Sadly not so many with full editorWhat games did you think are good examples of having black hair options?
Every game with a character creator has trans options by default, because no one asked you whether or not they were trans.
It sounds to me almost like a 4chan troll to get devs to make 'trans character creation' possible having someone in a dress with a manly voice.
This will just rile the mob up even more
Will there be spells to make my penis or vag disappear?
I didn't know about Dark Souls!Sadly not so many with full editor
Nba games, something in sims 4, maybe dark souls games iirc
Fixed for you.Resetera is that way. >>>
The game is being worked on by the people who were offended by her. Do you really think there won't be pandering to them in it?There's a difference here. TLOU2 pandered to that audience so they on the whole defended it.
A Harry Potter game probably isn't pandering and fair game for the woke gaming press to not defend it.
I seriously don’t understand how he got a job at bloombergI wonder what Jason's feelings are like. Does he know he works for a billionaire racist? How does he reconcile his feelings of pointing out "injustice in video game characters" while making money for a billionaire racist?
Oh, I know the answer, he hypes up Gamergate and "gamer extremism" so he seems like a real hero by comparison.
well have a conversation with them and find something you have in common and move on because its the internet.Jesus Christ there's a lot of assholes on these forums.
You'd be surprised. While it's debatable whether SJWs really do consume Star Wars or Marvel media, I do think a lot of them are genuine Potterheads. That's why it's tearing their minds out that the creator of their favorite series is a TERF. Like I said, they want their Wizarding world but don't want to support it's 'problematic' creator. It's hilarious.i see now that the game is including transgender characters....but somehow it's not enough!! because JK Rowling will still profit!!
what you want to happen at this point really? she fucking created Harry Potter so yeah she's gonna make money from it. should we just cancel the game? scrap it? lol naaaaaah.
these people were never gonna buy the game so how bout they just STFU. they will piss and moan no matter what. there is no pleasing them.
AC certainly has awesome options, even more considering it has a chibi style, is pretty accurateI didn't know about Dark Souls!
Animal Crossing NH eventually released a free set of afro-textured hairstyles which I thought looked really good. Not sure if that counts because it wasn't there at launch, but considering the series' history it's good progress.
Rowling has courted controversy on Twitter in the past, but this month, she made her most inflammatory comments yet. On June 6, Rowling tweeted criticism of an article that used the phrase “people who menstruate” to differentiate between those who were born women and those who transitioned. Later, the author expanded on her thoughts in an essay on her website, writing that “the ‘inclusive’ language that calls female people ‘menstruators’ and ‘people with vulvas’ strikes many women as dehumanising and demeaning.”
So let's get this straight. JK Rowling is in trouble because she disagrees with people calling women "people who menstruate" or "people with vulvas". This is, according to Jason., "her most inflammatory comments yet". Her disagreeing with "people who menstruate".
THIS is why people have lost their shit for years? The fact that a woman does not agree with what a bunch of men in dresses want to call her? She was not happy with men calling women "people with vulvas" and that makes her a horrible person?
Effing unreal.
“Anti trans crusade”
Yep. She's anti their delusional agenda. Which most people grounded in reality are.The truth hurts those weirdos. She ain’t “anti trans”, they’re just tarded.
Yep. She's anti their delusional agenda. Which most people grounded in reality are.
To be fair though, she kinda had this coming to her because she entertained their delusional agenda. Remember when she revealed Dumbledore was gay all along and didn't mind a black actress playing Hermione in The Cursed Child?Yep. She's anti their delusional agenda. Which most people grounded in reality are.
Expellidickus!! Vaginium leviosa!!This will just rile the mob up even more
Will there be spells to make my penis or vag disappear?
The truth hurts those weirdos. She ain’t “anti trans”, they’re just tarded.
The people who get it worst are always the ones who were seen as being on their side or pandered to them.To be fair though, she kinda had this coming to her because she entertained their delusional agenda. Remember when she revealed Dumbledore was gay all along and didn't mind a black actress playing Hermione in The Cursed Child?
It's only her statements against transpeople that made her public enemy No 1 among the woke crowd.
I'm sorry to be insensitive but are people working in a videogame industry children unable to process emotions? TF it means when grown-ups are 'sad and frustrated' because of views of someone they never met and who has no oversight on their work? Children can be 'sad and frustrated', as an adult you are supposed to learn how to deal with this shit.The people leaking this news did it because development of the game started long before Rowling's anti-trans crusade, and because they're sad and frustrated
I for one will be furious if we don’t get wizxrd and wxtch.I'm sorry to be insensitive but are people working in a videogame industry children unable to process emotions? TF it means when grown-ups are 'sad and frustrated' because of views of someone they never met and who has no oversight on their work? Children can be 'sad and frustrated', as an adult you are supposed to learn how to deal with this shit.
Also - want to bet people will find offense with witch/wizard? Oh boy, I sure hope it will not be linked to boy / girl selection, otherwise you will get people up in arms over not being able to play 'male witches' and 'female wizards'.
Here, have a male witch(er):
This guy though:
You got it the other way around.So let's get this straight. JK Rowling is in trouble because she disagrees with people calling women "people who menstruate" or "people with vulvas". This is, according to Jason., "her most inflammatory comments yet". Her disagreeing with "people who menstruate".
THIS is why people have lost their shit for years? The fact that a woman does not agree with what a bunch of men in dresses want to call her? She was not happy with men calling women "people with vulvas" and that makes her a horrible person?
Effing unreal.
To be more precise - 'women' being used instead of 'people who menstruate' was considered inflammatory since trans men before transition (so in effect biological women) can menstruate as well.You got it the other way around.
"People who menstruate" was not used as a descriptor for women. The idea was that it's not just women who menstruate. As in, men menstruate, women can have penises, and men can give birth - that's what she disagreed with.
So it's much more absurd than how you understood it.
There are also women that are post menopause and have a hysterotomy and have other disease things that inhibit vaginal bleeding, so it's not suitable at all.You got it the other way around.
"People who menstruate" was not used as a descriptor for women. The idea was that it's not just women who menstruate. As in, men menstruate, women can have penises, and men can give birth - that's what she disagreed with.
So it's much more absurd than how you understood it.
'Trans rights' has become false flag, the term isn't used as someone who isn't part of the movement would understand it. It's not about rights, it's about mindset.To be more precise - 'women' being used instead of 'people who menstruate' was considered inflammatory since trans men before transition (so in effect biological women) can menstruate as well.
It is important to note (what everyone is forgetting, but hey - let's be outraged) that UK feminism is structured differently than the US one. JK Rowling sees trans women rights as taking the spotlight from the rights of biological women, especially given that as a biological woman your life experience is different than that of a trans woman e.g. you don't have society making you critical of your weight at the age of 5 if you are a trans woman, since you are a boy at that age.
So she is not opposed to trans rights, what she is opposed to is trans rights becoming a mainstream of feminism, effectively sidelining the conversation regarding the dangers and difficulties faced by girls and young women from an early age.
To add on to what I was saying earlier, the development team has already stated that she has little to no influence on the game so....you can very well imagine what that means.There's a difference here. TLOU2 pandered to that audience so they on the whole defended it.
A Harry Potter game probably isn't pandering and fair game for the woke gaming press to not defend it.
This is so fucking ignorant. Go elsewhere? If you have a good job you can't simply go get another one like you would choose a TV program to watch. Working on a project is not supporting an IP, that would be buying it. And this asinine comment was posted during peak unemployment last year and relates to an industry where studios close quarterly kicking many people to the curb. Yeah belittle the challenges the people who work in the field that brings you to a message board face.But they will profit from her Property at the same time?
If they are that hurt by her Opinion , go elsewhere and don't support HP then.
Can't have it both ways.
But she isn't the one creating the image problem. Unhinged people on the net are, and they are creating the image problem for themselves and the trans community.She shouldn't be doubling down when it was obvious that it was creating an image problem.
Why the fuck are we putting adult sex topics in a series for children? Goddamn it.
Her comments only decrease the value of the property if the publishers decide to act on the criticism.This is so fucking ignorant. Go elsewhere? If you have a good job you can't simply go get another one like you would choose a TV program to watch. Working on a project is not supporting an IP, that would be buying it. And this asinine comment was posted during peak unemployment last year and relates to an industry where studios close quarterly kicking many people to the curb. Yeah belittle the challenges the people who work in the field that brings you to a message board face.
Rowling created HP and has a contract with businesses using the property. Her comments decrease the value of the property and harm the original agreements. She shouldn't be doubling down when it was obvious that it was creating an image problem. I suspect that many contracts for licensing properties will have clauses that protect the licensee from stupid creators blabbing off online because of this.
Boycotting the property because Rowling gets a cut is also ignorant. Let's try to damage a bunch of people's careers and lives because they are working on a game based on a property from a creator that is a shit. So thoughtful and useful.
Its not going to amount to much, but sometimes a game's success is determined by meeting some sales goal. If enough people are pissed off who would have bought the game but now don't, it could lead to layoffs and that is shitty.
Reality is scary! Please daddy no moreAgain this thread is bumped to the front page.... again there are no updates on the game. Just more fucking drama from dipshits who need to simply grow the fuck up and join the rest of in this amazing place called "reality".
they would just slap big tidies on hermione and called it a dayWestern people are so damn sensitive these days.
If this was a japanese dev they would not give a fuck.