spread method (Dems have to gain +15% vote, and Repubs would have to lose 15%). R+15 is correct by the traditional political way of tabulating it.

Okay. I was gonna say...

Here are KS districts in 2016. With results like tonight, that's 2 out of 4 that could be Ds in 2018:

f19q4Gq.png
 
DCCC better start throwing money at Ossoff

Also I can't fucking math tonight, that's a 6% margin, nuts. With Trump, Pence and Cruz on the case, wow.

Ossoff has sucked up a lot of national money for his race. I'm local (not the district) and dude has prime TV, radio ads everywhere. Doing much better than the GOP in name recognition.
 

Allard

Member
Looks like all precincts except Sedgewick are in. Even if there is zero gain in the remaining votes the percentage should actually shrink unless Estes gains a bunch more votes proportionally in those final tallies. That means 5-6% win for Estes and that means a 25% swing since Pompeo and 20% swing from Trump. Despite not winning the actual seat, it is going scare the ever living shit out of a ton of house republicans.
 
Seriously peeps, this is on the DCCC.

This close and it could have swung with the right investment and infrastructure.

There are way more Republicans in this district than Dems. If the national Dems invested more in the race the GOP would have done the same. Some times 'infrastructure' isn't enough to overcome the voters.
 

Amir0x

Banned

These are just people like ErasureAcer who don't understand American politics, don't mind them. The same types people who think a socialist revolution is coming even though they have no idea how to strategically win elections or pass legislation and we just needed to focus on white working class voters and that racism is all about economics.
 
With a proper election cycle leading up to 2018, Democrats can make a lot of noise in midterms. These special elections are nice and all but are mainly bellweathers for next year.

I would encourage Thompson to run again against Estes. My feeling is that the GOP brand in Kansas is only going to be in worse shape. Estes has no charisma and is not an appealing candidate at all.
 
These are just people like ErasureAcer who don't understand American politics, don't mind them. The same types people who think a socialist revolution is coming even though they have no idea how to strategically win elections or pass legislation and we just needed to focus on white working class voters and that racism is all about economics.

Yup. I'm stupid. You're smart.
 
81,000 votes in 2016 for the Dem in KS04. Good effort but a lot sat on their ass and that's why the GOP will win again.

The Republicans have won that seat by an average of 30+ points since 2002. The fact that they came this close is remarkable in itself. Ossoff might be the happiest candidate in the country tonight.
 
Also, people are forgetting that Trump will be fucking up for one more year before mid-terms. Christ look what's happened in under 100 days.
 

Sean C

Member
If dems were to regain 100 seats on the house, would them obtain supermajority?
A supermajority is 290; if the Democrats gained 100 seats (which, to be clear, will not happen) they'd have 294.

81,000 votes in 2016 for the Dem in KS04. Good effort but a lot sat on their ass and that's why the GOP will win again.
Midterms and special elections always have depressed turnout relative to a presidential year. The Democratic base turned out much better than the GOP did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom